Scott Peterson Guilty! Are we safe now?
 

Scott Peterson Guilty! Are we safe now?

ONLY IF YOU DONT MARRY HIM

Larry Edwards mentioned in passing :

Scott Peterson Guilty! Are we safe now?

I'm just glad that the major news networks gave us a detailed history of
the case now that it's over. The detailed coverage they've been running for
the last two years whenever there's a slow news day just didn't give me
quite enough insight into the case. I mean, I am still wondering why this
case is more important than the thousands of other murder cases in the US...
therefore I must not understand the case... I need a Scott Peterson Network
: All Scott Peterson all the time.

obl-FRS :My XAct radios worked very well at Disney last weekend. Everybody
else had "privacy codes" and I didn't, which means I got to hear them but
they couldn't hear me. Very interesting.

--
Sam-I-Am
I know you've come to kill me. Shoot, coward, you're only going to kill
a man. -Che Guevera (October 9, 1967, just before being murdered)


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.794 / Virus Database: 538 - Release Date: 11/10/04

Sadly, there are many other whackos out there just like him. Who needs
terrorists from abroad, we have our own! We may sleep, eat, or work with
them. They gain our trust. Then the kill. How many murders do NOT make
"national" news. No disrespect to the deceased - this case isn't much
different than many others. What ****es me off, is that many are going to
make money off the memories of Laci and Conner. Most likely, the prick
headed to prison will - as well! His memoirs. I wonder if he made any cash
off the movie of the case before it went to trial? That is just do
wrong.......

L.



"JER1538A" wrote in message
...
ONLY IF YOU DONT MARRY HIM

"Sam" wrote in message
...
Larry Edwards mentioned in passing :

Scott Peterson Guilty! Are we safe now?

snip

Soooo silly. Everybody but his wife always was.

No...O.J. is still on the loose!

Bill Crocker


"Larry Edwards" wrote in message
...
Scott Peterson Guilty! Are we safe now?

Larry Edwards wrote:

Scott Peterson Guilty! Are we safe now?

I think you are a confused troll with little understanding of the point
of the criminal justice system much less its execution, which is what
Scott Peterson should soon face.


--
So I was feeding the hummingbirds but not changing the feeder sugar
water quickly enough and it fermented into something like that stuff
that Hunter S Thompson was drinking in the Rum Diary, anyway, so I had
these drunk birds flying everywhere just like mosquitoes in Minnesota,
dashing up one side of me, darting down the other, crashing into the
windows, falling off their perches, didn't even know they perched,
flying backwards, flying backwards, it was like something out of the
Exorcist. After a while though, I got bored with it all. Next Summer I'm
going to Alaska to feed french bread soaked in Wild Turkey to polar
bears. Wish me luck!

"Bill Bonde ( ``And the Lamb lies down on Broadway'' )"
wrote in message
...

execution which is what Scott Peterson should soon face.

I couldn't agree more, BUT...... the way they were talking about the jurors
that were released, I smell appeals up the ass - coming down the pike and he
may not see his just due.

I must wonder, just who is paying his lawyers fees. MG didn't come cheap!
And to keep appealing? I know freedom often comes with a hefty price - but
wow........ Just goes to show, even a high class (high cost) - "celebrity"
attorney - couldn't save his ass (at least at the onset). Maybe he needed a
"Dream team" too! They got the juice "flowing" again!

I wonder if SP has been anyone's prom queen yet?

To be honest, it is a shame - beginning with the "O.J." trial and now this
one, that people had to die to make these high class courtroom dramas unfold
and in many respects, make a mockery of the judicial system. They were more
circus atmosphere with some of the attorneys giving one liners to make
jokes - in a very serious process. HOW SICK...... I think the judges should
hold these people in contempt when they violate the respect of the deceased
and the judicial system. I've watched many other murder trials on Court TV -
you sure don't see much laughter and joking taking place. NOR are there any
lawyers trying to be comedians or movie stars. Better yet, take the damned
TV cameras back out. We all know what goes on. We've seen enough. The dead
are paying for it.

L.

"L." wrote in message
erio.net...
"Bill Bonde ( ``And the Lamb lies down on Broadway'' )"
wrote in message
...

execution which is what Scott Peterson should soon face.

