Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() N9NEO wrote: Ok, thanks Misters Black & Miso. I'll grab some 90min tapes and plan on using the pause control. Maybe next expedition I will have a laptop with me. I see how it could be very useful for logging, maps, pointing arrays, downloading porn, communicating with message boards, and a plethora of other as yet unthoughtof tasks. The problem for now is that I have to travel light and a laptop is just too much to have to worry about if vehicle breaks down and I have to thumb it. My only power is 12v cigarette lighter so I do have that limitation. I built a charger for AA batteries from lighter socket so that is all I have. 73 NEO The laptop with a program like www.davee.com 's scanner recorder is more useful for VHF comms that are intermittent than capturing shortwave. A laptop powered from a portable power supply on your 12V auto is QRM city. A laptop in it's internal battery is OK. One of my projects that I never get around to doing is to design a filter to use between the 12V from the car and the portable notebook power supply. Unless you have a late generation notebook, you can't get more than 3 hours of use on the internal batteries. Michael Black wrote: "N9NEO" ) writes: I probably should have asked for this before I bought one. I bought a Sony at circuit city for 24bucks. It seems to work ok but I don't think the quality is so good. I opened her up and poked around. Real cheezy. I'll be leaving this in the desert out in California along with my truck full of camping gear and a couple of loops. I'm flying back and so I'm ditching everything cept the radios and tapes and a few clothes. When I get back I'll probably buy another recorder so I am going to know what I should buy. I had to buy a damn 60db reducer to drive the Sony tape deck from my Degen that has a standard 1v output. Also I wonder if I should use 60min tapes or 120min tapes. UNless this is a portable application, surely the best solution is an actual cassette deck (if you really want to stay with tape). You get line inputs, with volume controls and no AGC. You get level indicators. You can select the type of tape (regular, CRO2, metal), and decide whether to use Dolby or not. The line output makes it easy to hook to your computer when you want to turn the tapes into CDROMs. SOme even do auto-reverse. They all have pause controls, letting you prepare for recording without letting the tape roll. The only disadvantage, other than size, is that they generally don't have a means of remotely controlling the motor, so it's messier to make it start recording at some specified time. And of course, few people are using cassettes anymore (I notice I'm not even seeing "Walkman" type portable cassette players at garage sales much, it's now progressed to the equivalent in CD players for only a few dollars), so they are plentiful at garage sales and rummage sales, and real cheap. I got one a few years ago, a dual deck, for all of one dollar. I brought home another one, it seemed a bit fancier, from a rummage sale when we were putting the boxes away afterwards; nobody had bought the two that were for sale. Since they are cheap, one could open it up and break the wire to the motor, bringing out the leads for remote on/off, just like the portable cassette recorders of years gone by. Most use a low voltage DC motor, just like the portable cassette recorders, so it's the same thing. I"ve bought long prerecorded tapes that have become mangled on some cassette players, so I wouldn't recommend 120 minute tapes. They have to make the tape thin in order to fit it all inside the cassette shell, and that makes it too fragile. I've never had a problem with 90 minute tapes, though. Michael |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|