Low Power Shortwave station Omega One Radio is still going strong on
13.556.00 MHz in the the 22 meter shortwave band, Despite "complaints"
on the newsgroup about the station. The station began in July of this
year with a output of 5 watts and then increase it to 10 watts followed
by 25 watts, then 50 watts and now is running with a power output of
100 watts. The station has been heard mostly out east, yet some people
out in the western part of the United States claim that they too are
also hearing this little station. The station runs 24 hours a day, 7
days a week and will continue to grow and improve itself and be the
best it can be!!

Todd Daugherty N9OGL
OMEGA ONE RADIO
13.556.00 MHz LSB
22 Meter Shortwave Band
website: http://n9ogl.blogspot.com/

Losers Use 22 Meters

On 8 Sep 2006 12:09:34 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Low Power Shortwave station Omega One Radio is still going strong on 13.556.00 MHz in the the 22 meter shortwave band, Despite "complaints" If you were really modern, you'd be doing podcasts over the Internet, would reach the whole world and, best of all, would be legal. Short wave is dying. Most of the big SW stations are going off the air. You should take a page out of Lloyd's book. You should use modern technology like a TRS-80 and an electret microphone.

Lloyd Daugherty wrote:
Losers Use 22 Meters


On 8 Sep 2006 12:09:34 -0700, N9OGL wrote:
Low Power Shortwave station Omega One Radio is still going strong on
13.556.00 MHz in the the 22 meter shortwave band, Despite "complaints"

If you were really modern, you'd be doing podcasts over the Internet,
would reach the whole world and, best of all, would be legal. Short
wave is dying. Most of the big SW stations are going off the air.

I would be on the Internet, but some ****ing ham operators had me
kicked off all the ISP in this town so **** YOU AND **** THEM!!!

You should take a page out of Lloyd's book. You should use modern
technology like a TRS-80 and an electret microphone.

I own a ****ing MAC

Todd N9OGL
OMEGA ONE RADIO
13.556.00 LSB

TRS-80s Rule

On 8 Sep 2006 13:26:04 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Lloyd Daugherty wrote: You should take a page out of Lloyd's book. You should use modern technology like a TRS-80 and an electret microphone. I own a ****ing MAC True, TRS-80s are a little classier than a Mac, but serious technophiles should try to get hold of one. I hear that you can purchase them used, so maybe that would be a viable option for you. Once you have experienced the awesome power of a screaming, 4.77 MHz Z80 processor, you will never go back. TRS-80s rule, Dude.

In article ,
Lloyd Daugherty wrote:

Once you have experienced the awesome power of a screaming, 4.77 MHz
Z80 processor, you will never go back. TRS-80s rule, Dude.

BUZZZZZZZZ! Wrong answer! We were looking for "1.77" Mhz.

The Model 1 was 1.77 Mhz, the Model 2 was 4 Mhz, the Model 3 was 2 Mhz,
the Model 4 was 4 Mhz.

But thanks for playing!

Mike

"N9OGL" wrote in message
oups.com...

I would be on the Internet, but some ****ing ham operators had me
kicked off all the ISP in this town

Good for them.

Mike wrote:
In article ,
Lloyd Daugherty wrote:

Once you have experienced the awesome power of a screaming, 4.77 MHz
Z80 processor, you will never go back. TRS-80s rule, Dude.

BUZZZZZZZZ! Wrong answer! We were looking for "1.77" Mhz.

The Model 1 was 1.77 Mhz, the Model 2 was 4 Mhz, the Model 3 was 2 Mhz,
the Model 4 was 4 Mhz.

But thanks for playing!

Mike



Perhaps the Radio Shack model had the quoted speeds, but others went a
step further...

http://cpu-museum.de/?m=Zilog&f=Z80

I personally preferred the 6502.



mike

N9OGL wrote:

The station has been heard mostly out east, yet some people
out in the western part of the United States claim that they too are
also hearing this little station. The station runs 24 hours a day, 7
days a week and will continue to grow and improve itself and be the
best it can be!!

Hey Toad didn't you say that the stations that can't hear it say the
audio is good?

You lie about everything else so why should we believe anybody is
hearing you?

On Sat, 9 Sep 2006 16:57:17 +0900, Brenda Ann wrote:


wrote in message
oups.com...

If there is no signal how can they hear it? Toad has yet to explain
that one.


It's not at all unusual, especially with SSB signals, to have a signal so
low it doesn't register on an S meter, and yet be perfectly clean and
copiable.

`Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.


----
In message . com,
N9OGL bragged about his radio station with the claim, "the stations
far away say there is no signal but the audio is really good."

wrote:
wrote:

Hey Toad didn't you say that the stations that can't hear it say the
audio is good?

no he did not

You lie about everything else so why should we believe anybody is
hearing you?

you call yourself truth but lie in your first appearance

Here are Toad's own words from rec.radio.amateur.misc, posted 9/2/06:

"Not according to people who had accually heard the station. I have a
number of people locally and as far away as Maryland, New York, and
other locations that heard the station and has email me and written me
and says ti's doing just fine. the stations far away say there is no
signal but the audio is really good."

If there is no signal how can they hear it? Toad has yet to explain
that one.

By the way, Markie, what makes you think this is my first appearance?

Dance, Markie, DANCE!
People are able to hear the audio, regardless if there is a
signal.....nice try.....i've sent out a lot of qsl cards from people
who have comfirmed they heard it by listing all the songs they heard.

Todd