US Military planning to kill shortwave radio.
 

Talk about the arrogance of these people. Killing thousands of Whales
and Dolphins each year with their sonar just isn't enough....


http://www.physics.otago.ac.nz/space...ase_8Aug06.htm

or:

http://snipurl.com/y75z






mike

US Military planning to kill shortwave radio.
 

"The remediation system aims to protect hundreds of low earth-orbiting
satellites from having their onboard electronics ruined by charged particles
in unusually intense radiation belts "pumped up" by high-altitude nuclear
explosions or powerful solar storms"

As if nukes or powerful solar storms are a good thing for shortwave.
Allah must of had a hangover when he gave these people a brain.

"m II" wrote in message news:j6jVg.12480$N4.5499@clgrps12...
Talk about the arrogance of these people. Killing thousands of Whales
and Dolphins each year with their sonar just isn't enough....


http://www.physics.otago.ac.nz/space...ase_8Aug06.htm

or:

http://snipurl.com/y75z






mike

US Military planning to kill shortwave radio.
 

Seeing-I-dawg wrote:
"The remediation system aims to protect hundreds of low earth-orbiting
satellites from having their onboard electronics ruined by charged particles
in unusually intense radiation belts "pumped up" by high-altitude nuclear
explosions or powerful solar storms"

As if nukes or powerful solar storms are a good thing for shortwave.
Allah must of had a hangover when he gave these people a brain.

It seems to totally exclude the possibility that this particle belt
they wish to diminish on an ad-hoc basis also contributes to protection
of life on earth from the hazards of extraterrestrial radiation, which
are considerable.

Bruce Jensen

US Military planning to kill shortwave radio.
 

"bpnjensen" wrote

It seems to totally exclude the possibility that this particle belt
they wish to diminish on an ad-hoc basis also contributes to protection
of life on earth from the hazards of extraterrestrial radiation, which
are considerable.

'...charged particles in unusually intense radiation belts "pumped up" by
high-altitude nuclear explosions or powerful solar storms'

ad-hoc?

US Military planning to kill shortwave radio.
 

"m II" wrote in message news:j6jVg.12480$N4.5499@clgrps12...
Talk about the arrogance of these people.

Who was talking about what arrogance?

Killing thousands of Whales and Dolphins each year with their sonar just
isn't enough....

I assume you have a personal fin count on this.


http://www.physics.otago.ac.nz/space...ase_8Aug06.htm

or:

http://snipurl.com/y75z






mike

US Military planning to kill shortwave radio.
 

Seeing-I-dawg wrote:
"bpnjensen" wrote

It seems to totally exclude the possibility that this particle belt
they wish to diminish on an ad-hoc basis also contributes to protection
of life on earth from the hazards of extraterrestrial radiation, which
are considerable.

'...charged particles in unusually intense radiation belts "pumped up" by
high-altitude nuclear explosions or powerful solar storms'

ad-hoc?

When it comes to solar storms, yes. These happen frequently enough
(and naturally enough) to be considered to be a constant source of
concern for anyone interested in satellites. You throw antidotes at
this cosmic disease often enough and you may find the cure for one
problem makes the ailment worse. Obviously, if you can protect vital
equipment from a nuclear war, by all means do it. To constantly
disrupt a natural protection from a potential hazard, even to protect
pieces of machinery, should require a bit more thinking through.

Bruce Jensen

US Military planning to kill shortwave radio.
 

Brenda Ann wrote:
--


My question, perhaps a stupid one, but one that begs the asking nonetheless
would be:

If there is so much disruption to satellites from nuclear bombs, is there
going to be anyone around to use them (or care whether they are there or
not)?
acording various projections in the 1980's when I working for my Uncle
Sam in that feild more than 120 million amercians were expected to
survive a nuclear war of the Soveit Union, then depending oin part on
wether comincation (and other services could be kept working that
population may may only slightly or dramitc to 100 million or 20
million (the level subsistance ag could sustatian) so if you can keep
sat and other com links up ayou have the abilty to try to re knit
equipemtn with spare part know where esentcail drugg sould be deployed
and have a chance ( althought it looked pretty grim in those days) aof
sustaining much of the rest of the popualtion of the USA. Today only
the USA (and maybe the PRC have a real arsenal of worakbale nukes and
therefore far more amercians would be killed in any exchange (since I
dod assume if we launch out weapons it will at a non us target) it also
seems unlikely in any exchange today that the US would dump the rack
and matintining control of the nukes we have not launched would be
crtical use for our sats

irnoicaly the end of the cold has made Nuclear war seem More likely to
many folks becuase it would be a smaller war

hope that will do as an answer

US Military planning to kill shortwave radio.
 