I couldn't agree more, BUT...... the way they were talking about the
jurors that were released, I smell appeals up the ass - coming down the
pike and he may not see his just due.

I must wonder, just who is paying his lawyers fees. MG didn't come cheap!
And to keep appealing? I know freedom often comes with a hefty price - but
wow........ Just goes to show, even a high class (high cost) - "celebrity"
attorney - couldn't save his ass (at least at the onset). Maybe he needed
a "Dream team" too! They got the juice "flowing" again!

I wonder if SP has been anyone's prom queen yet?

To be honest, it is a shame - beginning with the "O.J." trial and now this
one, that people had to die to make these high class courtroom dramas
unfold and in many respects, make a mockery of the judicial system. They
were more circus atmosphere with some of the attorneys giving one liners
to make jokes - in a very serious process. HOW SICK...... I think the
judges should hold these people in contempt when they violate the respect
of the deceased and the judicial system. I've watched many other murder
trials on Court TV - you sure don't see much laughter and joking taking
place. NOR are there any lawyers trying to be comedians or movie stars.
Better yet, take the damned TV cameras back out. We all know what goes on.
We've seen enough. The dead are paying for it.

Great Caesar's Ghost, people. Is this is what people waste their time
watching on TV? Not enough NFL football?
Tired of WWF Wresting? Can't find American Chopper? Had your fill of Donald
Trump?

Must be since Oprah is getting bland (you know how the episode is going to
end), and Dr. Phil isn't new anymore.

The only thing missing from this media frenzy are the court room spectators
running outside twirling colored towels
as they did with the Martha Stewart trial looking like fools.

The lawyers were auditioning for roles in for The New L.A. Law or some
dambed thing.

Then there's the play by play on Larry King Live.

Next up is Michael Jackson's trial. What a circus that is going to be.

But figures..

It is Americuh.

"Larry Edwards" wrote in message
...
Scott Peterson Guilty! Are we safe now?

I lived in Blanchester Ohio a few years back. We had a murder trail without
even a body or proof she was dead. He was found guilty and sentenced to
life. I was betting they didn't have Peterson! I'm not saying he isn't
guilty, just that the proof was lacking.

"Jim" wrote in message
.. .

"Larry Edwards" wrote in message
...
Scott Peterson Guilty! Are we safe now?

I lived in Blanchester Ohio a few years back. We had a murder trail
without even a body or proof she was dead. He was found guilty and
sentenced to life. I was betting they didn't have Peterson! I'm not
saying he isn't guilty, just that the proof was lacking.

Just think, the prosecutors are usually worse criminals than those they
prosecute.

DeWayne

DeWayne wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message
.. .

"Larry Edwards" wrote in message
...
Scott Peterson Guilty! Are we safe now?

I lived in Blanchester Ohio a few years back. We had a murder trail
without even a body or proof she was dead. He was found guilty and
sentenced to life. I was betting they didn't have Peterson! I'm not
saying he isn't guilty, just that the proof was lacking.

Just think, the prosecutors are usually worse criminals than those they
prosecute.

Scott Peterson is pretty difficult to out do. Here's a guy who murdered
his wife and his unborn child.


--
"Throw me that lipstick, darling, I wanna redo my stigmata."

+-Jennifer Saunders, "Absolutely Fabulous"

"Bill Bonde ( ``And the Lamb lies down on Broadway'' )"
wrote in message
...


DeWayne wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message
.. .

"Larry Edwards" wrote in message
...
Scott Peterson Guilty! Are we safe now?

I lived in Blanchester Ohio a few years back. We had a murder trail
without even a body or proof she was dead. He was found guilty and
sentenced to life. I was betting they didn't have Peterson! I'm not
saying he isn't guilty, just that the proof was lacking.

Just think, the prosecutors are usually worse criminals than those they
prosecute.

Scott Peterson is pretty difficult to out do. Here's a guy who murdered
his wife and his unborn child.

I think I understand that you can't appreciate living in Madison Co.
Indiana.



--
"Throw me that lipstick, darling, I wanna redo my stigmata."

