Mike wrote:
...
Well, you would have no space for it, either! Without space, you
could NOT make the Universe--you simply would not have the space!

...
Mike


You, yourself, claim there is NO ether, that space is truly nothing ...

Yet, now you say there would be no space for such in NOTHING? scratch
head here

The ether appears to permeate everything and every form of matter. It
appears there is so much "room" between our atomic and sub-atomic
particles that ether flows through it as wind does a screen. Matter fit
quite nicely, simply displacing a portion of the ether (perhaps a minor
compression?)

But, this is only a "theory", much like the "generally accepted theory."
While in high school physics we learn "truths", in the real physics
world we realize we lack many answers ...

A few universities still research, construct and do experiments in
regards to the ether ... some admit we still cannot prove that the ether
is non-existent, and if found to exist, realize we will once again
rewrite what we know, a task already done many times.

JS

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Mike wrote:
...
Well, you would have no space for it, either! Without space, you could
NOT make the Universe--you simply would not have the space!

... Mike


You, yourself, claim there is NO ether, that space is truly nothing ...

I never said that "space is truly nothing". There are lots of things in
space, things that we can detect. I just don't believe in things that we
can't detect - like "ether". If "ether" is ever detected and proven, then
I will acccept it. To accept something which can not be detected sounds
like religion to me.

Yet, now you say there would be no space for such in NOTHING? scratch
head here

If you truly had nothing, then there would be no space. But if you have
space, you have something. And if you have space, you also have time.

Mike