Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Al wrote: ----- Original Message ----- From: "N9NEO" I posted a few questions about loop antannas but they didn't get answered over on Yahoo loop antenna group so I will try here. That particular Yahoo group is generally very responsive and knowledgeable. I find that if you ask too many questions at one time, the reponse is lower than if you keep the questions down to 2 or 3. Break down your questions and you will probably get a better response. As I said earlier, they are good. So now the nice null that you have along the axis of the loop is destroyed because the ferrite is aligned there. Is this correct? If you want to use both antennas, place your receiver into the loop in such a way that the two antennas are mutually aiding each other (they should be locked together in this position) and keep them this way. In other words, if you rotate one antenna in one direction, the other one should also rotate in the same direction. 2) Where should the tuning capacitor be located physically relative to the loop? I would suppose the best place to put the capacitor would be directly on the coil. Total distance would probably be less than a foot. So is this a good plan? Yes, keep it close to the coil but don't go crazy trying to keep it extra short. Try your plan plus or minus a foot and you will not hear a difference. 3) I have three wiring options as far as the variable capacitor goes. One gang, two gang in parallel, or two gang in series. Right now I use two in parallel near the bottom end of the band, and one gang nearer the top. Sounds complex. Do you have to tune both capacitors in order to resonate the antenna? Simplify by keeping the capacitor(s) near the easy access point only. If you can tune your antenna across the range you want (which may be difficult with just one variable capacitor) then you have accomplished your goal. 5) I am considering going from 20 Gauge magnet over to litz wire. I suppose in theory there should be an improvement, but nothing that you will be able to hear. It's like comparing a million dollars to a million-and-one dollars. Mathematically the million-and-one is better, but what can you do with that extra dollar that you can't do with a million? 6) I am also considering the varactor diode tuning approach. Comments? I also have a loop antenna, for the LF band below 550kHz, that I would like to tune remotely and have considered varactors. The negative comments I read about varactors is that because they are diodes, there will be some rectification effect on incoming signals resulting in unwanted signals. I have not tried them so I don't know how they will work. If you come up with a workable solution, please let us know. The diodes have a reverse DC bias, so there is no rectification of the RF signal. Now the Q of the varactor might be an issue. Thank-you for any guidance you can give with this project. Regards, NEO No problem. Keep us posted on your findings. Al KA5JGV San Antonio, TX http://home.satx.rr.com/ka5jgv/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Shortwave Listener (SWL) Newbee Question - Is My Dipole Antenna Set-Up Right ? | Shortwave | |||
New LongWire Antenna - What Type Wire? | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |