Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
m II wrote:
As for those car stereo lunatics, I think they will all be deaf after a few years. I can hear their bloody bass five cars away. How can the use of headphones by a car driver be illegal when that megawatt idiocy is allowed to continue? mike Well, since you've asked... Many communities have passed ordinances, mostly for noise control, making the use of such car stereo's illegal. The criteria are centered on the distance from the vehicle that the sound is still audible. In Aurora, if a car stereo is audible 50 feet from the vehicle (which would be a little less than 5 cars away), the driver can be cited, and the vehicle impounded. Similar ordinances have been passed in a number of communities in and around Chicago. But that's only the tip of the Fletcher-Munson curve. There has been legislative debate downstate, as well as in communities around the state, about the long term safety concerns, not unlike concerns surrounding headphones, of such high pressure sound levels in cars while driving. Competition grade stereos have resulted in permanent hearing loss from the extreme overpressure produced by huge subwoofers firing into the cab. With the windows closed, the overpressure produced by tight bass notes or kick drums can (and frequently have) rupture ear drums. Where such debate stalls, is that the safety aspects of driving with music playing are centered on the ability to hear emergency vehicles, horns, tire screeches, and oncoming traffic...all sounds with huge midrange components. Such sounds are still audible though high bass content. One "expert" explaining to legislators actually made the argument that a factory radio at high levels is more isolating to ambient sounds than a customized vehicle's twin aftermarket subwoofers. Not unlike (mandatory radio content, here....) trying to hear the Liberty Net through the noise on Saturday nights. If the stereo is on in the other room, and the bass is thumping, you have less trouble hearing your RX-320's output, than you do if the atmospheric noise is high. Why? Because the atmospherics and the LibNet voices are competing for the same spectra, where the ear is most sensitive...the bass is not. Take out the upper end on the atmospheric noise, and intelligibility of voices is increased. Subwoofers in cars are not competing for intelligibility with sirens, horns and the guy in the car behind you accompanying his gesticulations with spontaneously assembled language. And there is another phenomenon at play. The truth is, that inside the car, those subwoofers simply don't seem as loud to the driver, as they do to YOU, sitting outside the car. Bear in mind that the guy in the car 5 vehicles away with his windows open has actually created a kind of two stage bandpass box for his subs...the enclosure in which they're mounted is one, but the vehicle cab space into which they fire, is actually another. And with a window open, when that over pressure spews out, it does so through a crude bass port and becomes a wave front. By the time it reaches you 5 cars away, that wave front is defined, and has subtle directional components. Inside the cab, however, it's merely overpressure that's uniformly impinging on the ears of the driver without directional components. These directional components, though very subtle, and often consciously indistinct are at the very heart of how the mind processes audio for the auditory sense. Humans here in stereo. The mind processes in stereo. Without stereo field information, even highly defined audio becomes indistinct, and can be lost in ambience. This is how you can carry on a conversation in a crowded room. The mind allows focus on a single voice among hundreds through recognition parameters...timbre, tone, resonance as well as patterns of rhythm, and anomaly...and spatial orientation. Using the stereo soundfield, the mind processes the subtle phase differences from a single source, and locates it in space. So, in a crowded room of hundreds of voices, one can identify and follow a single voice by it's sound AND location. Put your finger in one ear, take away that stereo spatiality reference, and see how difficult it can become. This phenomenon, btw, is what's behind the use of stereo detectors in communication receivers. Military and commercial receivers have been doing this for some time, because it makes it much easier for code receivers to copy on crowded bands. Similar success has been realized in SSB and AM modes. Back to the issue, though...in the car, without the spatial references, the mind finds the overpressures of bass to be less objectionable, even less audible, than you do outside the car, with a defined, and spatially locatable wavefront. Literally, it's more irritating for you, because it's more difficult for the mind to ignore. And armed with expert testimony in this, the industry has stalled legislation that would ban high powered stereos in cars, as was done with headphones. If you ever have the opportunity to drive a vehicle equipped with a high watt stereo and big subs, you'll be surprised, at the end of the drive, at how comfortable you are with the level, and how loud it is for the rest of us outside the car. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
MY NEW DX-160 REVIEW - By Judah Smith | Shortwave | |||
Tecsun PL-230 (Grundig YB-550) Review (NEW RADIO) | Shortwave | |||
Pilot Travel Centers Fined $125,000! | CB | |||
Review: Amateur Radio Companion 3rd Edition | Equipment | |||
Review: Amateur Radio Companion 3rd Edition | Equipment |