http://ed-thelen.org/last-line.html

SL 60 Battery C.I was there from January 1963 till September 1963.Nike
Hercules Nuclear Missiles.That was back in the Cold War era.Actually,the
Cold War never went away,it only simmered down for a while.The Cold War
is back on again.
cuhulin

US Military planning to kill shortwave radio.
 

"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
...


--
Say no to institutionalized interference.
Just say NO to HD/IBOC!
"bpnjensen" wrote in message
oups.com...
Seeing-I-dawg wrote:
"bpnjensen" wrote

It seems to totally exclude the possibility that this particle belt
they wish to diminish on an ad-hoc basis also contributes to
protection
of life on earth from the hazards of extraterrestrial radiation, which
are considerable.

'...charged particles in unusually intense radiation belts "pumped up"
by
high-altitude nuclear explosions or powerful solar storms'

ad-hoc?

When it comes to solar storms, yes. These happen frequently enough
(and naturally enough) to be considered to be a constant source of
concern for anyone interested in satellites. You throw antidotes at
this cosmic disease often enough and you may find the cure for one
problem makes the ailment worse. Obviously, if you can protect vital
equipment from a nuclear war, by all means do it. To constantly
disrupt a natural protection from a potential hazard, even to protect
pieces of machinery, should require a bit more thinking through.



My question, perhaps a stupid one, but one that begs the asking
nonetheless would be:

If there is so much disruption to satellites from nuclear bombs, is there
going to be anyone around to use them (or care whether they are there or
not)?


That is a very pretty point that you've raised. Want the answer ??? It
doesn't matter what the practical reality is. The ones with all the
resources here that are calling the shots are "LORD HIGH". According to
their acquired self delusions, they'll just walk between the radiation
particles while the rest of us plebeians drop dead slowly.

dh

US Military planning to kill shortwave radio.
 

Electronic Satellites in Space.If the Sunspots don't get them,nukes
will.Or something else.China has been blinding some of our Satellites
with lasers.
I guess in a manner of speaking,they are sitting Ducks up there.On the
Andy Griffith tv show this evening,Andy had to aim a little to the right
to knock over those Ducks at the Carnival.
cuhulin

US Military planning to kill shortwave radio.
 

Lenny wrote:


I assume you have a personal fin count on this.

I'm surprised you find it humorous. You must be Navy.



http://www.eurocbc.org/sonar_lfas_im...ag e1253.html

or

http://snipurl.com/ydv5


http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=...Search&m eta=

or

http://snipurl.com/ydv7


There are a few hundred more sites which you won't look at.





mike

Winning EVEN MORE hearts and minds!
 

Lenny wrote:

Who was talking about what arrogance?



I was talking about THIS arrogance.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5415216.stm

I sure wouldn't want these kind of assholes representing MY country in
another, sovereign land. Come to think of it, I wouldn't want the
politicians that sent them there, either. Does that make me an anti
Semite in your eyes? I've noticed you calling people who disagree with
you that particular name...


mike

Winning EVEN MORE hearts and minds!
 

m II wrote:

Lenny wrote:

Who was talking about what arrogance?

I was talking about THIS arrogance.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5415216.stm

I sure wouldn't want these kind of assholes representing MY country in
another, sovereign land. Come to think of it, I wouldn't want the
politicians that sent them there, either. Does that make me an anti
Semite in your eyes? I've noticed you calling people who disagree with
you that particular name...

Whine, whine, whine. That's all you Canucks are capable of these days.

Stuff some poutine in it, and then blow it out your ass, boy.

