Heard on BBC
 

dxAce wrote:

"R.F. Burns" wrote:

Brian Hill wrote:

It's never their fault Steve. It's always somebody else's.
Well, I see you and the fake ace have kissed and made up. Thought you
were too smart to be a dxDingleberry sock puppet again. How disappointing.

P.S.

I said nothing about 'fault'; however, seeing as -you- brought it up,
tell us then, whose fault you think it is that after almost 4 years,
Baghdad is -still- not under control.

I believe Bush is the "Commander-in-Chief", that the buck was supposed
to stop with him and that he made the BIG show (eyewash for the
sheeple?) of saying "mission accomplished".

The Bushevik-in-Chief really underestimated what was going to happen
after the invasion and that lies right on his square head. Invading
troops to be greeted with flowers and candy? Get a grip on reality.

I think that Curious George needs to go work at a morgue or two in
Baghdad to realize just how badly he screwed up.

JB


You Liberal 'tards sure are hung up on that "mission accomplished" thing, aren't
you?

The DNC needs a new playbook.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Heard on BBC
 

On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 03:26:50 GMT, John Barnard wrote:



I think that Curious George needs to go work at a morgue or two in
Baghdad to realize just how badly he screwed up.

His erection would get in the way. The man has a death fetish.

Heard on BBC
 

John Barnard wrote in
news:_XUzg.305331$Mn5.273150@pd7tw3no:

dxAce wrote:

"R.F. Burns" wrote:

Brian Hill wrote:

It's never their fault Steve. It's always somebody else's.
Well, I see you and the fake ace have kissed and made up. Thought you
were too smart to be a dxDingleberry sock puppet again. How
disappointing.

P.S.

I said nothing about 'fault'; however, seeing as -you- brought it up,
tell us then, whose fault you think it is that after almost 4 years,
Baghdad is -still- not under control.

I believe Bush is the "Commander-in-Chief", that the buck was supposed
to stop with him and that he made the BIG show (eyewash for the
sheeple?) of saying "mission accomplished".

The Bushevik-in-Chief really underestimated what was going to happen
after the invasion and that lies right on his square head. Invading
troops to be greeted with flowers and candy? Get a grip on reality.

I think that Curious George needs to go work at a morgue or two in
Baghdad to realize just how badly he screwed up.

JB


Screwed up? No. He would see that the morgues have fewer people now that
Sadam is gone. I really wish you dip****s north of the border had more
than one working brain cell.

sc

Heard on BBC
 

John Barnard wrote:

Slow Code wrote:
John Barnard wrote in
news:_XUzg.305331$Mn5.273150@pd7tw3no:

dxAce wrote:
"R.F. Burns" wrote:

Brian Hill wrote:

It's never their fault Steve. It's always somebody else's.
Well, I see you and the fake ace have kissed and made up. Thought you
were too smart to be a dxDingleberry sock puppet again. How
disappointing.

P.S.

I said nothing about 'fault'; however, seeing as -you- brought it up,
tell us then, whose fault you think it is that after almost 4 years,
Baghdad is -still- not under control.

I believe Bush is the "Commander-in-Chief", that the buck was supposed
to stop with him and that he made the BIG show (eyewash for the
sheeple?) of saying "mission accomplished".
The Bushevik-in-Chief really underestimated what was going to happen
after the invasion and that lies right on his square head. Invading
troops to be greeted with flowers and candy? Get a grip on reality.

I think that Curious George needs to go work at a morgue or two in
Baghdad to realize just how badly he screwed up.

JB


Screwed up? No. He would see that the morgues have fewer people now that
Sadam is gone. I really wish you dip****s north of the border had more
than one working brain cell.

sc

Hussein was bad - no doubt about it. But there sure as hell wasn't any
sectarian violence, car bombers, people being pulled from their cars and
executed. Don't even try and convince me that the level of violence is
the same as when he was in power. Everyone from the average person to
American military officers realizes that what is happening now is
essentially a civil war.

I wish that you 29% had a grip on reality!

I wish 99.9% of you ****in dumbass Canucks would get a clue, boy!