+-Jennifer Saunders, "Absolutely Fabulous"

"Bill Bonde ( ``And the Lamb lies down on Broadway'' )"
wrote in message
...


DeWayne wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message
.. .

"Larry Edwards" wrote in message
...
Scott Peterson Guilty! Are we safe now?

I lived in Blanchester Ohio a few years back. We had a murder trail
without even a body or proof she was dead. He was found guilty and
sentenced to life. I was betting they didn't have Peterson! I'm not
saying he isn't guilty, just that the proof was lacking.

Just think, the prosecutors are usually worse criminals than those they
prosecute.

Scott Peterson is pretty difficult to out do. Here's a guy who murdered
his wife and his unborn child.


--
"Throw me that lipstick, darling, I wanna redo my stigmata."

+-Jennifer Saunders, "Absolutely Fabulous"

Well, I feel in my heart he's guilty as can be, but then again I thought OJ
and Robert Blake were to...

"Jim" wrote in message
.. .

"Larry Edwards" wrote in message
...
Scott Peterson Guilty! Are we safe now?

I lived in Blanchester Ohio a few years back. We had a murder trail
without even a body or proof she was dead. He was found guilty and
sentenced to life. I was betting they didn't have Peterson! I'm not
saying he isn't guilty, just that the proof was lacking.


I find it pretty hard to believe that his wife and kid washed up not too far
from where he was fishing - within 2 miles - as a coincidence - if he is
innocent.

IF he were innocent, then why try to sell the home, car, and change
appearance? Not to mention all the lies on his recorded calls. Didn't take
much to convince me he was guilty as sin. HE KNEW she wasn't coming back.
Otherwise, if he was so in love with his wife, he'd have held out hope for
her return. Meaning he wouldn't have gotten rid of her vehicle, try to sell
the house, etc. THAT WAS ALL BS on his part. He didn't love that woman. He
was a cold hearted person. NEVER shedding a tear, never showing emotion. He
was cold and calculating in my opinion.

Maybe his wife and kid washing up close by was just that - a coincidence,
but very very odd. I think I'd have more of a chance of winning the power
ball than that happening by "coincidence" to him.

All circumstantial maybe, but in my opinion - all negative on him.

NOW the damned tabloids are saying there is new evidence to get him off or
something to that effect. What a crock.
They're another bunch of suck asses. Out to make a buck - on deaths of
innocent people.. SCUM RAGS. I laugh my ass off every time they're sued and
lose. They deserve it. They're no better than those clown attorneys trying
to make actors of themselves on TV. It's to hell with the dead who got me
here, let me make a buck. That sucks.

L.

"L." wrote in message
erio.net...
"Jim" wrote in message
.. .

"Larry Edwards" wrote in message
...
Scott Peterson Guilty! Are we safe now?

I lived in Blanchester Ohio a few years back. We had a murder trail
without even a body or proof she was dead. He was found guilty and
sentenced to life. I was betting they didn't have Peterson! I'm not
saying he isn't guilty, just that the proof was lacking.


I find it pretty hard to believe that his wife and kid washed up not too
far from where he was fishing - within 2 miles - as a coincidence - if he
is innocent.

IF he were innocent, then why try to sell the home, car, and change
appearance? Not to mention all the lies on his recorded calls. Didn't take
much to convince me he was guilty as sin. HE KNEW she wasn't coming back.
Otherwise, if he was so in love with his wife, he'd have held out hope for
her return. Meaning he wouldn't have gotten rid of her vehicle, try to
sell the house, etc. THAT WAS ALL BS on his part. He didn't love that
woman. He was a cold hearted person. NEVER shedding a tear, never showing
emotion. He was cold and calculating in my opinion.

Maybe his wife and kid washing up close by was just that - a coincidence,
but very very odd. I think I'd have more of a chance of winning the power
ball than that happening by "coincidence" to him.

All circumstantial maybe, but in my opinion - all negative on him.

NOW the damned tabloids are saying there is new evidence to get him off or
something to that effect. What a crock.
They're another bunch of suck asses. Out to make a buck - on deaths of
innocent people.. SCUM RAGS. I laugh my ass off every time they're sued
and lose. They deserve it. They're no better than those clown attorneys
trying to make actors of themselves on TV. It's to hell with the dead who
got me here, let me make a buck. That sucks.

