RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   RCI Reception in Seattle, is it possible? My understanding is that the HR antennas that target North America cannot target Puget Sound... (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/110912-rci-reception-seattle-possible-my-understanding-hr-antennas-target-north-america-cannot-target-puget-sound.html)

Will December 8th 06 05:10 PM

RCI Reception in Seattle, is it possible? My understanding is that the HR antennas that target North America cannot target Puget Sound...
 
I'm surprised that no one has mentioned that RCI just a week or so ago
revamped its entire program and transmission lineup, and dropped all
the CBC-originated programs, and that the new ones are so limited in
scope and essentially uninteresting that there is just about no reason
to
listen to RCI any longer!

The thrust of all the RCI programming is now oriented toward new and
prospective immigrants, explaining the details of life in Canada to
them. Can be interesting at times, but not as a steady diet, and gets
repetitive already, even after this short a time. The Maple Leaf Mail
Bag
program on Sundays is supposed to continue, but last week's edition
was a repeat of the previous, pre-changeover one.

Their current lineup drastically reduced English, and they now have a
series of other-language programs with some English hours interspersed,
in a totally incomprehensible arrangement, in the service directed
toward the US and North America. How many Chinese-speaking
people interested in emigrating to Canada would be listening to 9610
kHz
at 1405 UT (8 AM Central) in the US? I'll guess twelve... :-) Yet they
devote an hour to that language daily then. (9610 replaced the previous
3 frequencies -- 13655, 9515, & 17810 [might be off a bit on that last
one] --
even though they worked OK.

They waited to do this AFTER they had printed and mailed out the new
season's program/frequency schedules, all of which are now wrong and
useless. What a waste!

If you can receive the CBC Northern Service on 9625 kHz, as mentioned
before in this thread, it provides the main worthwhile shortwave signal
from Canada now. But reception of that is really problematical.

Will


Dan Say December 10th 06 03:01 AM

RCI Reception in Seattle, is it possible? My understanding is that the HR antennas that target North America cannot target Puget Sound...
 
bpnjensen wrote:

Dan Say wrote:

CHU not newsy? The news changes every minute.


LOL!

And it only the upper frequency that is in danger.


Oh - my mistake - I thought I recalled that all three may be in
jeopardy.

Bruce Jensen


Linkname: ARRLWeb: Canada's 7.335 MHz CHU Time Signal
Could Go Silent, Shift
URL: http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2006/11/30/100/

Linkname: NRC Short Wave Station Broadcasts (CHU) | NRC-INMS
http://inms-ienm.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/time...rtwave_broadca
sts_e.html
quote
...."In April 2007 the licence on 7.335 MHz will have to be
modified to
reflect changes on the status of the band allocation by the
International Telecommunications Union. This frequency has been
changed from "fixed service" to "broadcast". (The ITU decision
does not affect the frequencies 3.33 MHz and 14.67 MHz.) Some
alternatives a... "
[ more ]
--
-\_,-~-\___...__._._._._._._._._._._._.
For real Dxing,
see]http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~vz6g-iwt/index.html



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com