LMFAO

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Heard on BBC
 

John Barnard wrote:
Slow Code wrote:
John Barnard wrote in
news:_XUzg.305331$Mn5.273150@pd7tw3no:


sc

Hussein was bad - no doubt about it. But there sure as hell wasn't any
sectarian violence, car bombers, people being pulled from their cars and
executed. Don't even try and convince me that the level of violence is
the same as when he was in power. Everyone from the average person to
American military officers realizes that what is happening now is
essentially a civil war.
depends on what you see as violence Saddams Butchers did their killing
in a tidier fashion than the various factions are now but SADDAM killed
10 k plus per year

the body is lower if messier as they try to sort out a new order

I wish that you 29% had a grip on reality!

JB

Heard on BBC
 

Nawwwwww,,,, I wont say that one either.
cuhulin

Heard on BBC
 

On 2 Aug 2006 18:16:11 -0700, "an_old_friend"
wrote:
SADDAM killed
10 k plus per year
How many do you think are being killed these days? What's 100 X 365?

Heard on BBC
 

David wrote:
On 2 Aug 2006 18:16:11 -0700, "an_old_friend"
wrote:
SADDAM killed
10 k plus per year
How many do you think are being killed these days? What's 100 X 365?
but those aren't the numbers dave

Heard on BBC
 

On 2 Aug 2006 20:18:08 -0700, "an old feind"
wrote:


David wrote:
On 2 Aug 2006 18:16:11 -0700, "an_old_friend"
wrote:
SADDAM killed
10 k plus per year
How many do you think are being killed these days? What's 100 X 365?
but those aren't the numbers dave

Are too.

http://news.netscape.com/story/2006/...raqis-per-day/

Heard on BBC
 

John Barnard wrote in
news:uGbAg.307567$Mn5.204424@pd7tw3no:

Slow Code wrote:
John Barnard wrote in
news:_XUzg.305331$Mn5.273150@pd7tw3no:

dxAce wrote:
"R.F. Burns" wrote:

Brian Hill wrote:

It's never their fault Steve. It's always somebody else's.
Well, I see you and the fake ace have kissed and made up. Thought
you were too smart to be a dxDingleberry sock puppet again. How
disappointing.

P.S.

I said nothing about 'fault'; however, seeing as -you- brought it
up, tell us then, whose fault you think it is that after almost 4
years, Baghdad is -still- not under control.

I believe Bush is the "Commander-in-Chief", that the buck was
supposed to stop with him and that he made the BIG show (eyewash for
the sheeple?) of saying "mission accomplished".
The Bushevik-in-Chief really underestimated what was going to happen
after the invasion and that lies right on his square head. Invading
troops to be greeted with flowers and candy? Get a grip on reality.

I think that Curious George needs to go work at a morgue or two in
Baghdad to realize just how badly he screwed up.

JB


Screwed up? No. He would see that the morgues have fewer people now
that Sadam is gone. I really wish you dip****s north of the border had
more than one working brain cell.

sc

Hussein was bad - no doubt about it. But there sure as hell wasn't any
sectarian violence, car bombers, people being pulled from their cars and
executed. Don't even try and convince me that the level of violence is
the same as when he was in power. Everyone from the average person to
American military officers realizes that what is happening now is
essentially a civil war.

I wish that you 29% had a grip on reality!

JB



We do grasp reality. It's just that you KKKanadians have your
heads so far up your ass you can't see it.

Sc

Heard on BBC
 

an_old_friend wrote:
John Barnard wrote:
Slow Code wrote:
John Barnard wrote in
news:_XUzg.305331$Mn5.273150@pd7tw3no:


sc

Hussein was bad - no doubt about it. But there sure as hell wasn't any
sectarian violence, car bombers, people being pulled from their cars and
executed. Don't even try and convince me that the level of violence is
the same as when he was in power. Everyone from the average person to
American military officers realizes that what is happening now is
essentially a civil war.
depends on what you see as violence Saddams Butchers did their killing
in a tidier fashion than the various factions are now but SADDAM killed
10 k plus per year

The problem right now is that the American military is conceding that
Iraq is in a state of civil war. Iraq is a country that can only be held
together by a strong central leadership. The situation is reminiscent of
how Yugoslavia fell apart into regional in-fighting after Tito's death.

The situation in Iraq can only get worse and not better.

JB



the body is lower if messier as they try to sort out a new order
I wish that you 29% had a grip on reality!

