Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rob Mills" wrote in message
news:QGQRb.2735$EW.2331@okepread02... The other antenna requires alot more horizontal space, which can add to the wind load. The Scantenna will provide a safer, more-secure mount to a mast. Jeff pretty decent results on VHF and UHF. Doesn't seem to work that well on 800 mhz and above. Chris I am more interested in freq's below 800 as I get great reception on the local 800 system with just the on-board antenna. I am smack dab in the middle of tornado alley and have been thinking as Jeff mentioned the ground plane will be quite a target. I was considering selling one but am now thinking I'll put up the ground plane and keep the Scantenna as a spare as I don't have much invested in either. Is that 9913 a small diameter or large dia coax? Expensive? I'm needing to put up 2 sw antennas and 1 scanner ant so will need quite a bit. Was thinking I would use RG6. RM~ 9913 cable is a medium sized cable - approx 8mm in diameter, and is moderately expensive. It is cheap compared to the hardlines like LDK550 (and a damn sight smaller), but more expensive than RG213 or similar (about the same size though). Sorry I cannot help with the prices, but I am not in the states so am not aware of what your prices will be like (cheaper than here in Aust however). Matt |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Antenna Question | CB | |||
Antenna Safety Question | Antenna | |||
Outdoor Antenna and lack of intermod | Scanner | |||
FS: Kenwood TMV7-A and Compet GP-9 base antenna | Equipment |