Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote HD's channels are low-bitrate streams The station has a certain digital HD bandwidth that they can utilize as they wish. They can allocate the full HD bandwidth to a single channel for the best sound. On FM that would result in a CD quality sound. Or they can divy up the bandwidth into 2 or 3 channels for lesser quality sound in each channel. of the same repetitive programming If a station chooses to transmit two (2) HD channels, and many do, the second HD channel's programming (HD2) is unique while the first HD channel is the superioir sounding digital version of the analog signal broadcast. causing adjacent-channel interference Digital is digital - there is no static, noise, interference or fading whatsoever on HD radio. and with only 60% the coverage of analog. Using 1/100th the power of the equivelent analog's signal carrier. Thus a power savings to the station. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Guerite©" wrote in message ... and with only 60% the coverage of analog. Using 1/100th the power of the equivelent analog's signal carrier. Thus a power savings to the station. And, as discussed, on FM the "used" coverage area is the 64 dbu curve. Over 80% of listening is in the 70 dbu, and the rest in the 64 to 69 dbu contour. The HD signal at least matches the 64 dbu useful and used contour. On AM, the HD signal is often listenable beyond the "used and useful" contour of the analog signal. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Eduardo" wrote On AM, the HD signal is often listenable beyond the "used and useful" contour of the analog signal. My personal best HD DX catch on AM is about 1000 miles. It is incredible to hear a digital AM DX signal locked in on a HD receiver. Instant ID and far better reception than the analog signal. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 5, 7:36�pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Guerite©" wrote in message ... and with only 60% the coverage of analog. Using 1/100th the power of the equivelent analog's signal carrier. *Thus a power savings to the station. And, as discussed, on FM the "used" coverage area is the 64 dbu curve. Over 80% of listening is in the 70 dbu, and the rest in the 64 to 69 dbu contour. The HD signal at least matches the 64 dbu useful and used contour. On AM, the HD signal is often listenable beyond the "used and useful" contour of the analog signal. HD/IBOC causes adjacent-channel interference and has only 60% the coverage of analog. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... On Mar 5, 7:36?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Guerite" wrote in message ... and with only 60% the coverage of analog. Using 1/100th the power of the equivelent analog's signal carrier. Thus a power savings to the station. And, as discussed, on FM the "used" coverage area is the 64 dbu curve. Over 80% of listening is in the 70 dbu, and the rest in the 64 to 69 dbu contour. The HD signal at least matches the 64 dbu useful and used contour. On AM, the HD signal is often listenable beyond the "used and useful" contour of the analog signal. HD/IBOC causes adjacent-channel interference and has only 60% the coverage of analog. There is a difference between arbitrary signal contours and a usable signal. The FM HD coverage is about the same as the usable, useful FM analog signal, and in noisy markets, the AM HD in some cases extends beyond the usable analog contour, especially at night if the protected contour is a high value. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 5, 7:23�pm, "Guerite�" wrote:
wrote HD's channels are low-bitrate streams The station has a certain digital HD bandwidth that they can utilize as they wish. *They can allocate the full HD bandwidth to a single channel for the best sound. On FM that would result in a CD quality sound. Or they can divy up the bandwidth into 2 or 3 channels for lesser quality sound in each channel. of the same repetitive programming If a station chooses to transmit two (2) HD channels, and many do, the second HD channel's programming (HD2) is unique while the first HD channel is the superioir sounding digital version of the analog signal broadcast. causing adjacent-channel interference Digital is digital - there is no static, noise, interference or fading whatsoever on HD radio. and with only 60% the coverage of analog. Using 1/100th the power of the equivelent analog's signal carrier. *Thus a power savings to the station. HD/IBOC requires much more power than alaog broadcasting - you lose ! |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... On Mar 5, 7:23?pm, "Guerite?" wrote: wrote HD's channels are low-bitrate streams The station has a certain digital HD bandwidth that they can utilize as they wish. They can allocate the full HD bandwidth to a single channel for the best sound. On FM that would result in a CD quality sound. Or they can divy up the bandwidth into 2 or 3 channels for lesser quality sound in each channel. of the same repetitive programming If a station chooses to transmit two (2) HD channels, and many do, the second HD channel's programming (HD2) is unique while the first HD channel is the superioir sounding digital version of the analog signal broadcast. causing adjacent-channel interference Digital is digital - there is no static, noise, interference or fading whatsoever on HD radio. and with only 60% the coverage of analog. Using 1/100th the power of the equivelent analog's signal carrier. Thus a power savings to the station. HD/IBOC requires much more power than alaog broadcasting - you lose ! Nope, it is a fraction of the power. A 50 kw AM uses a 500 watt HD signal on the same frequency |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Eduardo wrote: wrote in message oups.com... On Mar 5, 7:23?pm, "Guerite?" wrote: wrote HD's channels are low-bitrate streams The station has a certain digital HD bandwidth that they can utilize as they wish. They can allocate the full HD bandwidth to a single channel for the best sound. On FM that would result in a CD quality sound. Or they can divy up the bandwidth into 2 or 3 channels for lesser quality sound in each channel. of the same repetitive programming If a station chooses to transmit two (2) HD channels, and many do, the second HD channel's programming (HD2) is unique while the first HD channel is the superioir sounding digital version of the analog signal broadcast. causing adjacent-channel interference Digital is digital - there is no static, noise, interference or fading whatsoever on HD radio. and with only 60% the coverage of analog. Using 1/100th the power of the equivelent analog's signal carrier. Thus a power savings to the station. HD/IBOC requires much more power than alaog broadcasting - you lose ! Nope, it is a fraction of the power. A 50 kw AM uses a 500 watt HD signal on the same frequency And pumps out 50kW of QRM! |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... On Mar 5, 7:23?pm, "Guerite?" wrote: wrote HD's channels are low-bitrate streams The station has a certain digital HD bandwidth that they can utilize as they wish. They can allocate the full HD bandwidth to a single channel for the best sound. On FM that would result in a CD quality sound. Or they can divy up the bandwidth into 2 or 3 channels for lesser quality sound in each channel. of the same repetitive programming If a station chooses to transmit two (2) HD channels, and many do, the second HD channel's programming (HD2) is unique while the first HD channel is the superioir sounding digital version of the analog signal broadcast. causing adjacent-channel interference Digital is digital - there is no static, noise, interference or fading whatsoever on HD radio. and with only 60% the coverage of analog. Using 1/100th the power of the equivelent analog's signal carrier. Thus a power savings to the station. HD/IBOC requires much more power than alaog broadcasting - you lose ! Nope, it is a fraction of the power. A 50 kw AM uses a 500 watt HD signal on the same frequency This is pure baloney. Same crapola the DRM crowd tried to pass off on the general public. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Telamon" wrote in message ... Nope, it is a fraction of the power. A 50 kw AM uses a 500 watt HD signal on the same frequency This is pure baloney. Same crapola the DRM crowd tried to pass off on the general public. Check the technical specs. We are installing a new Nautel RX 50, which does 50 kw analog and 500 watts digital on AM. In Band On Channel has 1/100th of the analog signal in the digital mode. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Universal radio shipping rates | Shortwave | |||
Internet Radio Station: "Radio Free Colorado" is now Ranked as a | Broadcasting | |||
Internet Radio Station "Radio Free Colorado" Continues to Grow! | Broadcasting | |||
Radio Free Colorado - A Successful New Internet Radio Station | Shortwave | |||
Kinky Radio seeks DJ's for BDSM Internet Radio 36716 | Broadcasting |