Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What Albert Einstein said about Radio.
OK! i have read this whole thread, so who won? i am not trying to stir
it up again. i want to know what is the latest and/or best theory! (i do think that theory is the term because i have not seen proof either way) who is in charge of the last word? i previously understood that radio was a magnetic force, a subatomic energy similar to gravity. and like gravity, its not yet completely understood. (we dont need to understand it to detect, measure or use it) magnetic energy has a spectrum from gravity through radio into light and who knows how far beyond. the particular qualities of this energy depends upon its frequency or position relative to the spectrum. now one guy is arguing on the existence of either, or a medium to propagate the waves. this seems true at one end of the spectrum. the other guy argues on photons or little energy packets that transverse distance like particles do. this also seems true at the OTHER end of the spectrum. where are we on the spectrum NOW? e l f radio is radio but it works very much like a magnetic force. e h f is also radio. radio at gigahz frequencies and above is starting to exhibit properties of light. so where the hell are we talking about on the e m spectrum and how the hell does my antenna work? SOMEBODY here HAS to be the one with the highest education! what are YOUR qualifications and then what is YOUR opinion? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
What Albert Einstein said about Radio.
"Jim" wrote in message ... OK! i have read this whole thread, so who won? Among physicists 'no ether' won. 'ether' is an over extended analogy of acoustic waves. The role of a medium in acoustic waves is easily and relatively directly perceivable. That gets added to one's "common sense" and then the analogy is made to EM waves. But if one goes beyond just making the analogy and actually tries to measure this 'ether' it disappears, is contradictory, and/or is superfluous. i am not trying to stir it up again. But it may serve to do so. i want to know what is the latest and/or best theory! (i do The wiki page is pretty good. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminiferous_aether "today the aether is considered to be a superseded scientific theory" "... the mechanical qualities of the aether had become more and more magical: it had to be a fluid in order to fill space, but one that was millions of times more rigid than steel in order to support the high frequencies of light waves. It also had to be massless and without viscosity, otherwise it would visibly affect the orbits of planets. Additionally it appeared it had to be completely transparent, non-dispersive, incompressible, and continuous at a very small scale." "By the early 20th Century, aether theory was in trouble: A series of increasingly complex experiments had been carried out in the late 1800s to try to detect the motion of earth through the aether, and had failed to do so. A range of proposed aether-dragging theories could explain the null result but these were more complex, and tended to use arbitrary-looking coefficients and physical assumptions. Lorentz and Fitzgerald offered a more elegant solution to how the motion of an absolute aether could be undetectable (length contraction), but if their equations were correct, the new special theory of relativity (1905) could generate the same mathematics without referring to an aether at all. Aether fell to Occam's Razor." "Today, the majority of physicists hold that there is no need to imagine that a medium for light propagation exists. They believe that neither Einstein's general theory of relativity nor quantum mechanics have need for it and that there is no evidence for it. As such, a classical aether is an unnecessary addition to physics that violates the principle of Occam's razor." think that theory is the term because i have not seen proof either way) who is in charge of the last word? i previously understood that radio was a magnetic electromagnetic force, a subatomic energy similar to gravity. and like gravity, its not yet completely understood. (we dont need to understand it to detect, measure or use it) magnetic energy has a spectrum from gravity Gravity is something else. Physicists have been trying to link gravity to the other forces of nature (electro-weak and strong nuclear) but have not succeeded. through radio into light and who knows how far beyond. the particular qualities of this energy depends upon its frequency or position relative to the spectrum. now one guy is arguing on the existence of either, or a medium to propagate the waves. this seems true at one end of the spectrum. the other guy argues on photons or little energy packets that transverse distance like particles do. Photons are photons regardless of which end of the spectrum one is talking about. At the low end they have very low energy and one needs of lots of them in order to detect them. They are also 'longer'. this also seems true at the OTHER end of the spectrum. where are we on the spectrum NOW? e l f radio is radio but it works very much like a magnetic force. e h f is also radio. radio at gigahz frequencies and above is starting to exhibit properties of light. so where the hell are we talking about on the e m spectrum and how the hell does my antenna work? SOMEBODY here HAS to be the one with the highest education! what are YOUR qualifications and then what is YOUR opinion? -- rb |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What Albert Einstein said about Radio.
It is simply this,,, y'alls so called ''Time'' can NOT Exist.
cuhulin |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
What Albert Einstein said about Radio.
OK,go look at your cute clocks and your cute wris****ches and on tv and
everywhere else y'all see ''Time'',,,, keep on believing in y'allselfs.''Time'' does not exist,NO such thing. www.devilfinder.com SCTISHLDY (Crank up the bolume) cuhulin |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
What Albert Einstein said about Radio.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
What Albert Einstein said about Radio.
wrote in message
... OK,go look at your cute clocks and your cute wris****ches and on tv and everywhere else y'all see ''Time'',,,, keep on believing in y'allselfs.''Time'' does not exist,NO such thing. Of course it exists. It is the 4th dimension. Example: when you make plans to meet someone - say for lunch - how many coordinates do you give? You say "meet me at Harry's diner at main and 3rd, at 1:00 o'clock". You give 4 coordinates - 3 physical and one of time. Length, width, height, duration. There are (at least) 4 dimensions. Saying WHERE something exists is meaningless without saying WHEN it exists. Did Harry's diner exist at 3rd and Main 1 year ago? A million years ago? Clocks are just the measuring stick. Just as physical dimensions exist independently of feet, meters, and light-years, time exists independently of what we use to measure it. Clocks, inches, sundials, kilometers, decaying atoms, light-years, quartz vibrations, the movement of Earth around the Sun etc. are all just convenient measuring tools. They all give reference points, so we can say things like "The restaurant is a mile north of here" or "I'll be at the restaurant in an hour". The "mile" has no real existence, it's just an agreed upon definition of a length of distance. Similarly, the "hour" has no real existence, it's just an agreed upon definition of a length of time. All of the measuring tools and terms we use to define the 4 dimensions are purely arbitrary. What they are measuring, however, is very real. The concepts of before, now and after are as real and universal as up, down, left, right, forward and backward. Mike |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
What Albert Einstein said about Radio.
Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote:
... All seems to almost make sense, until you consider the fact that under relativity the photon must be WITHOUT mass (weightless at rest) ... right, then it all becomes just as senseless as believing in the ether! JS |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
What Albert Einstein said about Radio.
I bought this news group at Lucky Moran's used car lot a few years
ago.And I found my ex galfriends red dress in the back seat of a 1957 Ford car at Lucky Moran's. (Only jokin) cuhulin |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
What Albert Einstein said about Radio.
Telamon wrote:
... So now you claim dc motors, ac motors, generators, alternators all depend on shooting photons at the "other winding" to induce power there? And, it is these photons which actually created the magnetic lines of force which drive them ... And, my magnet is shooting photons from one end to another, interesting ... JS |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
What Albert Einstein said about Radio.
And my little doggy,she has a sixth dimesion/sense too.She hears sounds
outside that are impossible for me to hear and she hits the front door,barkin her arse off,running back and forth and jumpin on me.There is NO such ''dimesion'' as ''Time'' Doggy,she doesn't know anything about ''Time''.Dogs are much,much smarter than us humans can ever pretend to be.She sure does know when she wants (''Time'') to hump my right leg though. cuhulin |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
197 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (23-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (09-APR-04) | Shortwave | |||
209 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (04-APR-04) | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | Policy | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (01-NOV-03) | Shortwave |