JB

Heard on BBC
 

Slow Code wrote:
John Barnard wrote in
news:uGbAg.307567$Mn5.204424@pd7tw3no:

Slow Code wrote:
John Barnard wrote in
news:_XUzg.305331$Mn5.273150@pd7tw3no:

dxAce wrote:
"R.F. Burns" wrote:

Brian Hill wrote:

It's never their fault Steve. It's always somebody else's.
Well, I see you and the fake ace have kissed and made up. Thought
you were too smart to be a dxDingleberry sock puppet again. How
disappointing.

P.S.

I said nothing about 'fault'; however, seeing as -you- brought it
up, tell us then, whose fault you think it is that after almost 4
years, Baghdad is -still- not under control.

I believe Bush is the "Commander-in-Chief", that the buck was
supposed to stop with him and that he made the BIG show (eyewash for
the sheeple?) of saying "mission accomplished".
The Bushevik-in-Chief really underestimated what was going to happen
after the invasion and that lies right on his square head. Invading
troops to be greeted with flowers and candy? Get a grip on reality.

I think that Curious George needs to go work at a morgue or two in
Baghdad to realize just how badly he screwed up.

JB

Screwed up? No. He would see that the morgues have fewer people now
that Sadam is gone. I really wish you dip****s north of the border had
more than one working brain cell.

sc

Hussein was bad - no doubt about it. But there sure as hell wasn't any
sectarian violence, car bombers, people being pulled from their cars and
executed. Don't even try and convince me that the level of violence is
the same as when he was in power. Everyone from the average person to
American military officers realizes that what is happening now is
essentially a civil war.

I wish that you 29% had a grip on reality!

JB



We do grasp reality. It's just that you KKKanadians have your
heads so far up your ass you can't see it.

Sc



In what sort of screwed-up reality is driving a country into civil war
supposed to accomplish?

Your leadership was saying that you were going to be greeted with
flowers and candy? Grasp of reality? Bush must have been snorting that day!

JB

Heard on BBC
 

Then why dont y'all Canadians give us a hand with Iraq instead of
sitting there and wringing your mitts and whineing and moaning and
crying? Do y'all think those terrorist dont know where Canada is? Do
y'all really think those terrorist will lay off of Canada?
cuhulin

Heard on BBC
 

Heard on BBC
 

John Barnard wrote:

wrote:
Then why dont y'all Canadians give us a hand with Iraq instead of
sitting there and wringing your mitts and whineing and moaning and
crying? Do y'all think those terrorist dont know where Canada is? Do
y'all really think those terrorist will lay off of Canada?
cuhulin


The only terrorist in this whole mess is sitting in the White House.

Only proving yet again that you are indeed a dumbass Canuck!

LMFAO

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Heard on BBC
 

John Barnard wrote in
news:STyBg.324004$iF6.171836@pd7tw2no:

Slow Code wrote:
John Barnard wrote in
news:uGbAg.307567$Mn5.204424@pd7tw3no:

Slow Code wrote:
John Barnard wrote in
news:_XUzg.305331$Mn5.273150@pd7tw3no:

dxAce wrote:
"R.F. Burns" wrote:

Brian Hill wrote:

It's never their fault Steve. It's always somebody else's.
Well, I see you and the fake ace have kissed and made up. Thought
you were too smart to be a dxDingleberry sock puppet again. How
disappointing.

P.S.

I said nothing about 'fault'; however, seeing as -you- brought it
up, tell us then, whose fault you think it is that after almost 4
years, Baghdad is -still- not under control.

I believe Bush is the "Commander-in-Chief", that the buck was
supposed to stop with him and that he made the BIG show (eyewash
for the sheeple?) of saying "mission accomplished".
The Bushevik-in-Chief really underestimated what was going to happen
after the invasion and that lies right on his square head. Invading
troops to be greeted with flowers and candy? Get a grip on reality.

I think that Curious George needs to go work at a morgue or two in
Baghdad to realize just how badly he screwed up.

JB

Screwed up? No. He would see that the morgues have fewer people now
that Sadam is gone. I really wish you dip****s north of the border
had more than one working brain cell.

sc

Hussein was bad - no doubt about it. But there sure as hell wasn't any
sectarian violence, car bombers, people being pulled from their cars
and executed. Don't even try and convince me that the level of
violence is the same as when he was in power. Everyone from the
average person to American military officers realizes that what is
happening now is essentially a civil war.

