| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
seems to me, they would make more money by lowering it to at least $40 or
so. People might actually be tempted to pay it. -- William Baldwin, Jr MBA HCM program at the Univ of Phoenix Ground below Zero at New Orleans area La. go to: www.coastguardauxiliaryslidell8cr.us "John" wrote in message ... "NEWNEWS" wrote in t: Licenses are now $80 (and going up next year?). It's no wonder the retailers would rather a prospective consumer not know they will need a license. I keep hearing Wally-Wonder-Radio ($8/hour 'salespeople') in Best-Buy and Wal*Mart tell folks that: "Oh, you no longer need the license. The airwaves are now free." A GMRS license now costs $85. It went up a few months ago. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"WILLIAM BALDWIN JR" wrote in
news
seems to me, they would make more money by lowering it to at least $40 or so. People might actually be tempted to pay it. Instead they raise it about $5 a year. I really wonder if they actually expect folks to pay. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 8, 11:05 am, John wrote:
"WILLIAM BALDWIN JR" wrote innews
seems to me, they would make more money by lowering it to at least $40 or so. People might actually be tempted to pay it. Instead they raise it about $5 a year. I really wonder if they actually expect folks to pay. I know lots of people with walkie-talkies, and don't know of a single one ever mentioning that they have a license. Don't see the point in bothering. It's just a way for the FCC to collect money on something they can't feasibly regulate anyway. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Invader3K" wrote in
ups.com: I know lots of people with walkie-talkies, and don't know of a single one ever mentioning that they have a license. Don't see the point in bothering. It's just a way for the FCC to collect money on something they can't feasibly regulate anyway. Nonetheless, a license is a requirement. A great many people do get a license. It's the right thing to do and it is a requirement. You have no choice. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 9, 9:56 am, John wrote:
Nonetheless, a license is a requirement. A great many people do get a license. Yeah, 5% of a million is still a lot of people, I guess. It's the right thing to do Are you making this up as you go along? Prove it. Legality neither proves nor disproves what is "right." You have no choice. Of course, I do. Bruce Jensen |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"bpnjensen" wrote in message oups.com... On Apr 9, 9:56 am, John wrote: Nonetheless, a license is a requirement. A great many people do get a license. Yeah, 5% of a million is still a lot of people, I guess. It's the right thing to do Are you making this up as you go along? Prove it. Legality neither proves nor disproves what is "right." There are standars of right and wrong. The point is its illegal to operate a gmrs radio without a license. You have no choice. Of course, I do. Bruce Jensen Yes, you do, you can break the law by operating a gmrs radio without a license, or comply with the law and get a license to operate. Just because you don't pay for illegality now, doesn't mean you wont later. If you feel safe, you're welcome to it. But people that generally don't have regard enough for the law will turn gmrs into another cb radio band. I for one don't want to see that and will report people using the radios without a license. B |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| 203 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (27-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
| shortwv | Shortwave | |||
| 197 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (23-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
| 214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (09-APR-04) | Shortwave | |||
| 209 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (04-APR-04) | Shortwave | |||