wrote in message
ps.com...
On Feb 17, 12:03?am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...
On Feb 16, 5:39?am, "David Eduardo" wrote:

wrote in message

oups.com...

Have you ever listened to AM (MW) HD? The voices sound MUCH better
than analog!
It's actually pleasant to listen to. But, they are only HD during the
day, so they're almost useless, except on weekends! That's why WINS
AM is on FM-HD2, so that it can be on all day and night.

But there is so little AM listening at night that it really does not
matter,
business wise.
If that is true, then why is news/talk/.sport so popular at night.

It isn't.

Another IBOC shill, full-of-**** !

OK, potty mouth: show me how there is so much listening to AM news talk at
night that we could apply the term "popular" to it.

Remember, we need numbers of persons, not share. A 10 share in 7PM-Midnight
is less than a 2 share at 7AM in terms of people. A 20 share at 11 PM is
less people than a 1 share at 7 AM.

Example: At 7 AM, 2.6 million people are listening to radio in Los Angeles,
19.5% of whom are listening to AM
At 11 PM, of the 500,000 listening to radio, only 2.3% were listening to AM.
So not only does AM command a very small percentage of peak hour listening,
it even underperforms its own weak overall showing in evening hours.

Then, looking at younger demos, in 12 to 34, 7 AM, AM has only a 5.9 share
of radio listening, and at 11 PM it is down to a 2.3% share.

So, AM night listening is dismal 12+, and nearly non-existent at night!

David Frackelton Gleason, still posing as 'Eduardo', tried yet again to BS the
masses when he wrote:

wrote in message
ps.com...
On Feb 17, 12:03?am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...
On Feb 16, 5:39?am, "David Eduardo" wrote:

wrote in message

oups.com...

Have you ever listened to AM (MW) HD? The voices sound MUCH better
than analog!
It's actually pleasant to listen to. But, they are only HD during the
day, so they're almost useless, except on weekends! That's why WINS
AM is on FM-HD2, so that it can be on all day and night.

But there is so little AM listening at night that it really does not
matter,
business wise.
If that is true, then why is news/talk/.sport so popular at night.

It isn't.

Another IBOC shill, full-of-**** !

OK, potty mouth: show me how there is so much listening to AM news talk at
night that we could apply the term "popular" to it.

Remember, we need numbers of persons, not share. A 10 share in 7PM-Midnight
is less than a 2 share at 7AM in terms of people. A 20 share at 11 PM is
less people than a 1 share at 7 AM.

Example: At 7 AM, 2.6 million people are listening to radio in Los Angeles,
19.5% of whom are listening to AM
At 11 PM, of the 500,000 listening to radio, only 2.3% were listening to AM.
So not only does AM command a very small percentage of peak hour listening,
it even underperforms its own weak overall showing in evening hours.

Then, looking at younger demos, in 12 to 34, 7 AM, AM has only a 5.9 share
of radio listening, and at 11 PM it is down to a 2.3% share.

So, AM night listening is dismal 12+, and nearly non-existent at night!

Let's forget for a moment that you're a known pathological liar and a fake
Hispanic and ask ourselves what does the above have to do with the fact that
you're a shill for IBOC?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Frackelton Gleason, still posing as 'Eduardo', tried yet again to BS
the
masses when he wrote:

It's my legal name and has been for over 5 decades, you fool.


So, AM night listening is dismal 12+, and nearly non-existent at night!

Let's forget for a moment that you're a known pathological liar

An impression formed only in your twisted, welfare-dependent mind.

and a fake
Hispanic

"Hispanic" is a culture. I am culturally Hispanic. I don't understand how
this is such a big deal. Were I to have been lost in the Amazonian forrest
at age 13, and raised by Aucas, I would culturally be an Auca 5 decades
later.

and ask ourselves what does the above have to do with the fact that
you're a shill for IBOC?

Actually, I am hopeful (but not optimistic) that AM can be saved as a useful
part of radio's offerings to the public based on improving its quality and
perception. HD is about the only viable answer we have right now...
otherwise, we can write off AM in the next 5 to 10 years, totally.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Frackelton Gleason, still posing as 'Eduardo', tried yet again to BS
the
masses when he wrote:

It's my legal name and has been for over 5 decades, you fool.


So, AM night listening is dismal 12+, and nearly non-existent at night!

Let's forget for a moment that you're a known pathological liar

An impression formed only in your twisted, welfare-dependent mind.

Welfare?



and a fake
Hispanic

"Hispanic" is a culture. I am culturally Hispanic. I don't understand how
this is such a big deal. Were I to have been lost in the Amazonian forrest
at age 13, and raised by Aucas, I would culturally be an Auca 5 decades
later.

You've been a fake Hispanic since c.2000 when you dreamed up the 'Eduardo'
shtick.



and ask ourselves what does the above have to do with the fact that
you're a shill for IBOC?

Actually, I am hopeful (but not optimistic) that AM can be saved as a useful
part of radio's offerings to the public based on improving its quality and
perception. HD is about the only viable answer we have right now...

Yeah, since it needs saving might as well QRM!

