https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/cf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout =500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=732432&fcc_i d='ADV2000527'

I think they should get the Pro96 working right before they start a 97

Looks like an updated PRO-95.

Bill Crocker


"Ronny Julian" wrote in message
...
https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/cf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout =500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=732432&fcc_i d='ADV2000527'

What's not working right on the PRO-96? I picked one up last week, and it's
performing perfectly.

Bill Crocker


"JunkMan" wrote in message
...
I think they should get the Pro96 working right before they start a 97

In article ,
says...
What's not working right on the PRO-96? I picked one up last week, and it's
performing perfectly.

Bill Crocker


"JunkMan" wrote in message
...
I think they should get the Pro96 working right before they start a 97






I know a couple of people who have them, no complaints from anyone..

BDK

This is not a digital scanner. It has some features I wish they had
included in the PRO-96



"JunkMan" wrote in message
...
I think they should get the Pro96 working right before they start a 97

On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 11:59:21 -0400, "Ronny Julian"
said in rec.radio.scanner:

This is not a digital scanner. It has some features I wish they had
included in the PRO-96

So do I. LTR (not that I need LTR yet), A/D PL decode and signal
stalker (which would save me a lot of time now and then).

I wonder how much more it'll cost, though. If it comes out at $199
I'll kick myself for buying the 95 on sale.

The PRO-96 works perfectly
OH, I forgot, it doesn't like LA, right!
"JunkMan" wrote in message
...
I think they should get the Pro96 working right before they start a 97