Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #3   Report Post  
Old October 30th 06, 01:13 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 133
Default Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio?


wrote:
On 29 Oct 2006 13:06:10 -0800,
wrote:


an_old_friend wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
On 29 Oct 2006 12:05:42 -0800,
wrote:


Slow Code wrote:
Opus- wrote in
:

Don't you have some offs to ****?



Why do no-coders always break down in the middle of an argument and start
spewing profanities? I just don't understand it. It must be do to their
limited mental abilities.

Opus being a Cannuk probably doesn't help either.

SC

Removing the code requirement at this late date would do little to
increase the number of hams applying for a license.
but it can help retain those we get and encourage them into intagrate
into the ARs as opposed to being driven out by such as SC


How would retaining the code requirement help to retain those you do
get. I do not understand.
obviously you do not understand since the opisite was said ending code
tsting could help retain the new hams


I see that you real as well as you spell, which is not very good. I
was responding to the following: "but it can help retain those we get
".

I "real"? indeed I see what you are responding to but you clearly
can't read the sentence since neither of the preceeding poster is
tlaking about reatining code testing
and neither he 2 yet futher in the tree were talking and code testing
at all

the only one that thinks the poster are sufggesting code testing will
retain anything is you and where you get is beyond me




said:
"Removing the code requirement at this late date would do little to
increase the number of hams applying for a license. "

To which responded:
"but it can help retain those we get "

And said:
"I see that you real(sp) as well as you spell, which is not very good.
I
was responding to the following: "but it can help retain those we get"

And said:
"the only one that thinks the poster are sufggesting code testing will
retain anything is you and where you get is beyond me"

If will take the time to read the threaded responses
he will understand how the thread unfolded.







http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com


  #5   Report Post  
Old October 29th 06, 11:12 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 46
Default Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio?

You forgot the most important part....
How about helping out the rest of the world in emergencies?

After any disaster, the first comunications out of the effected area comes
from hams. NOHA gets a lot of there hurricane information from hams in the
affected area. Sometimes while the ham op is in the middle of it.

When all else fails...we are there!!!!
Been there, done that
Joe


SNIPPED

Removing the code requirement at this late date would do little to
increase the number of hams applying for a license. At one time,
possibly 30 years ago it would have made sense to replace the code test
with one that emphasizes skills that actually have a use in the real
world. Sadly, I think that there is little that can be done to attract
younger hams into the hobby. There are just too many license-free ways
of communicating with people from around the world.


Amateur Radio is about much more than "communicating with people from

around the
world".

Amateur Radio is about LEARNING !!! LEARNING some physics, learning

about
sunspots, learning about antennas, learning about propagation, learning

about
some electronics, learning about digital communication techniques,

learning
about VHF propagation, learning about microwaves, learning about wide band

tv
systems, learning about narrow band tv systems, learning about ... [you

complete
the phrase].

If you just want to talk around the world, use CB. If you just want to

talk
around town, use FRS. If you want to LEARN about radio become an Amateur

Radio
operator [make a commitment to LEARN].

/s/ DD, W1MCE





  #7   Report Post  
Old October 31st 06, 12:32 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio?

Dave wrote in
:

wrote:

SNIPPED

Amateur Radio is about LEARNING !!! LEARNING some physics, learning
about sunspots, learning about antennas, learning about propagation,
learning about some electronics, learning about digital communication
techniques, learning about VHF propagation, learning about microwaves,
learning about wide band tv systems, learning about narrow band tv
systems, learning about ... [you complete the phrase].


I notice none of the things you list is Morse Code

If you just want to talk around the world, use CB. If you just want to
talk around town, use FRS. If you want to LEARN about radio become an
Amateur Radio operator [make a commitment to LEARN].

/s/ DD, W1MCE


http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/


I can still put 18-20 wpm on paper [with arthritis in fingers] and read
25+ wpm.

What is your skill level?



Mark in the Dark doesn't have a skill level. He butchers the english
pretty good though.

SC
  #8   Report Post  
Old October 30th 06, 05:59 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 133
Default Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio?


Dave wrote:
wrote:

SNIPPED

Removing the code requirement at this late date would do little to
increase the number of hams applying for a license. At one time,
possibly 30 years ago it would have made sense to replace the code test
with one that emphasizes skills that actually have a use in the real
world. Sadly, I think that there is little that can be done to attract
younger hams into the hobby. There are just too many license-free ways
of communicating with people from around the world.


Amateur Radio is about much more than "communicating with people from around the
world".

Amateur Radio is about LEARNING !!! LEARNING some physics, learning about
sunspots, learning about antennas, learning about propagation, learning about
some electronics, learning about digital communication techniques, learning
about VHF propagation, learning about microwaves, learning about wide band tv
systems, learning about narrow band tv systems, learning about ... [you complete
the phrase].

If you just want to talk around the world, use CB. If you just want to talk
around town, use FRS. If you want to LEARN about radio become an Amateur Radio
operator [make a commitment to LEARN].



I agree - learning something about amateur radio is a requirement for
passing the test. The real question is what kinds of knowlege about
amateur radio should be required of prospective hams before giving them
a license. It would seem to me that testing a prospective ham for
knowlege of how radios operate, how to set up a station properly and
how to operate the equipment safely would be a primary concern. Next
the ham should be able to demonstrate an ability to use the equipment
to communicate in an efficient and courteous manner in a mode that is
widely used. Voice is hands down the most frequently used mode of
communication. Additionally, a knowlege of how to communicate via
radio using voice would be a big help when trying to make contact
during an emergency with professional rescue groups. Having the
prospective ham learn morse code would not provide him with a skill
that has any real world use.

  #9   Report Post  
Old October 29th 06, 10:53 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 444
Default Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of hamradio?

wrote:

SNIPPED

http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/


Mark, this is one of many references to your blogspot. What are you trying to say?

  #10   Report Post  
Old October 30th 06, 12:50 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 444
Default Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of hamradio?

wrote:

On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 17:53:09 -0500, Dave wrote:


wrote:

SNIPPED

http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/


Mark, this is one of many references to your blogspot. What are you trying to say?


what ever I like
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/


FLIP answer. Tnx for nothing.



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
shortwv John Lauritsen Shortwave 0 November 28th 04 07:19 PM
178 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US Albert P. Belle Isle Shortwave 1 November 22nd 04 03:49 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Shortwave 0 June 25th 04 07:32 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews General 0 June 25th 04 07:29 PM
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (09-APR-04) Albert P. Belle Isle Shortwave 1 April 10th 04 06:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017