L.


But still by our standards this is circumstantial.

"Jim" wrote in message
...

"L." wrote in message
erio.net...
"Jim" wrote in message
.. .

"Larry Edwards" wrote in message
...
Scott Peterson Guilty! Are we safe now?

I lived in Blanchester Ohio a few years back. We had a murder trail
without even a body or proof she was dead. He was found guilty and
sentenced to life. I was betting they didn't have Peterson! I'm not
saying he isn't guilty, just that the proof was lacking.


I find it pretty hard to believe that his wife and kid washed up not too
far from where he was fishing - within 2 miles - as a coincidence - if he
is innocent.

IF he were innocent, then why try to sell the home, car, and change
appearance? Not to mention all the lies on his recorded calls. Didn't
take much to convince me he was guilty as sin. HE KNEW she wasn't coming
back. Otherwise, if he was so in love with his wife, he'd have held out
hope for her return. Meaning he wouldn't have gotten rid of her vehicle,
try to sell the house, etc. THAT WAS ALL BS on his part. He didn't love
that woman. He was a cold hearted person. NEVER shedding a tear, never
showing emotion. He was cold and calculating in my opinion.

Maybe his wife and kid washing up close by was just that - a coincidence,
but very very odd. I think I'd have more of a chance of winning the power
ball than that happening by "coincidence" to him.

All circumstantial maybe, but in my opinion - all negative on him.

NOW the damned tabloids are saying there is new evidence to get him off
or something to that effect. What a crock.
They're another bunch of suck asses. Out to make a buck - on deaths of
innocent people.. SCUM RAGS. I laugh my ass off every time they're sued
and lose. They deserve it. They're no better than those clown attorneys
trying to make actors of themselves on TV. It's to hell with the dead who
got me here, let me make a buck. That sucks.

L.


But still by our standards this is circumstantial.



I won't argue that. I've agreed to it as well. We don't know the whole
story. We don't know what all was removed from the home - either. To my
recollection, they never did divulge that - not publicly that I'm aware of.

L.

On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 23:25:30 GMT, "DeWayne" wrote:


"Bill Bonde ( ``And the Lamb lies down on Broadway'' )"
wrote in message
...


DeWayne wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message
.. .

"Larry Edwards" wrote in message
...
Scott Peterson Guilty! Are we safe now?

I lived in Blanchester Ohio a few years back. We had a murder trail
without even a body or proof she was dead. He was found guilty and
sentenced to life. I was betting they didn't have Peterson! I'm not
saying he isn't guilty, just that the proof was lacking.

Just think, the prosecutors are usually worse criminals than those they
prosecute.

Scott Peterson is pretty difficult to out do. Here's a guy who murdered
his wife and his unborn child.

I think I understand that you can't appreciate living in Madison Co.
Indiana.


I think you are assuming that the rest of the world has some idea of
what you are talking about. You would be wrong to make that
assumption.

Safe from what? Scott? I would say I feel pretty safe from old Scott.
Bye Scott.

Mike Burch mentioned in passing :

Safe from what?

Safe from having to see his horsefaced mistress every time we turn on
the news.


--
Sam-I-Am
A person never tells you anything until contradicted.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.794 / Virus Database: 538 - Release Date: 11/10/04

Sam wrote:

Mike Burch mentioned in passing :

Safe from what?

Safe from having to see his horsefaced mistress every time we turn on
the news.

Come on, Camilla isn't that bad! Oh, you meant the guy in California.
Never mind.

--
Cheers,
Bev
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++
"History I believe furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people
maintaining a free civil government."
-- letter from Thomas Jefferson to Baron vonHumboldt, 1813

The Real Bev mentioned in passing :

Sam wrote:

Mike Burch mentioned in passing :

Safe from what?

Safe from having to see his horsefaced mistress every time we
turn on the news.

Come on, Camilla isn't that bad! Oh, you meant the guy in California.

No, I was talking about John Edwards and his horsefaced mistress.

