Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
HD AM in NJ/NY ?
wrote If that is true, then why is news/talk/.sport so popular at night. Says you? bwaHAHAHA!!!! |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
HD AM in NJ/NY ?
On Feb 16, 3:50�pm, "Guerite�" wrote:
wrote If that is true, then why is news/talk/.sport so popular at night. Says you? *bwaHAHAHA!!!! So, how much did you **** away, on your worthless HD radios ? bwaHAHAHA!!!! |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
HD AM in NJ/NY ?
On Feb 16, 3:47?pm, "Guerite?" wrote:
You argue like a two year old. wrote Neo-Liberal non-logic You, talk like a one-year-old. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
HD AM in NJ/NY ?
"David" wrote in message ... On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:39:58 -0800, "David Eduardo" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... Have you ever listened to AM (MW) HD? The voices sound MUCH better than analog! It's actually pleasant to listen to. But, they are only HD during the day, so they're almost useless, except on weekends! That's why WINS AM is on FM-HD2, so that it can be on all day and night. But there is so little AM listening at night that it really does not matter, business wise. Broadcasting in the public interest includes the night. And what interest is served by a band that becomes unused and irrelevant? Only a few percent of all listeners under 35 ever listen to AM (in other words, under 10%) and that figure declines every year. Anyway, younger listeners have chosen to pretty much ignore AM all day, and the few remaining ones use the band even less at night. This is a listener decision, not a station one. Further, a station may choose what listener group it is going to serve, including by age, sex, ethnicity, etc. Service does not mean serving all people alike... just some of them. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
HD AM in NJ/NY ?
wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 16, 5:39?am, "David Eduardo" wrote: wrote in message As I said, news/talk/sports on AM is alive-and-well and command higher ad dollars than FM. You are just one of the naysayers, who shill IBOC,as the great savior. The FM band is already over-crowded and there is no big move from AM to FM. News/talkers on AM get "market rates" that are identical for each demograsphic target to FMs. A station with 50,000 AQH listeners on AM will get the same rate as one on FM, not more... as long as you are comparing the same demos. AM news talk stations do NOT get higher rates for equivalent listenrship than FMs do. I did not say AM statios were turning in their licences and getting new FM licences. Operators are moving ageing talk formats from AM to FM to improve the younger demo performance... KTAR AM in Phoenix moved to FM, making the AM all sports after moving the sports format from another, inferior AM whcih will be sold or donated. WTOP AM in Washington, DC, a 50 kw AM, moved 100% to FM and put an experimental format on the AM in conjunction with a local newswpaper. KSL in Salt Lake City began simulcasting in 2006 with an FM to improve younger demos... despite KSL being a 1A clear channel. WNLS in Tallahassee moved the n/t format to FM, leaving sports on the AM. Clear Channel has started FM news talkers in Pittsburg and New Orleans from scratch. The P'burg one already beats AMer KDKA significantly in 25-54, and the NO one is dramatically impacting WWL, clear channel 870. Cox has begun simulcasting is Jacksonville and Dayton AM talkers on FM to improved the greying demos and lake of sales growth on the AM band. And the story is just beginning. News talk can't survive long on AM as the demos are old and unsalable, so more and more will move to FM. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
HD AM in NJ/NY ?
wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 16, 5:39?am, "David Eduardo" wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Have you ever listened to AM (MW) HD? The voices sound MUCH better than analog! It's actually pleasant to listen to. But, they are only HD during the day, so they're almost useless, except on weekends! That's why WINS AM is on FM-HD2, so that it can be on all day and night. But there is so little AM listening at night that it really does not matter, business wise. If that is true, then why is news/talk/.sport so popular at night. It isn't. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
HD AM in NJ/NY ?
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 01:53:32 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote: And what interest is served by a band that becomes unused and irrelevant? Only a few percent of all listeners under 35 ever listen to AM (in other words, under 10%) That's still millions of people. You are a whore. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
HD AM in NJ/NY ?
On Feb 17, 12:03?am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 16, 5:39?am, "David Eduardo" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Have you ever listened to AM (MW) HD? The voices sound MUCH better than analog! It's actually pleasant to listen to. But, they are only HD during the day, so they're almost useless, except on weekends! That's why WINS AM is on FM-HD2, so that it can be on all day and night. But there is so little AM listening at night that it really does not matter, business wise. If that is true, then why is news/talk/.sport so popular at night. It isn't. Another IBOC shill, full-of-**** ! |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
HD AM in NJ/NY ?
