Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
They're like apples, and oranges! Two completely different types of radios.
As mentioned before, the PRO-96 has trunk-tracking, and digital capabilities, whereas the AR8200 does not. The PRO-96 is more of a "scanner". The AR8200 is more of a communications receiver. I think you need to buy both, to be totally happy! Bill Crocker "RSL" wrote in message news:CDG6e.6323$%c1.3141@fed1read05... I am still looking at many hand held scanner options like the Icom R-20, Uniden Portable BC296 , also the Radio Shack Pro-96 ( I like this so far) and the AOR AR8200 Mark 3. I have several AOR radio now like the AR3030 and the AR7030 Short Wave Receivers. I wanted to get this groups opinion related to how the Radio Shack PRO-96 and the AR8200 compare?? Other then a $150.00 price difference. Thanks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mark Time SF Audio Awards | Broadcasting | |||
FA: Hallicrafters SX-62A Mark 2A Receiver | Swap | |||
The Mark Of The Beast | Shortwave | |||
FYI: FSK Mark and Space (Was Tuning Beacons) | Homebrew | |||
FYI: FSK Mark and Space (Was Tuning Beacons) | Homebrew |