--
Sam-I-Am
Every man creates a certain psychological security, unaware of the fact
that his security is his prison... Your prison cell becomes smaller;
you start living so much protected that life itself becomes impossible.
Life is possible only in insecurity.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.794 / Virus Database: 538 - Release Date: 11/10/04

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:28:57 -0500, Larry Edwards
wrote:

Scott Peterson Guilty! Are we safe now?

This case as to the murder of a beautiful woman with a fetus by her
husband upset me from the beginning. I avoided reading or hearing
broadcasts.

My question here is why were the two jurors dismissed? Were they
splitting hairs on how absolute the evidence must be as is reflected
in this thread?

PaPaPeng wrote:

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:28:57 -0500, Larry Edwards
wrote:

Scott Peterson Guilty! Are we safe now?

This case as to the murder of a beautiful woman with a fetus by her
husband upset me from the beginning. I avoided reading or hearing
broadcasts.

My question here is why were the two jurors dismissed? Were they
splitting hairs on how absolute the evidence must be as is reflected
in this thread?

One was seen in conversation with one of Peterson's relatives (something
like that, anyway). The second was doing individual study on SOMETHING
-- you're only supposed to consider evidence that was presented in
court, not play detective. Not known why the foreman was dismissed, the
judge won't reveal that until after sentencing.

--
Cheers,
Bev
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"The way England treats her prisoners, she doesn't
deserve to have any." --Oscar Wilde

On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 18:06:52 -0500, "Sam" wrote:

Safe from having to see his horsefaced mistress every time we
turn on the news.

Come on, Camilla isn't that bad! Oh, you meant the guy in California.

No, I was talking about John Edwards and his horsefaced mistress.

I dunno you guys ....... do you know how many women reading this are
looking i nthe mirror right now and wondering ....??

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 00:30:57 GMT, PaPaPeng wrote:

My question here is why were the two jurors dismissed? Were they
splitting hairs on how absolute the evidence must be as is reflected
in this thread?

They both objected when everyone starting calling the mistress
"horse-faced."

"PaPaPeng" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:28:57 -0500, Larry Edwards
wrote:

Scott Peterson Guilty! Are we safe now?

This case as to the murder of a beautiful woman with a fetus by her
husband upset me from the beginning. I avoided reading or hearing
broadcasts.

My question here is why were the two jurors dismissed? Were they
splitting hairs on how absolute the evidence must be as is reflected
in this thread?


Good questions that will be answered when they feel ready to tell us. The
"answers" could have a detrimental effect on the findings and sentencing in
the long run. So, they'll be looking at it very carefully.

TBA

On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 06:37:50 GMT, "Paul Keenleyside"
wrote:


The only thing missing from this media frenzy are the court room spectators
running outside twirling colored towels
as they did with the Martha Stewart trial looking like fools.


The real scum are the ones who pursueed his mother as she
left, yelling "Guilty. Guilty." Those are the *******s I want to see
in the lowest pit of Hell.

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 06:37:50 GMT, "Paul Keenleyside"
wrote:


The only thing missing from this media frenzy are the court room
spectators
running outside twirling colored towels
as they did with the Martha Stewart trial looking like fools.


The real scum are the ones who pursueed his mother as she
left, yelling "Guilty. Guilty." Those are the *******s I want to see
in the lowest pit of Hell.

As much as I wanted to see SP found Guilty, I have to agree with this last
statement. That isn't right. Hearing it the first time was bad enough. She
most likely had it echoing in her head without them repeating it. They can
be sick *******s! But, I must wonder where SP's father was - not present at
the verdict reading. Has anyone heard? Last I heard, no one knew. You would
think he would want to be there.

TBA

"Sam" wrote in message
...
The Real Bev mentioned in passing :

Sam wrote:

Mike Burch mentioned in passing :

Safe from what?

Safe from having to see his horsefaced mistress every time we
turn on the news.

Come on, Camilla isn't that bad! Oh, you meant the guy in California.

No, I was talking about John Edwards and his horsefaced mistress.

Kerry?


--
Sam-I-Am
Every man creates a certain psychological security, unaware of the fact
that his security is his prison... Your prison cell becomes smaller;
you start living so much protected that life itself becomes impossible.
Life is possible only in insecurity.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.794 / Virus Database: 538 - Release Date: 11/10/04