"dxAce" wrote in message
...


"Guerite©" wrote:

Propaganda Ejaculate Castrated
snip

How does this affect terrestrial broadcasters who stream?

The principles are exactly the same, but at the individual radio
station
level, the dollar amounts are of course are smaller. Clear Channel's
total
corporate obligation for November 2006 based on comScore Arbitron
ratings
and assuming 13 songs per hour, would be about $500,000... but if
that's
for streaming, let's say, 500 stations, it would only be a royalty
obligation of about $1,000 per station per month in 2006. Are those
stations
selling enough online spots and website banners and sponsorships to make
that affordable? I'm not sure. (The decision has no impact on news and
talk stations who stream.)

Is this the end of Internet radio?

Although this is undeniably a huge victory for the legal departments of
record labels (or at least for the lawyers at their industry trade
association, the RIAA), I doubt that the heads of the record labels and
their marketing executives actually want to see Internet radio driven
out of
business. (This may be a case of "Be careful what you wish for, you may
get
it.")

http://www.kurthanson.com/archive/ne...07/index.shtml
__________________________________________________ ________

Is this the end of HD radio?

LOL - Hardly. Maybe the second on air HD-"2" stream will have to be
turned
off since the small local radio operator would essentially have to pay
royalties for two radio stations. On the other hand this extra
available
bandwidth of a former HD-"2" stream can then be used for full CD like HD
fidelity. Stations broadcasting HD-2 signals don't sound as good as
stations utilizing the full bandwidth on a single "HD-1" stream.

In any case, HD sounds far better than any analog signal. HD radio
stations
will abandon analog and redirect the full station power of their
amplifiers
towards the HD digital stream.

They'd better get some HD listeners before they do that, elsewise their
listeners will abandon them.


They already are abandoning analog radio - to DIGITAL delivery systems such
as the internet, XM & Sirius.

Every young person I know has an MP3 player/iPod which is used to listen to
songs, in DIGITAL format, downloaded for free from the internet. They DO
NOT listen to ANALOG AM or FM radio stations like the youth of your
generation used to do.

The only means open for analog FM radio stations have to compete is to offer
CD quality for FREE = HD! The only means open for analog AM radio's
survival is HD!

Once you have experienced HD you will never go back to analog.

"Guerite©" wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


"Guerite©" wrote:

Propaganda Ejaculate Castrated
snip

How does this affect terrestrial broadcasters who stream?

The principles are exactly the same, but at the individual radio
station
level, the dollar amounts are of course are smaller. Clear Channel's
total
corporate obligation for November 2006 based on comScore Arbitron
ratings
and assuming 13 songs per hour, would be about $500,000... but if
that's
for streaming, let's say, 500 stations, it would only be a royalty
obligation of about $1,000 per station per month in 2006. Are those
stations
selling enough online spots and website banners and sponsorships to make
that affordable? I'm not sure. (The decision has no impact on news and
talk stations who stream.)

Is this the end of Internet radio?

Although this is undeniably a huge victory for the legal departments of
record labels (or at least for the lawyers at their industry trade
association, the RIAA), I doubt that the heads of the record labels and
their marketing executives actually want to see Internet radio driven
out of
business. (This may be a case of "Be careful what you wish for, you may
get
it.")

http://www.kurthanson.com/archive/ne...07/index.shtml
__________________________________________________ ________

Is this the end of HD radio?

LOL - Hardly. Maybe the second on air HD-"2" stream will have to be
turned
off since the small local radio operator would essentially have to pay
royalties for two radio stations. On the other hand this extra
available
bandwidth of a former HD-"2" stream can then be used for full CD like HD
fidelity. Stations broadcasting HD-2 signals don't sound as good as
stations utilizing the full bandwidth on a single "HD-1" stream.

In any case, HD sounds far better than any analog signal. HD radio
stations
will abandon analog and redirect the full station power of their
amplifiers
towards the HD digital stream.

They'd better get some HD listeners before they do that, elsewise their
listeners will abandon them.


They already are abandoning analog radio - to DIGITAL delivery systems such
as the internet, XM & Sirius.

Every young person I know has an MP3 player/iPod which is used to listen to
songs, in DIGITAL format, downloaded for free from the internet. They DO
NOT listen to ANALOG AM or FM radio stations like the youth of your
generation used to do.

The only means open for analog FM radio stations have to compete is to offer
CD quality for FREE = HD! The only means open for analog AM radio's
survival is HD!

As Dick Cheney says: Hogwash!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

On Mar 5, 5:54�pm, "Guerite�" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...







"Guerite©" wrote:

Propaganda Ejaculate Castrated
snip

How does this affect terrestrial broadcasters who stream?

The principles are exactly *the same, but at the individual radio
station
level, the dollar amounts are of course are smaller. Clear Channel's
total
corporate obligation for November 2006 based on comScore Arbitron
ratings
and assuming 13 songs per hour, *would be about $500,000... but if
that's
for streaming, let's say, 500 stations, it would only be a royalty
obligation of about $1,000 per station per month in 2006. Are those
stations
selling enough online spots and website banners and sponsorships to make
that affordable? *I'm not sure. *(The decision has no impact on news and
talk stations who stream.)

Is this the end of Internet radio?

