RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Scanner (https://www.radiobanter.com/scanner/)
-   -   "Whip" vs. "Rubber Duckie" (https://www.radiobanter.com/scanner/72037-%22whip%22-vs-%22rubber-duckie%22.html)

russ May 31st 05 10:17 PM

"Whip" vs. "Rubber Duckie"
 
Will replacing my scanner's included "rubber-duckie" antenna with a
"whip" antenna or a longer "rubber-duckie" improve reception?

Thank you,
Russ


Bill Crocker May 31st 05 10:50 PM

Typically the longer whip antenna will do more for VHF-Low, ie; 25~50MHz.
You can also optimize it for various bands by changing it's length, (if its
a telescoping whip), shorter for higher frequencies, longer for lower
frequencies. The rubber-ducky is typically more of a wide-band antenna,
that provides mediocre performance across the spectrum, but is shorter, and
flexible. I've always been afraid of damaging a hand-held scanner when
using a telescoping whip, because it's more rigid, and could break the BNC
mount in the radio. You can also buy rubber-ducky antennas that are
optimized for one band. Radio Shack carries a good one for the 800MHz band,
that seems to work very well down into the 450MHz band as well.

Bill Crocker

"russ" wrote in message
oups.com...
Will replacing my scanner's included "rubber-duckie" antenna with a
"whip" antenna or a longer "rubber-duckie" improve reception?

Thank you,
Russ





All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com