On Feb 17, 12:02?am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 16, 5:39?am, "David Eduardo" wrote: wrote in message As I said, news/talk/sports on AM is alive-and-well and command higher ad dollars than FM. You are just one of the naysayers, who shill IBOC,as the great savior. The FM band is already over-crowded and there is no big move from AM to FM. News/talkers on AM get "market rates" that are identical for each demograsphic target to FMs. A station with 50,000 AQH listeners on AM will get the same rate as one on FM, not more... as long as you are comparing the same demos. AM news talk stations do NOT get higher rates for equivalent listenrship than FMs do. I did not say AM statios were turning in their licences and getting new FM licences. Operators are moving ageing talk formats from AM to FM to improve the younger demo performance... KTAR AM in Phoenix moved to FM, making the AM all sports after moving the sports format from another, inferior AM whcih will be sold or donated. WTOP AM in Washington, DC, a 50 kw AM, moved 100% to FM and put an experimental format on the AM in conjunction with a local newswpaper. KSL in Salt Lake City began simulcasting in 2006 with an FM to improve younger demos... despite KSL being a 1A clear channel. WNLS in Tallahassee moved the n/t format to FM, leaving sports on the AM. Clear Channel has started FM news talkers in Pittsburg and New Orleans from scratch. The P'burg one already beats AMer KDKA significantly in 25-54, and the NO one is dramatically impacting WWL, clear channel 870. Cox has begun simulcasting is Jacksonville and Dayton AM talkers on FM to improved the greying demos and lake of sales growth on the AM band. And the story is just beginning. News talk can't survive long on AM as the demos are old and unsalable, so more and more will move to FM. There's not enough room on FM |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
HD AM in NJ/NY ?
On Feb 17, 12:02?am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 16, 5:39?am, "David Eduardo" wrote: wrote in message As I said, news/talk/sports on AM is alive-and-well and command higher ad dollars than FM. You are just one of the naysayers, who shill IBOC,as the great savior. The FM band is already over-crowded and there is no big move from AM to FM. News/talkers on AM get "market rates" that are identical for each demograsphic target to FMs. A station with 50,000 AQH listeners on AM will get the same rate as one on FM, not more... as long as you are comparing the same demos. AM news talk stations do NOT get higher rates for equivalent listenrship than FMs do. I did not say AM statios were turning in their licences and getting new FM licences. Operators are moving ageing talk formats from AM to FM to improve the younger demo performance... KTAR AM in Phoenix moved to FM, making the AM all sports after moving the sports format from another, inferior AM whcih will be sold or donated. WTOP AM in Washington, DC, a 50 kw AM, moved 100% to FM and put an experimental format on the AM in conjunction with a local newswpaper. KSL in Salt Lake City began simulcasting in 2006 with an FM to improve younger demos... despite KSL being a 1A clear channel. WNLS in Tallahassee moved the n/t format to FM, leaving sports on the AM. Clear Channel has started FM news talkers in Pittsburg and New Orleans from scratch. The P'burg one already beats AMer KDKA significantly in 25-54, and the NO one is dramatically impacting WWL, clear channel 870. Cox has begun simulcasting is Jacksonville and Dayton AM talkers on FM to improved the greying demos and lake of sales growth on the AM band. And the story is just beginning. News talk can't survive long on AM as the demos are old and unsalable, so more and more will move to FM. "FM Translators for AM Stations?" "And this might not be the best case. As you may remember, the FCC already has an open proceeding trying to determine the relative value of FM translators versus low power FM stations. That proceeding seeks to determine if low power FM stations should receive a preference over FM translators. That proceeding also put a freeze on the processing of all new FM translator applications - a freeze that was supposed to last 6 months but has now been in place for almost a year and a half. Since the FM translators that would be authorized by the NAB proposal could also preclude LPFM stations, as well as be precluded by the translators still pending from the last FM translator window, the opportunity to file for translators for AM stations may be technically precluded in some areas, and may not be able to occur until the LPFM issues are resolved. And none of that may come quickly." http://www.broadcastlawblog.com/arch...-stations.html You lose ! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|