I wish that you 29% had a grip on reality!

JB



We do grasp reality. It's just that you KKKanadians have your
heads so far up your ass you can't see it.

Sc



In what sort of screwed-up reality is driving a country into civil war
supposed to accomplish?

Your leadership was saying that you were going to be greeted with
flowers and candy? Grasp of reality? Bush must have been snorting that
day!

JB


Just a little more clean up. Everything will be OK.

SC

Heard on BBC
 

John Barnard wrote in
news:6PLBg.334153$IK3.111052@pd7tw1no:

wrote:
Then why dont y'all Canadians give us a hand with Iraq instead of
sitting there and wringing your mitts and whineing and moaning and
crying? Do y'all think those terrorist dont know where Canada is? Do
y'all really think those terrorist will lay off of Canada?
cuhulin


The only terrorist in this whole mess is sitting in the White House.

JB


You KKKanadians and the democrats are just upset he's killing your
friends.

Sc

Heard on BBC
 

Another Suspect Arrested in Toronto Terror Plot.
www.homelandsecurityus.com
cuhulin

Heard on BBC
 

Slow Code wrote:

You KKKanadians and the democrats are just upset he's killing your
friends.

My, my. How convenient of you to overlook the death or maiming of the
sons and daughters of America.

And, sadly, it's all for naught.

Seeing as you advertise you are slow, I will type the following real slooow.

As of August 7, 2006, the O-F-F-I-C-I-A-L position of the administration
is: NO WMDs. Don't quote me any web addresses or give me your -opinion-;
the OFFICIAL -government- position is "NO WMDs".

The whole "yellowcake" episode has been proven, time and again, to be a
fraud and a FORGERY.

NONE (as in ZERO) of the 9/11 mad dogs were from Iraq and they STILL
aren't from Iraq.

Saddam did NOT support Bin Laden; Saddam was for a secular government
and Osama was for a ultraconservative religious government---they were
at -opposite- ends of the political spectrum.

This whole "war" is BULL**** and sadly, people on both sides are dying
for nothing.

Joe from Kokomo

Heard on BBC
 

Slow Code wrote:

Just a little more clean up. Everything will be OK.

Just "a little more clean up"?? Well into the -FOURTH- year??

and "Everything will be OK."??

How naive of you.

Didn't you see the Congressional hearings the other day, where the
big-shot Generals themselves were hemming and hawing about being in the
middle of a civil war? (Gee, big surprise, right? I mean, its only been
going on for a thousand years or so).

Didn't you hear Bush himself say we will be there for at least two more
years?? Six years is just "a little more clean up"?

BTW, I -almost- feel sorry for the generals--they seem to be finally
getting a clue as to which way things are heading, but being in fear of
their masters in Washington and not wanting to put an early end to their
juicy pensions, they are afraid to tell the Emperors in DC that they are
wearing no clothes.

Joe from Kokomo

Heard on BBC
 

In article ,
Joe from Kokomo wrote:

Slow Code wrote:

Just a little more clean up. Everything will be OK.

Just "a little more clean up"?? Well into the -FOURTH- year??

and "Everything will be OK."??

How naive of you.

Snip

Do you have any idea how stupid you look posting off topic political
stuff for the most part to this news group? I didn't think so.

Plonk

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Heard on BBC
 

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
Joe from Kokomo wrote:

Slow Code wrote:

Just a little more clean up. Everything will be OK.
Just "a little more clean up"?? Well into the -FOURTH- year??

and "Everything will be OK."??

How naive of you.

Snip

Do you have any idea how stupid you look posting off topic political
stuff for the most part to this news group? I didn't think so.

First, to set the record straight, this response (and most of them) are
in reply to -already existing- posts by others (in this case, Slow Code).

Finally, do you have any idea how stupid -you- look being a
hypocritical, pompous jackass of a self-elected net cop? I didn't think so.

Joe from Kokomo

Heard on BBC
 

Telamon wrote in
:

In article ,
Joe from Kokomo wrote:

Slow Code wrote:

Just a little more clean up. Everything will be OK.

Just "a little more clean up"?? Well into the -FOURTH- year??

and "Everything will be OK."??

How naive of you.

Snip

Do you have any idea how stupid you look posting off topic political
stuff for the most part to this news group? I didn't think so.

