Mike wrote:
...

Mike:

I get a lot of things, you believe in particles emitting from our
antennas, as opposed to waves--great, my antenna is a proton emitting
device, yeah. LOL!

Damn, I wish all the books would quit referring to "Radio Waves" and
start talking about proton emitting xmitters! Damn dummies! LOL!

Regards,
JS

Photons...not protons. Self educated huh?

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Mike wrote:
...

Mike:

I get a lot of things, you believe in particles emitting from our
antennas, as opposed to waves--great, my antenna is a proton emitting
device, yeah. LOL!

Damn, I wish all the books would quit referring to "Radio Waves" and start
talking about proton emitting xmitters! Damn dummies! LOL!

Regards,
JS

Brian Denley wrote:
Photons...not protons. Self educated huh?


The modern concept of the photon was developed gradually (1905–17) by
Albert Einstein[2][3][4][5] to explain experimental observations that
did not fit the classical wave model of light. In particular, the photon
model accounted for the frequency dependence of light's

that is taken from he
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon

And, while that is indeed a neat "concept" and depends on einsteins
"gravitational ether", it is not the protons which are real and NOT a
concept ...

Protons are real ...

JS