P.S. Please try to find yourself a radio that is capable of pulling in more than
the rubbish you're obviously getting from CBC.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Winning EVEN MORE hearts and minds!
 

I sort of have a penpal galfriend in Tell Avive,Israel.(as well as quite
a few other penpal galfriends scattered around the World.We email chat
back and forth with each other once in a while) I am not anti-semite.
cuhulin

Winning EVEN MORE hearts and minds!
 

dx(FMLAO)Ace wrote:

m II wrote:

Lenny wrote:

Who was talking about what arrogance?
I was talking about THIS arrogance.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5415216.stm
I sure wouldn't want these kind of assholes representing MY country in
another, sovereign land. Come to think of it, I wouldn't want the
politicians that sent them there, either. Does that make me an anti
Semite in your eyes? I've noticed you calling people who disagree with
you that particular name...

Whine, whine, whine. That's all you Canucks are capable of these days.

Stuff some poutine in it, and then blow it out your ass, boy.

I don't care what you do in Michigan. If spraying food out of your
rectum gives you kicks, fine....just don't expect decent people to
follow your example, pervert.

Why don't you just go and bomb the hell out of another country with
brown skinned people in it? Or are you too busy writing the defence
argument for yet another GOP pervert?

================================================== ====
A Department of Homeland Security deputy press secretary was
arrested this evening on charges that he was using a computer to seduce
a child.

Brian Doyle, 55, was arrested at 7:45 p.m. in his Silver Springs,
Maryland home on 23 charges related to the use of a computer to seduce a
child and transmitting harmful materials to a minor after a joint
investigation by the Polk County Sheriff’s office, Florida State
Attorney Jerry Hill’s office and the Department of Homeland Security.

http://blog.qusan.com/2006/04/another-gop-pervert.html
================================================== ======



mike






Is it Viet Nam yet?

================================================== ===
In another development, US officials said that about 4,000 Iraqi
policemen had been killed performing their duties over the past two
years, with another 8,000 injured.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5415448.stm
================================================== ====

Winning EVEN MORE hearts and minds!
 

m II wrote:

dx(FMLAO)Ace wrote:

m II wrote:

Lenny wrote:

Who was talking about what arrogance?
I was talking about THIS arrogance.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5415216.stm
I sure wouldn't want these kind of assholes representing MY country in
another, sovereign land. Come to think of it, I wouldn't want the
politicians that sent them there, either. Does that make me an anti
Semite in your eyes? I've noticed you calling people who disagree with
you that particular name...

Whine, whine, whine. That's all you Canucks are capable of these days.

Stuff some poutine in it, and then blow it out your ass, boy.

I don't care what you do in Michigan.

That's good. I don't really care what you do in CanaDuh either.

Just keep it in CanaDuh.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

US Military planning to kill shortwave radio.
 

On 6 Oct 2006 14:57:58 -0700, "
wrote:

irnoicaly the end of the cold has made Nuclear war seem More likely to
many folks becuase it would be a smaller war


And the Russians weren't crazy as hell like these Muslim sonsofbitches
are.

US Military planning to kill shortwave radio.
 

And if the Russkies jump over to grab Canada,,, Uh HUH,,, us Americans
are sooooooo dumb,we will protect Canada.
What am I thinking?
cuhulin

US Military planning to kill shortwave radio.
 

X-No-Archive:

In article j6jVg.12480$N4.5499@clgrps12, m II wrote:

Talk about the arrogance of these people. Killing thousands of Whales
and Dolphins each year with their sonar just isn't enough....


http://www.physics.otago.ac.nz/space...ase_8Aug06.htm

or:

http://snipurl.com/y75z






mike


Mike,

The U.S. has unilaterally claimed space, and presumably the entire universe for
its own purposes. Furthermore, the U.S. reserved the "right" to deny any other
country it chooses the right to utiliize space for any reason. Of course, the
U.S. has already done this on planet earth. See:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/space/arti...925757,00.html

and

http://www.ostp.gov/html/US National Space Policy.pdf

_Most_ people here are too dim-witted to see the obvious problem with this. They
see you and I as the problems. Unfortunately, they are the ignorant ones--so
easily manipulated by the U.S. government. Like taking candy from a baby.

MM