Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Telamon wrote:
Well for the measurements to be meaningful the test conditions must be known. You must (best) know the tone frequencies and input levels along with the output tone levels and the levels of all the intermodulation products you want to report on. IP2 and IP3 are specifications that are higher the better. If I'm not confusing you with another thread I think you mean a comparison to the ALA1530 you you writ "1530". The ALA1530 has very good specifications and to quote this page: http://www.wellbrook.uk.com/ALA1530.html "The Broadband Loop has been specifically designed to reduce intermodulation products to a minimum. The second order and the third order intercept points are typically +70dBm (IP2) and +40dBm (IP3) respectively. Thus the level of the intermodulation products are generally below the atmospheric and man made noise." These intermodulation numbers are huge and I don't see the point in working to get higher numbers than these. I could say that numbers higher than these are not important unless you sit by some transmitter in the passband of the antenna/amplifier. I am I off base? -- Telamon Ventura, California One reason I want to get the Wellbrook teste, is to verify that it is fact operating correctly. The guy I traded if from says the performance now is like when it was new. His dissatifaction lead, in part, to his moving on from SWL. Of course even if everything had worked perfectly he would have grown bored in a few months to a couple of years. My comments regarding Dalla's "ultra linear amplifier" had to do with its use as a large loop, non fractional wavelength,amplifier, and as a buffer to make up the losses in a 4 way power divider setup. The ancient GE multiset coupler uses Nuvistors and Dallas' amplifier has much better IP2/IP3/THD then that unit. Of course it still has the original tubes and I am running plates at about 5 volts lower then the orignal design. Dallas' amplifier being balanced and having a better handle on negative feedback should be expected to have lower distortion then a Nuvistor triode amplifier. I completed the WL1030 and, at my home, it behaves very similary to the Wellbrook ALA. Slighlty better 3rd harmonic distortion from the local 770KHz MW station a few miles away, but still not as good as the stock North Country active antenna, a Datong AD370 or stock AMRAD antennas as published in QST. I used a Kiwa highpass, BCB reject filter, on the output of all three antennas. Compared to Dallas' active dipole all the others are kind of sad. Receivers used: R2000 R8B R392 Hopefully this evening I will get a chance to run the WL1040 and a just completed "improved" version of Dallas' active dipole to Jeff's condo for a real world, nightmare test. All of the antennas except for the wellbrook can be easily tested as one has access to the amplifiier input. Sadly the Wellbrook is in ?Epoxy making testing and/or repair difficult if not impossible. This thread was meant to define what I consider to be a "good" useage of small loops. That is for mobile or other space restricted spaces where a tuned small loop can give amazing results. I have been underwealmed by broad band, untuned loops. I am not saying they don't work, I just haven't exeperienced a broadband loop that works as good as a simple active antenna, much less a proper active antenna. Using the small loop on 20 and 40 meters and NVIS I have talked/CWed mobile from Knoxville TN to Lexington KY. That is a successfull aplication of a loop antenna. Terry |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
AM/MW Loop Antenna - Inductive Coupling -vice- Resistor Spoiler | Shortwave | |||
Building a 'simple' Attic Loop Antenna = Not So Simple ! | Shortwave | |||
SkyWire Loop Antenna [Was: Wire loop.] Question | Shortwave | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Shortwave |