"Jeff" wrote in message
news:kEmDd.28049$3m6.2486@attbi_s51...

"Never anonymous Bud" wrote in message
...
Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, "Jeff"
on Fri, 07 Jan 2005
01:27:21 GMT spoke:

Second of all there is no HUGE,, HUGE difference in db's
of attenuation between RG 6 and 9913.

Horsefeathers.

The "average" db of attenuation for 9913 per 100' from 1mhz to 1ghz is
2.17
db. The "average" atenuation for RG 6 per 100' from 1mhz. to 1ghz is
3.2 db.

MUCH more horsefeathers.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------

My I am ever so impressed with someone that has nothing
intelligent
to say and says it in such a quaint way. No I dont speak horsefeathers and
yes
the truth is out there. Try
http://www.radio-ware.com/products/t...o/coaxloss.htm
and do the math yourself, providing you know how to figure averages. The
difference IS insignificant, for runs under 100',, if you choose to not
believe
it, thats your problem.

Jeff

Averages are perhaps meaningful if the process is linear- however,
attenuation vs freq is not linear and that is why one does not speak of loss
averages- you won't find it in the literature.
2nd- 1mhz is millihertz= 0.001 Hz. You likely mean MHz.

Dale W4OP