Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 30th 06, 02:55 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,243
Default BBC Reception in Los Angeles



"ve3..." wrote:

Telamon wrote:


Why listen to low bit rate audio on the Internet anyway.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California

""""""""""""'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
Why? Let me count the ways:
1. The bbc streams at about 20k and sounds very good
2. It is free from fading, static, interference, and hiss.
3. The bbc web site offers a wide variety of programs.
4. It is free.
5. It is available 24/7


But it sure as hell ain't shortwave!

You may run along now.

dxAce
Michigan
USA


  #2   Report Post  
Old December 30th 06, 03:06 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 260
Default BBC Reception in Los Angeles


dxAce wrote:
"ve3..." wrote:

Telamon wrote:


Why listen to low bit rate audio on the Internet anyway.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California

""""""""""""'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
Why? Let me count the ways:
1. The bbc streams at about 20k and sounds very good
2. It is free from fading, static, interference, and hiss.
3. The bbc web site offers a wide variety of programs.
4. It is free.
5. It is available 24/7


But it sure as hell ain't shortwave!

You may run along now.

dxAce
Michigan

_________________________________________________

Are you saying that shortwave radio is an obsolete method of program
delivery?
Get an internet radio, boy.

  #3   Report Post  
Old December 30th 06, 03:12 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 133
Default BBC Reception in Los Angeles

"ve3..." wrote in message
oups.com...
Are you saying that shortwave radio is an obsolete method of program
delivery?


Of course it is. But most people in this group will never admit that.

Get an internet radio, boy.


Got several - my computers!

Mike


  #4   Report Post  
Old December 30th 06, 03:25 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,243
Default BBC Reception in Los Angeles



Mike wrote:

"ve3..." wrote in message
oups.com...
Are you saying that shortwave radio is an obsolete method of program
delivery?


Of course it is. But most people in this group will never admit that.


Even if it was, this is not rec.internet.listening!

Please, try to pay attention.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

  #5   Report Post  
Old December 30th 06, 03:14 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,243
Default BBC Reception in Los Angeles



"ve3..." wrote:

dxAce wrote:
"ve3..." wrote:

Telamon wrote:


Why listen to low bit rate audio on the Internet anyway.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
""""""""""""'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
Why? Let me count the ways:
1. The bbc streams at about 20k and sounds very good
2. It is free from fading, static, interference, and hiss.
3. The bbc web site offers a wide variety of programs.
4. It is free.
5. It is available 24/7


But it sure as hell ain't shortwave!

You may run along now.

dxAce
Michigan

_________________________________________________

Are you saying that shortwave radio is an obsolete method of program
delivery?
Get an internet radio, boy.


Stuff that internet radio up your dumb Canucky ass, boy!

dxAce
Michigan
USA




  #6   Report Post  
Old December 30th 06, 03:06 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 133
Default BBC Reception in Los Angeles

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


"ve3..." wrote:

Telamon wrote:


Why listen to low bit rate audio on the Internet anyway.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California

""""""""""""'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
Why? Let me count the ways:
1. The bbc streams at about 20k and sounds very good
2. It is free from fading, static, interference, and hiss.
3. The bbc web site offers a wide variety of programs.
4. It is free.
5. It is available 24/7


But it sure as hell ain't shortwave!


No, it's better than shortwave!

Look, I'm a long time shortwave listener. Been listening since the 60s,
when America was referred too as "running dog capitalists" by Radio Moscow -
and Radio Moscow didn't have commercials! I have dozens of radios here.
Grundigs, Tecsuns, Drake, Scott and Zenith antique tube radios, Panasonics,
Hallicrafters, Sears, etc.

The OP was interested in BBC. I took this to mean he was *only* interested
in BBC. If that is indeed the case, he does not need a $500 radio. His
computer will work fine.

BTW, BBC is not a "low bitrate" stream. 20K for voice is plenty. It
sounds better than *any* shortwave radio, and is available 24/7, static,
hiss and drift free.

Just another option for the OP to consider.

Mike


  #7   Report Post  
Old December 30th 06, 03:12 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,243
Default BBC Reception in Los Angeles



Mike wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


"ve3..." wrote:

Telamon wrote:


Why listen to low bit rate audio on the Internet anyway.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
""""""""""""'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
Why? Let me count the ways:
1. The bbc streams at about 20k and sounds very good
2. It is free from fading, static, interference, and hiss.
3. The bbc web site offers a wide variety of programs.
4. It is free.
5. It is available 24/7


But it sure as hell ain't shortwave!


No, it's better than shortwave!


Pay attention! It's not shortwave.

Look, I'm a long time shortwave listener.


So am I, and I know full well that listening via the internet is not shortwave

Been listening since the 60s,
when America was referred too as "running dog capitalists" by Radio Moscow -
and Radio Moscow didn't have commercials!


Those were the days!

I have dozens of radios here.
Grundigs, Tecsuns, Drake, Scott and Zenith antique tube radios, Panasonics,
Hallicrafters, Sears, etc.


That's nice.

The OP was interested in BBC.


Yes, and by golly he actually mentioned using a shortwave radio in his original post.

I took this to mean he was *only* interested
in BBC. If that is indeed the case, he does not need a $500 radio. His
computer will work fine.


Read the above...

BTW, BBC is not a "low bitrate" stream. 20K for voice is plenty. It
sounds better than *any* shortwave radio, and is available 24/7, static,
hiss and drift free.


Yes, and once again, it's not shortwave.

Sheesh!

dxAce
Michigan
USA


  #8   Report Post  
Old December 30th 06, 04:01 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 133
Default BBC Reception in Los Angeles

"dxAce" wrote in message
...
Yes, and once again, it's not shortwave.


It's entirely possible that the OP didn't realize he could listen to BBC on
the net. Shortwave is no longer the only (or best) way to get it.

Sheesh!


Back atcha.

Mike


  #9   Report Post  
Old December 30th 06, 04:13 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,243
Default BBC Reception in Los Angeles



Mike wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...
Yes, and once again, it's not shortwave.


It's entirely possible that the OP didn't realize he could listen to BBC on
the net.


Well you've told him, and now you both can run along!

dxAce
Michigan
USA



  #10   Report Post  
Old December 30th 06, 08:39 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 133
Default BBC Reception in Los Angeles

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Mike wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...
Yes, and once again, it's not shortwave.


It's entirely possible that the OP didn't realize he could listen to BBC
on
the net.


Well you've told him, and now you both can run along!


And you have told us that "it's not shortwave", so you can run along!

Mike



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AM (Medium Wave) Radio Reception - Tips and Links RHF Shortwave 0 April 21st 06 06:01 AM
Cambridge Soundworks CD740 Radio - Reception Questions ???? RHF Broadcasting 0 September 21st 04 03:43 AM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Shortwave 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
Phoenix Az fire on 800mhz L ORANGE TOO JA MORAN Scanner 0 September 13th 03 06:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017