Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Dave!
I think it's super that you are continuing to enhance your software. Do you want us to respond in the newsgroup, or do you have an email address you'd like us to use? Thanks, Bill Crocker "Dave" wrote in message ... Hello, I'm in the process of writing a new Windows based audio recorder and would like to find out how people feel about some of the features I am thinking of including. If people who use software VOX recorders could tell me how they feel about whether some features I am considering adding are useful, it would help me to make the new software better. This is an informal survey and I know many people hate surveys. But if you can help provide some answers to my questions, I can use this info to make my recorder better. A competitor can use this info too, to make their product better. Everybody wins if everyone knows what people expect to see in a recorder. I've already published a free VOX recorder for almost 10 years but didn't put many features on it that people have been asking for since I first wrote it. It was too hard to modify since it wasn't designed with all the desired features in mind at the beginning. ------------------- Here's some of the features I want to add and was wondering whether these are useful enough for people to want to pay a small amount for....(if you don't mind helping, I would really appreciate it). ++++++++ If you could indicate a YES or NO for each feature I listed that would be a great help. *** The ability to separate VOX events into separate files for each event. As well as dividing the files by time-span or time of day. And of course that requires an auto-file-naming capability. *** A Review Button: Pushing a button in order to hear the last VOX event that was captured. (or the last 30 seconds, rather). The audio would have to be kept in memory and so it would have a limited length. *** A repeating clock/calendar to control automatic starts and stops like a VCR has. *** Splitting the stereo content into two mono output files and allowing a separate VOX setting for each mono output file. *** Having the ability to record .wav files with more than 2 stereo channels, (such as 4 channels) I think this might require MS Direct Show....but am not sure yet. *** .MP3 file output format....in addition to the native mp3 support MS already has for .WAV files. *** A spectrum analyzer for viewing on the front panel during a recording or while monitoring the audio input. *** A complex looking (busy) style of display with lots of blinking lights, clocks, meters, log and stats all to make it look sophisticated like a lot of receiver panels look. or *** A simple basic looking display style with nothing but the very basic controls. or *** both types of panel formats with a switch to change them. This next question is not an easy one, but I'm wondering how much people would pay for a recorder that they think is a very good piece of softwa *** $5 to $10 USD price range *** $10 to $20 USD price range *** $20 to $50 USD price range *** above $50 USD if it has everything imaginable included. Not very scientific, I know.... -------------------------- I didn't include a full feature list here because there are some things that obviously need to be part of a recorder, like a log file and an auto-start recording control. But some of the features I listed will take some effort to produce and I want to avoid wasting a lot of time writing code that will not be used much. Feel free to add the features you need to have that I did not mention, if you think it'll be widely needed by others too. And thanks in advance for helping! Dave (Author of Scanner Recorder and Scanner Recorder Pro) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The FAQ (Well, Question 1, at least) | Homebrew | |||
The FAQ (Well, Question 1, at least) | General | |||
W6ELProp Software Questions | Shortwave | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy |