Brian Denley wrote:
You obviously haven't. Radio waves (same as light) have a dual nature and
act as particles and waves. This can be demonstrated.


As I pointed out in "Newtons Balls of Force", the energy imparted to the
device behaves as a "wave" ... light does indeed have properties both of
a wave and particles ...

Radio frequencies only have properties of a wave ...

JS

No there is no difference; they are both electromagnetic radiation but with
differing wavelengths. They both move at the speed of light and they obey
the same principles (Maxwell's equations). Radio waves are also 'photons'
and have both wave and particle behavior.

BTW, as someone else posted Michaelson and Morley (in one of the most
amazing leaps of knowlege ever taken by man) dispelled the ether myth at the
end of the 19th century when they measued the speed of light exactly the
same whether the observer was moving towar the source or away from it. This
measurements would have been different if there was an 'ether' for the
'waves to move through'.

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html


"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Brian Denley wrote:
You obviously haven't. Radio waves (same as light) have a dual nature
and act as particles and waves. This can be demonstrated.


As I pointed out in "Newtons Balls of Force", the energy imparted to the
device behaves as a "wave" ... light does indeed have properties both of a
wave and particles ...

Radio frequencies only have properties of a wave ...

JS

When Astronauts return to Earth from orbiting around Earth,their
wris****ches are a fraction of a second off.I forget if it is a fraction
of a second faster or slower.
cuhulin