Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 30th 06, 12:55 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default It was a mistake for the ITU to eliminate the CW requirement.

"Chris" wrote in
:

On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 00:30:14 GMT, Opus- wrote:
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:51:34 +0000 (UTC), "Chris"
spake thusly:

It's all about proving that you value a ham license so much that
you'll do some hard work to get it, much like a recruit going through
boot camp.


Code has nothing to do with "value". A recruit going thru boot camp is
a laughable analogy.


We're talking about U.S. regulations. It's kind of odd that a
Canadian would worry that much about them.



The Canadian's screwed up their country, now they're looking around for
another one to screw up.

SC
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
It was a mistake for the ITU to eliminate the CW requirement. Slow Code Policy 59 October 30th 06 12:55 AM
It was a mistake for the ITU to eliminate the CW requirement. Slow Code Swap 36 October 30th 06 12:55 AM
It was a mistake for the ITU to eliminate the CW requirement. Slow Code Scanner 28 October 28th 06 11:07 PM
It was a mistake for the ITU to eliminate the CW requirement. Slow Code General 0 October 22nd 06 12:33 AM
It was a mistake for the ITU to eliminate the CW requirement. Slow Code General 0 October 21st 06 12:44 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017