Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
WSCR 670 Chicago switched on IBOC at 5:34 am this morning, covering
WFAN 660 NYC lsb listening in Central Ohio. What's going on? Is there nighttime IBOC now? -- Ron Hardin On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ron Hardin" wrote in message ... WSCR 670 Chicago switched on IBOC at 5:34 am this morning, covering WFAN 660 NYC lsb listening in Central Ohio. What's going on? Is there nighttime IBOC now? -- No, no night HD, but stations, including daytimers, can conduct testing in the overnight hours. So it could be either a test or a mistake. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 1, 7:48 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Ron Hardin" wrote in message ... WSCR 670 Chicago switched on IBOC at 5:34 am this morning, covering WFAN 660 NYC lsb listening in Central Ohio. What's going on? Is there nighttime IBOC now? -- No, no night HD, but stations, including daytimers, can conduct testing in the overnight hours. So it could be either a test or a mistake. I think the latter, and not just in this instance, but in general. AM IBOC is for the birds. Nothing personal (unlike some others here), but you gotta get off this AM-IBOC kick. It will be the ruination of what still is a great way to broadcast. Bruce Jensen |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Eduardo wrote: "Ron Hardin" wrote in message ... WSCR 670 Chicago switched on IBOC at 5:34 am this morning, covering WFAN 660 NYC lsb listening in Central Ohio. What's going on? Is there nighttime IBOC now? -- No, no night HD, but stations, including daytimers, can conduct testing in the overnight hours. So it could be either a test or a mistake. Yes, IBOC is a mistake, no doubt about it. dxAce Michigan USA |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 05:35:31 -0800, Radiola wrote:
What is IBOC? "In Band On Channel", aka "HD Radio". A system for transmitting a digital radio signal "on the same frequency" as the analog signal. Actually, the digital signal is transmitted in the adjacent channels - for AM, two channels each side of the analog; for FM, one channel each side. For example, in WSCR's case: - Analog: 665-675KHz - Lower Digital: 655.3-665.1KHz - Upper Digital: 674.9-684.7KHz It's not currently authorized for regular nighttime use on AM stations, because of severe interference to skywave reception. Here in the States they're still working on finding a way to allow nighttime use. (possibly including simply deciding skywave reception is obsolete and accepting the interference) It's looking like the Canadians have ruled out nighttime AM IBOC altogether. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Radiola" wrote in message oups.com... What is IBOC? Digital AM & FM radio broadcasting. - http://www.hdradio.com Digital IBOC/HD FM stations are almost CD quality while digital IBOC/HD AM stations are in stereo with FM quality. Once you get it you'll never go back to analog. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 1, 5:27?pm, ".del.icio.us" wrote:
"Radiola" wrote in message oups.com... What is IBOC? Digital AM & FM radio broadcasting. -http://www.hdradio.com Digital IBOC/HD FM stations are almost CD quality while digital IBOC/HD AM stations are in stereo with FM quality. Once you get it you'll never go back to analog. More bull**** from another DE IBOC hustler/shill ! Hustle this: "In-Stat: Digital Radio Set to Take Off" "In 2006, 73 percent of respondents to an In-Stat U.S. consumer survey were aware of HD Radio on some level." http://beradio.com/eyeoniboc/instat-digital-radio-set/ "Sirius, XM, and HD: Consumer interest reality check" (Alexaholic) "While interest in satellite radio is diminishing, interest in HD shows no signs of a pulse." http://www.hear2.com/2007/02/sirius_....html#comments This just confirms, the lack of interest for HD Radio, on Google Trends: http://www.google.com/trends?q=%22hd... =all&date=all "Rethinking AM's Future" "Only 175 or so AM stations have even licensed AM-HD. For a number of reasons, quite a few have tried it and taken it off the air, or so the anecdotal evidence suggests. Ibiquity no longer reports in its public summaries whether a station is on the air. Making AM-HD work well as a long-term investment is seen as an expensive and risky challenge for most stations and their owners. With the bulk of successful AMs airing news, talk and sports, the improved fidelity advantage of HD and stereo seem only marginally attractive. There is the significant downside of potential new interference to some of their own AM analog listeners as well as listeners of adjacent-channel stations. And of course we still have no nighttime authority for AM-HD." http://www.rwonline.com/pages/s.0044/t.557.html Existing RDS has the same texting functions, as HD/IBOC. For now, HD Radio/IBOC is dead. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
Der Arschloch mit meteorism.
|
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "Ron Hardin" wrote in message ... WSCR 670 Chicago switched on IBOC at 5:34 am this morning, covering WFAN 660 NYC lsb listening in Central Ohio. What's going on? Is there nighttime IBOC now? -- No, no night HD, but stations, including daytimers, can conduct testing in the overnight hours. So it could be either a test or a mistake. Yes, IBOC is a mistake, no doubt about it. dxAce Michigan USA Mistake my ass! It's the answer to the Beaner-Blaster AM stations taking over the AM band. AM IBOC sounds a LOT better than analog AM ever has or will. I for one am sick and tired of hearing "OOOMPA" music and dreaded mariachi crap at stoplights, emanating from a beat up Ford aerostar van.... The Beaners wont buy HD radios. IBOC can turn a burrito-blaster back into a good AM station and a moneymaker in the longrun. Not only is IBOC making headway, but so is DRM.....getting big and working well in Europe. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Porgy Tirebiter wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "Ron Hardin" wrote in message ... WSCR 670 Chicago switched on IBOC at 5:34 am this morning, covering WFAN 660 NYC lsb listening in Central Ohio. What's going on? Is there nighttime IBOC now? -- No, no night HD, but stations, including daytimers, can conduct testing in the overnight hours. So it could be either a test or a mistake. Yes, IBOC is a mistake, no doubt about it. dxAce Michigan USA Mistake my ass! It's the answer to the Beaner-Blaster AM stations taking over the AM band. AM IBOC sounds a LOT better than analog AM ever has or will. I for one am sick and tired of hearing "OOOMPA" music and dreaded mariachi crap at stoplights, emanating from a beat up Ford aerostar van.... The Beaners wont buy HD radios. IBOC can turn a burrito-blaster back into a good AM station and a moneymaker in the longrun. Not only is IBOC making headway, but so is DRM.....getting big and working well in Europe. They both suck, and are an annoying source of QRM. Next time we come over the pond once again to save your sorry ass's we'll have to dismantle that stuff. dxAce Michigan USA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Looks like iNiquity may get its way on nighttime AM IBOC ! | Shortwave | |||
NAB wants to ruin AM radio: | Shortwave | |||
Spectrum plot of an IBOC AM station | Shortwave | |||
IBOC interference complaint - advice? | Broadcasting |