Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geoffrey S. Mendelson ) writes:
HD Radio Fan wrote: A radio that uses a built-in generator would be much easier to carry around and keep charged up than your other alternatives. AM, FM and weather channel coverage is far far more imprtant than shortwave in an emergency radio. Only in the U.S. The original poster to this thread is in Canada. Close enough? Are there Canadian weather brodcasts on VHF? NOAA is a U.S. government agency. But presumably because there existed dedicated receivers for those weather broadcasts in the US, Canada followed. So there is a chain of weather broadcast stations here in Canada using the same frequencies as in the US. Of course, the location reference was that shortwave reception wasn't particularly useful in the US (so yes, properly it would have made sense to use "North America" there), since in North America the shortwave stations are generally not news sources. Michael |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hurricane Katrina HF Response and Recovery Frequencies | Shortwave | |||
Brief blurb in Fox News on ham emergency comms for New orleans | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Gulf States Hurricane Nets Guide | Shortwave | |||
Amateurs Handle Emergency Comms in Wake of Hurricane Ivan | Shortwave |