Plonk


ROFLMAO

Heard on BBC
 

Joe from Kokomo wrote in
:

Slow Code wrote:

You KKKanadians and the democrats are just upset he's killing your
friends.

My, my. How convenient of you to overlook the death or maiming of the
sons and daughters of America.

And, sadly, it's all for naught.

Seeing as you advertise you are slow, I will type the following real
slooow.

As of August 7, 2006, the O-F-F-I-C-I-A-L position of the administration
is: NO WMDs. Don't quote me any web addresses or give me your -opinion-;
the OFFICIAL -government- position is "NO WMDs".

The whole "yellowcake" episode has been proven, time and again, to be a
fraud and a FORGERY.

NONE (as in ZERO) of the 9/11 mad dogs were from Iraq and they STILL
aren't from Iraq.

Saddam did NOT support Bin Laden; Saddam was for a secular government
and Osama was for a ultraconservative religious government---they were
at -opposite- ends of the political spectrum.

This whole "war" is BULL**** and sadly, people on both sides are dying
for nothing.

Joe from Kokomo



Awww-Jeez, Not this **** again.

Sc

Heard on BBC
 

John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
Joe from Kokomo wrote:

Slow Code wrote:

Just a little more clean up. Everything will be OK.
Just "a little more clean up"?? Well into the -FOURTH- year??

and "Everything will be OK."??

How naive of you.

Snip

Do you have any idea how stupid you look posting off topic political
stuff for the most part to this news group? I didn't think so.

Plonk

Do you think of how stupid you look trying to divorce politics from
shortwave? Do you truly believe that much of this hasn't been hashed
over every form of communications medium available including shortwave?

Spare us your hypocrisy!

Spare us your frickin dumbass Canuck bull****.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Heard on BBC
 

"John Barnard" wrote in message
news:FraCg.363249$IK3.64851@pd7tw1no...
Telamon wrote:
In article ,
Joe from Kokomo wrote:

Slow Code wrote:

Just a little more clean up. Everything will be OK.
Just "a little more clean up"?? Well into the -FOURTH- year??

and "Everything will be OK."??

How naive of you.

Snip

Do you have any idea how stupid you look posting off topic
political
stuff for the most part to this news group? I didn't think so.

Plonk

Do you think of how stupid you look trying to divorce politics from
shortwave? Do you truly believe that much of this hasn't been hashed
over every form of communications medium available including
shortwave?

Spare us your hypocrisy!

No one's keeping people from going over
to soc or talk newsgroups and discussing
politics there; that's what those newsgroups
are for.

Telamon is right that if you feel you have
the right to spout off about it, people also
have the right to not listen. If a user is
constantly changing e-mail addresses
to make sure that they are heard, then
people will simply go away and you're
left talking to a wall.

Sports are found just as easily on shortwave,
but you hardly ever hear it mentioned here
at even close to the frequency that you
do with politics. Same thing happens with
music.

Maybe I should start crossposting NFL and
rugby and cricket news to compensate for
the political news.

--Mike L.

Heard on BBC
 

John Barnard wrote in
news:BoaCg.363209$IK3.254749@pd7tw1no:

Slow Code wrote:
Joe from Kokomo wrote in
:

Slow Code wrote:

You KKKanadians and the democrats are just upset he's killing your
friends.
My, my. How convenient of you to overlook the death or maiming of the
sons and daughters of America.

And, sadly, it's all for naught.

Seeing as you advertise you are slow, I will type the following real
slooow.

As of August 7, 2006, the O-F-F-I-C-I-A-L position of the
administration is: NO WMDs. Don't quote me any web addresses or give
me your -opinion-; the OFFICIAL -government- position is "NO WMDs".

The whole "yellowcake" episode has been proven, time and again, to be
a fraud and a FORGERY.

NONE (as in ZERO) of the 9/11 mad dogs were from Iraq and they STILL
aren't from Iraq.

Saddam did NOT support Bin Laden; Saddam was for a secular government
and Osama was for a ultraconservative religious government---they were
at -opposite- ends of the political spectrum.

This whole "war" is BULL**** and sadly, people on both sides are dying
for nothing.

Joe from Kokomo



Awww-Jeez, Not this **** again.