LMFAO at the pathological prancing fool.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:



An impression formed only in your twisted, welfare-dependent mind.

Welfare?

I see. Your income comes from where?

"Hispanic" is a culture. I am culturally Hispanic. I don't understand how
this is such a big deal. Were I to have been lost in the Amazonian
forrest
at age 13, and raised by Aucas, I would culturally be an Auca 5 decades
later.

You've been a fake Hispanic since c.2000 when you dreamed up the 'Eduardo'
shtick.

Actually, it was given me at the time of my baptism... which was about 50
years before the date you name

and ask ourselves what does the above have to do with the fact that
you're a shill for IBOC?

Actually, I am hopeful (but not optimistic) that AM can be saved as a
useful
part of radio's offerings to the public based on improving its quality
and
perception. HD is about the only viable answer we have right now...

Yeah, since it needs saving might as well QRM!

The way you seem to prefer is to reduce interference by having stations fall
silent.

Nobody but a few DXers really cares abut adjacent channel reception in the
shadow of a powerful local signal.

David Frackelton Gleason, still posing as 'Eduardo', yet again spewed BS when he
wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:



An impression formed only in your twisted, welfare-dependent mind.

Welfare?

I see. Your income comes from where?

Several sources, none of them being welfare, prancer boy!



"Hispanic" is a culture. I am culturally Hispanic. I don't understand how
this is such a big deal. Were I to have been lost in the Amazonian
forrest
at age 13, and raised by Aucas, I would culturally be an Auca 5 decades
later.

You've been a fake Hispanic since c.2000 when you dreamed up the 'Eduardo'
shtick.

Actually, it was given me at the time of my baptism... which was about 50
years before the date you name

Absolutely pathological!





and ask ourselves what does the above have to do with the fact that
you're a shill for IBOC?

Actually, I am hopeful (but not optimistic) that AM can be saved as a
useful
part of radio's offerings to the public based on improving its quality
and
perception. HD is about the only viable answer we have right now...

Yeah, since it needs saving might as well QRM!

The way you seem to prefer is to reduce interference by having stations fall
silent.

No, I'd like them to drop HD/IBOC. Pay attention, prancer!



Nobody but a few DXers really cares abut adjacent channel reception in the
shadow of a powerful local signal.

Nobody?

Still LMFAO at the pathological prancing fool.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Gleason, wrote:

Welfare?

I see. Your income comes from where?

Several sources, none of them being welfare, prancer boy!

All of them sharing the commonality that they come from the government, as
opposed to money you earned, right?

Actually, it was given me at the time of my baptism... which was about 50
years before the date you name

Absolutely pathological!

Just simply true...
....

Yeah, since it needs saving might as well QRM!

The way you seem to prefer is to reduce interference by having stations
fall
silent.

No, I'd like them to drop HD/IBOC. Pay attention, prancer!

Considering that AM is dying (nearly nobody under 35 ever listens) what you
are saying is that you want th eonly potentially viable solution for AM to
be discarded, which will result in a guarantee that AM will die, and soon.



Nobody but a few DXers really cares abut adjacent channel reception in
the
shadow of a powerful local signal.

Nobody?

Yeah, statistically, nobody.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Frackelton Gleason, still posing as 'Eduardo', tried yet again to BS
the
masses when he wrote:

It's my legal name and has been for over 5 decades, you fool.

That's real funny! Nobody back home in Cleveland seems to recall that.

Keep trying the BS, you might hit on something that works one of these days.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Frackelton Gleason, still posing as 'Eduardo', tried yet again to
BS
the
masses when he wrote:

It's my legal name and has been for over 5 decades, you fool.

That's real funny! Nobody back home in Cleveland seems to recall that.

Nobody "back home" would remember as I have nearly no family there and left
a decade before the time adult friendships are developed. Who in the would
_would_ know? Of course, on my first daughter's birth certificate, dated
1965, the "father's name" has "Eduardo" as my second given name.

There you go... but I fail to see how it matters what name I have and use.
J. Paul Getty chose to use his second given name as opposed to the first
one... it was his choice, and he used it most of his life. Was he a fake
because he liked one name more than another?

You seem to attach importance to things that are either unimportant or just
matters of personal choice.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Frackelton Gleason, still posing as 'Eduardo', tried yet again to
BS
the
masses when he wrote:

It's my legal name and has been for over 5 decades, you fool.

That's real funny! Nobody back home in Cleveland seems to recall that.

Nobody "back home" would remember as I have nearly no family there and left
a decade before the time adult friendships are developed. Who in the would
_would_ know?

Obviously several people and/or institutions!

Of course, on my first daughter's birth certificate, dated
1965, the "father's name" has "Eduardo" as my second given name.

I somehow doubt that, but hey, it's YOUR fantasy, not mine.



There you go... but I fail to see how it matters what name I have and use.
J. Paul Getty chose to use his second given name as opposed to the first
one... it was his choice, and he used it most of his life. Was he a fake
because he liked one name more than another?

You seem to attach importance to things that are either unimportant or just
matters of personal choice.

Nah, I just attach importance to things I know are BS.

Keep the laughs coming, prancer boy!

dxAce
Michigan
USA