LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old January 30th 07, 10:32 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,243
Default Worldband vs. Shortwave on Google Trends



d wrote:

What is, and has been, needed is fresh blood in the hobby. How many
THOUSAND more hams would there be right NOW if the dumbasses (you know
who you are) that have fought dropping the pathetically obsolete
requirement for Morse hadn't been so short-sighted?


Short sighted? How many THOUSAND more hams would there be right now if the
dumbasses (you know who you are) would have buckled down and learned a measly
five words per minute?




 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Shortwave-radio era looks short-lived" Mike Terry Shortwave 3 March 31st 08 12:57 AM
In-Door {In-the-Room} Coax Cable {Shielded} Magnetic Loop Antennas for Listening to the Shortwave Bands (SWL) RHF Shortwave 0 January 15th 07 08:50 AM
Shortwave Listener (SWL) Frequency & Schedule Resources that are available "OnLine" { Links / URLS } RHF Shortwave 1 January 6th 05 04:00 PM
Too late for DRM on shortwave? Mike Terry Shortwave 9 November 29th 04 03:50 PM
WHERE ARE ALL THE TOUGH GUYS IN THIS SHORTWAVE NEWSGROUP? LLOYD DAVIES N0VFP General 0 July 4th 03 04:21 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017