"John Smith" wrote in message
...
wrote:
...
understand this? And radio operates exactly the same way; you send
signals here,they receive them there.The only difference is there is no
cat''
cuhulin

Well, although in 1925 Einstein denied existence of the ether, in 1929 he
reneged and accepted the existence of the ether. Without the ether no
electromagnetic wave could traverse what we know as space.

Cretin.

For those reading who have a greater than
room temperature IQ:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminiferous_aether

Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote:
...
For those reading who have a greater than
room temperature IQ:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminiferous_aether



Buddy, if you are claiming radio waves transverse the universe without a
medium, your IQ is zero.

Wikipedia is wrong. Probably why some say not to believe everything you
read on the internet.

Of course, your radio probably receives protons rather than waves, you
must be a true genius to have figured out how to do that!

ROFLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Regards,
JS

Somewhere on the internet there is a website about what some scientist
say the Universe sounds like.I have heard it before,it is sort of like a
low hum sound/noise.
cuhulin

On Dec 17, 9:24 pm, wrote:

- Somewhere on the internet there is a website about
- what some scientist say the Universe sounds like.

- I have heard it before,it is sort of like a low hum sound/noise.
- cuhulin

So the Universe 'sounds' like my Head !

Hey the the Universe is really this Really Really Big
Empty Space {Nothingness} that has a whole lot of
really really small things {Stuff} moving around in it.

So the Universe 'is' like my Head ! ~ RHF

I don't think John Smith read the entire section on Ether...you need to
update your Physics book to the late 20th Century. Ether is considered
a non-issue in modern physics theories.



"Today, the majority of physicists hold that there is no need to
imagine that a medium for light propagation exists. They believe that
neither Einstein's general theory of relativity nor quantum mechanics
have need for it and that there is no evidence for it. As such, a
classical aether is an unnecessary addition to physics that violates
the principle of Occam's razor.

Moreover, it is hard to develop an aether theory that is consistent
with all experiments of modern physics. Any new theory of aether must
be consistent with all of the experiments testing phenomena of special
relativity, general relativity, relativistic quantum mechanics, and so
on. As outlined earlier, these conditions are often contradictory,
making such a task inherently difficult.

Nevertheless the intuitive appeal of a causal background for
"relativistic" effects cannot be denied. Some physicists hold that
there remain a number of problems in modern physics that are simplified
by an aether concept, so that Occam's razor doesn't apply."


Bruce..Radiation Physicist

BruceMN44 wrote:

I don't think John Smith read the entire section on Ether...you need to
update your Physics book to the late 20th Century. Ether is considered
a non-issue in modern physics theories.
...

I know of no physicist who would claim radio waves traverse the universe
(space) with no media to distribute their energy.

Like I say, prepare a paper, I am sure the scientific community is ready
to hear how radio waves are but a myth ...

JS

www.devilfinder.com Foucault Pendulum

Shows the motion of the Earth.
cuhulin

John Smith wrote:
BruceMN44 wrote:

I don't think John Smith read the entire section on Ether...you need to
update your Physics book to the late 20th Century. Ether is considered
a non-issue in modern physics theories.
...

I know of no physicist who would claim radio waves traverse the universe
(space) with no media to distribute their energy.

Like I say, prepare a paper, I am sure the scientific community is ready
to hear how radio waves are but a myth ...

JS

John Smith,
You seem to be consumed by this ether subject yet you give no current
references, only historical data from the early 1920's. You seem to
enjoy the attention this thread has generated, yet offer nothing even
remotely update on this subject. Fact of the mater you have taken
ether beyond theoretical physics and have tried to apply it to applied
physics...Antenna radiating waves through an ether!!!! I feel you are
have made a leap that hasn't been proven scienticically by experiment
yet! Only theory in some circles...which rise and fall with eb
scientific conjecture. Bruce

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
BruceMN44 wrote:

I don't think John Smith read the entire section on Ether...you need to
update your Physics book to the late 20th Century. Ether is considered
a non-issue in modern physics theories.
...

I know of no physicist who would claim radio waves traverse the universe
(space) with no media to distribute their energy.

Then you know of no Physicist. Period.

Like I say, prepare a paper, I am sure the scientific community is ready
to hear how radio waves are but a myth ...

The papers have already been prepared, peer reviewed and accepted. About
60 years ago.

Mike

They ALL claim exaclty that!

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html
"John Smith" wrote in message
...
BruceMN44 wrote:

I don't think John Smith read the entire section on Ether...you need to
update your Physics book to the late 20th Century. Ether is considered
a non-issue in modern physics theories.
...

I know of no physicist who would claim radio waves traverse the universe
(space) with no media to distribute their energy.

Like I say, prepare a paper, I am sure the scientific community is ready
to hear how radio waves are but a myth ...

JS