It was a mistake for the ITU to eliminate the CW requirement.
 

"Chris" wrote in
:

On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 00:30:14 GMT, Opus- wrote:
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:51:34 +0000 (UTC), "Chris"
spake thusly:

It's all about proving that you value a ham license so much that
you'll do some hard work to get it, much like a recruit going through
boot camp.

Code has nothing to do with "value". A recruit going thru boot camp is
a laughable analogy.

We're talking about U.S. regulations. It's kind of odd that a
Canadian would worry that much about them.


The Canadian's screwed up their country, now they're looking around for
another one to screw up.

SC