Although this is undeniably a huge victory for the legal departments of
record labels (or at least for the lawyers at their industry trade
association, the RIAA), I doubt that the heads of the record labels and
their marketing executives actually want to see Internet radio driven
out of
business. (This may be a case of "Be careful what you wish for, you may
get
it.")

http://www.kurthanson.com/archive/ne...07/index.shtml
__________________________________________________ ________

Is this the end of HD radio?

LOL - Hardly. *Maybe the second on air HD-"2" stream will have to be
turned
off since the small local radio operator would essentially have to pay
royalties for two radio stations. *On the other hand this extra
available
bandwidth of a former HD-"2" stream can then be used for full CD like HD
fidelity. *Stations broadcasting HD-2 signals don't sound as good as
stations utilizing the full bandwidth on a single "HD-1" stream.

In any case, HD sounds far better than any analog signal. *HD radio
stations
will abandon analog and redirect the full station power of their
amplifiers
towards the HD digital stream.

They'd better get some HD listeners before they do that, elsewise their
listeners will abandon them.

They already are abandoning analog radio - to DIGITAL delivery systems such
as the internet, XM & Sirius.

Every young person I know has an MP3 player/iPod which is used to listen to
songs, in DIGITAL format, downloaded for free from the internet. *They DO
NOT listen to ANALOG AM or FM radio stations like the youth of your
generation used to do.

The only means open for analog FM radio stations have to compete is to offer
CD quality for FREE = HD! *The only means open for analog AM radio's
survival is HD!

Once you have experienced HD you will never go back to analog.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Slight problem - consumers are not interested in HD Radio.

wrote

They'd better get some HD listeners before they do that, elsewise their
listeners will abandon them.

They already are abandoning analog radio - to DIGITAL delivery systems
such
as the internet, XM & Sirius.

Every young person I know has an MP3 player/iPod which is used to listen
to
songs, in DIGITAL format, downloaded for free from the internet. They DO
NOT listen to ANALOG AM or FM radio stations like the youth of your
generation used to do.

The only means open for analog FM radio stations have to compete is to
offer
CD quality for FREE = HD! The only means open for analog AM radio's
survival is HD!

Once you have experienced HD you will never go back to analog.

Slight problem - consumers are not interested in HD Radio.

Because consumers are ignorant and do not understand ANALog OR HD radio.
They do not understand what is HD radio. http://www.HDRadio.com
All they know is that their iPods and MP3 players give them what they want -
FREE Digital quality music.

YOU HAVE TO DELIVER WHAT THE CONSUMER WANTS and it isn't analog.

On Mar 5, 7:09�pm, "Guerite�" wrote:
wrote







They'd better get some HD listeners before they do that, elsewise their
listeners will abandon them.

They already are abandoning analog radio - to DIGITAL delivery systems
such
as the internet, XM & Sirius.

Every young person I know has an MP3 player/iPod which is used to listen
to
songs, in DIGITAL format, downloaded for free from the internet. They DO
NOT listen to ANALOG AM or FM radio stations like the youth of your
generation used to do.

The only means open for analog FM radio stations have to compete is to
offer
CD quality for FREE = HD! The only means open for analog AM radio's
survival is HD!

Once you have experienced HD you will never go back to analog.
Slight problem - consumers are not interested in HD Radio.

Because consumers are ignorant and do not understand ANALog *OR HD radio.
They do not understand what is HD radio.http://www.HDRadio.com
All they know is that their iPods and MP3 players give them what they want -
FREE Digital quality music.

YOU HAVE TO DELIVER WHAT THE CONSUMER WANTS and it isn't analog.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"In-Stat: Digital Radio Set to Take Off"

"In 2006, 73 percent of respondents to an In-Stat U.S. consumer survey
were aware of HD Radio on some level"

http://beradio.com/eyeoniboc/instat-digital-radio-set/

Consumers know about HD Radio, but are not interested - you lose !

On Mar 5, 7:09�pm, "Guerite�" wrote:
wrote







They'd better get some HD listeners before they do that, elsewise their
listeners will abandon them.

They already are abandoning analog radio - to DIGITAL delivery systems
such
as the internet, XM & Sirius.

Every young person I know has an MP3 player/iPod which is used to listen
to
songs, in DIGITAL format, downloaded for free from the internet. They DO
NOT listen to ANALOG AM or FM radio stations like the youth of your
generation used to do.

The only means open for analog FM radio stations have to compete is to
offer
CD quality for FREE = HD! The only means open for analog AM radio's
survival is HD!

Once you have experienced HD you will never go back to analog.
Slight problem - consumers are not interested in HD Radio.

Because consumers are ignorant and do not understand ANALog *OR HD radio.
They do not understand what is HD radio.http://www.HDRadio.com
All they know is that their iPods and MP3 players give them what they want -
FREE Digital quality music.

YOU HAVE TO DELIVER WHAT THE CONSUMER WANTS and it isn't analog.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"In-Stat: Digital Radio Set to Take Off"

"In 2006, 73 percent of respondents to an In-Stat U.S. consumer survey
were aware of HD Radio on some level"

http://beradio.com/eyeoniboc/instat-digital-radio-set/

Consumers know about HD Radio, but are not interested - you lose !