Sc


Please just shorten the "Slow Code" to "Slow"; it'll be more reflective
of who you are. Can you not reply intelligently to any of the
aforementioned points? Or does that process escape you completely?

JB


No point in arguing. You prefer the taste of Liberal Bull**** more than
the truth, so seeing the facts all over again probably won't make you
change your brain cell.

Sc

Heard on BBC
 

On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 23:19:16 GMT, Slow Code wrote:


No point in arguing. You prefer the taste of Liberal Bull**** more than
the truth, so seeing the facts all over again probably won't make you
change your brain cell.

Truth and facts are 2 different things.

Heard on BBC
 

David wrote:
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 23:19:16 GMT, Slow Code wrote:


No point in arguing. You prefer the taste of Liberal Bull**** more than
the truth, so seeing the facts all over again probably won't make you
change your brain cell.

Truth and facts are 2 different things.

Indeed! After all, the victors do tend to re-write history.

JB

Heard on BBC
 

Slow Code wrote:
John Barnard wrote in
news:BoaCg.363209$IK3.254749@pd7tw1no:

Slow Code wrote:
Joe from Kokomo wrote in
:

Slow Code wrote:

You KKKanadians and the democrats are just upset he's killing your
friends.
My, my. How convenient of you to overlook the death or maiming of the
sons and daughters of America.

And, sadly, it's all for naught.

Seeing as you advertise you are slow, I will type the following real
slooow.

As of August 7, 2006, the O-F-F-I-C-I-A-L position of the
administration is: NO WMDs. Don't quote me any web addresses or give
me your -opinion-; the OFFICIAL -government- position is "NO WMDs".

The whole "yellowcake" episode has been proven, time and again, to be
a fraud and a FORGERY.

NONE (as in ZERO) of the 9/11 mad dogs were from Iraq and they STILL
aren't from Iraq.

Saddam did NOT support Bin Laden; Saddam was for a secular government
and Osama was for a ultraconservative religious government---they were
at -opposite- ends of the political spectrum.

This whole "war" is BULL**** and sadly, people on both sides are dying
for nothing.

Joe from Kokomo


Awww-Jeez, Not this **** again.

Sc


Please just shorten the "Slow Code" to "Slow"; it'll be more reflective
of who you are. Can you not reply intelligently to any of the
aforementioned points? Or does that process escape you completely?

JB


No point in arguing. You prefer the taste of Liberal Bull**** more than
the truth, so seeing the facts all over again probably won't make you
change your brain cell.

Sc




The effective translation of your statement is that you don't have a clue.

JB

Heard on BBC
 

I just now emailed the Iranian President.When I clicked on Submit,it
came back,Your message has been sent!
cuhulin

Heard on BBC
 

I once emailed (a few years ago) the London,England cops.They never
bothered to reply to me.As part of her job,that married Irish woman
wayyyyyyy over yonder in Bognor Regis,England is sort of with the cops
over there.Sometimes I am supprised she hasen't turned me in.But she
knows I am a harmless auld bastid.
cuhulin

Heard on BBC
 

Michael Lawson wrote:
"John Barnard" wrote in message
news:FraCg.363249$IK3.64851@pd7tw1no...
Telamon wrote:
In article ,
Joe from Kokomo wrote:

Slow Code wrote:

Just a little more clean up. Everything will be OK.
Just "a little more clean up"?? Well into the -FOURTH- year??

and "Everything will be OK."??

How naive of you.
Snip

Do you have any idea how stupid you look posting off topic
political
stuff for the most part to this news group? I didn't think so.

Plonk

Do you think of how stupid you look trying to divorce politics from
shortwave? Do you truly believe that much of this hasn't been hashed
over every form of communications medium available including
shortwave?
Spare us your hypocrisy!

No one's keeping people from going over
to soc or talk newsgroups and discussing
politics there; that's what those newsgroups
are for.

All of what you say is true but Telamon's robe isn't pearly white on the
posting of off-topic items and his "plonk" seems to be remarkably
selective at times. So selective one might say that it is
politically-based ;-).


Telamon is right that if you feel you have
the right to spout off about it, people also
have the right to not listen. If a user is
constantly changing e-mail addresses
to make sure that they are heard, then
people will simply go away and you're
left talking to a wall.

