Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My understanding from an aviation standpoint is that there really is no
problems with using these devices on or near aircraft. The problem lies in that some devices MAY cause interference MAYBE. It is easier to paint everything with the same brush and just say no than it is to say what is allowed or not. Then you get into fighting with every clown that wants to bring their device just because "someone else was doing it so why cant I" As for living next to the airport and using a scanner....scanners don't cause airplanes to crash....pilots cause airplanes to crash. Think about it. Airports use some heavy duty transmitters...RADAR, and VHF/ UHF and aircraft transmit all sorts of signals. Why hasn't one pilot on one airplane or an ATC transmission caused another aircraft to get lost/act funny/fall out of the sky? We are merely being protected from the few that would try to use this equipment with malicious intent. S "Mediaguy500" wrote in message ... Just imagine the scanner outputs a stray signal on the navagation receiver or it blocks a transmissoin from the tower at a critical point. I know some people who live right near airports. (almost right next to the airports). could them listening to scanners in their own homes interfere with the airports' and airplanes' navigation sysyems and cause the planes to crash? I hope not, but it sounds to me like they can from the information given in this newsgroup. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|