No argument about not having to listen. Just put the person in a
killfile and be done with it. It's his public display of the fact that
is rather interesting and attempts to convey the illusion that he is the
rec.radio.shortwave netkkkop. He isn't and never will be. If he wants
control that badly then let him start his own newsgroup and moderate it.


Sports are found just as easily on shortwave,
but you hardly ever hear it mentioned here
at even close to the frequency that you
do with politics. Same thing happens with
music.

That's the crux of the matter - he's deciding, and, by posting in
public, what he feels is relevant to this newsgroup. No one has that
control over this newsgroup. End of story. I feel that everything from
solar physics to electronics to politics to music to sports to shack
set-ups and everything in between are relevant to this newsgroup.


Maybe I should start crossposting NFL and
rugby and cricket news to compensate for
the political news.


I have no problem with that particularly when reception conditions are
miserable ;-)
--Mike L.




Thank you for the intelligent discussion!

JB

Heard on BBC
 

She is really peed off that I want to dress up like a woman.
cuhulin

Heard on BBC
 

David wrote in
:

On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 23:19:16 GMT, Slow Code wrote:


No point in arguing. You prefer the taste of Liberal Bull**** more than
the truth, so seeing the facts all over again probably won't make you
change your brain cell.

Truth and facts are 2 different things.


And the fact you choose to ignore the truth doesn't make the truth false.

Sc

Heard on BBC
 

John Barnard wrote in
news:cvQCg.364670$Mn5.328527@pd7tw3no:

Slow Code wrote:
John Barnard wrote in
news:BoaCg.363209$IK3.254749@pd7tw1no:

Slow Code wrote:
Joe from Kokomo wrote in
:

Slow Code wrote:

You KKKanadians and the democrats are just upset he's killing your
friends.
My, my. How convenient of you to overlook the death or maiming of
the sons and daughters of America.

And, sadly, it's all for naught.

Seeing as you advertise you are slow, I will type the following real
slooow.

As of August 7, 2006, the O-F-F-I-C-I-A-L position of the
administration is: NO WMDs. Don't quote me any web addresses or give
me your -opinion-; the OFFICIAL -government- position is "NO WMDs".

The whole "yellowcake" episode has been proven, time and again, to
be a fraud and a FORGERY.

NONE (as in ZERO) of the 9/11 mad dogs were from Iraq and they STILL
aren't from Iraq.

Saddam did NOT support Bin Laden; Saddam was for a secular
government and Osama was for a ultraconservative religious
government---they were at -opposite- ends of the political spectrum.

This whole "war" is BULL**** and sadly, people on both sides are
dying for nothing.

Joe from Kokomo


Awww-Jeez, Not this **** again.

Sc


Please just shorten the "Slow Code" to "Slow"; it'll be more
reflective of who you are. Can you not reply intelligently to any of
the aforementioned points? Or does that process escape you completely?

JB


No point in arguing. You prefer the taste of Liberal Bull**** more than
the truth, so seeing the facts all over again probably won't make you
change your brain cell.

Sc




The effective translation of your statement is that you don't have a
clue.

JB


The effective translation of my statement is that you won't accept the
truth because your a liberal idiot.

Sc

Heard on BBC
 

On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:03:14 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

David wrote in
:

On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 23:19:16 GMT, Slow Code wrote:


No point in arguing. You prefer the taste of Liberal Bull**** more than
the truth, so seeing the facts all over again probably won't make you
change your brain cell.

Truth and facts are 2 different things.


And the fact you choose to ignore the truth doesn't make the truth false.

Sc
Truth is for chumps.

''Common dictionary definitions of truth mention some form of accord
with fact or reality. There is, however, no single definition of truth
about which scholars agree, and numerous theories of truth continue to
be widely debated. Differing opinions exist on such questions as what
constitutes truth, how to define and identify truth, what roles do
revealed and acquired knowledge play, and whether truth is subjective,
relative, objective, or absolute.''

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth

Heard on BBC
 

On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 18:02:40 +0900, "Brenda Ann"
wrote:

or relative moralism

Heard on BBC
 

www.devilfinder.com The real british monarchy
cuhulin

Heard on BBC
 

John Barnard wrote:

All of what you say is true but Telamon's robe isn't pearly white on the
posting of off-topic items and his "plonk" seems to be remarkably
selective at times. So selective one might say that it is
politically-based ;-).

-VERY- astute observation! and you are not the only one to have noticed.