| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
March 6th 07, 08:17 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
Decision Has NO IMPACTon HD/Internet/XM/Sirius News and TalkStations
"Guerite©" wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Telamon wrote: In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: wrote in message ups.com... On Mar 5, 6:11?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... They'd better get some HD listeners before they do that, elsewise their listeners will abandon them. A low power, 9mm HD single chip decoder that uses 10% of the power of the current chipsets headlines Radio World this week. Using this chip, portables are now possible with long battery life and the price point comes way down due to component materials. This is the evolutionary development we were waiting for that will make receivers better and cheaper. HD Radios will never sell. Ah, Wal-Mart put the first HD radio on sale this week. The momentum is building, and will continue over the next several years. The only momentum I see building is the number of posts you make on the subject. It's because he's a shill! because he is on-topic! Nah, he's actually an info-mercial. dxAce Michigan USA |
|
#2
March 6th 07, 08:27 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Decision Has NO IMPACTon HD/Internet/XM/Sirius News and Talk...
I think that married woman in Texarkana,Texas is trying to run some kind
of competion with that divorced woman in Petal,Mississippi.I need to go pee. cuhulin (Petal woman is really from Miami) |
|
#3
March 8th 07, 10:13 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Decision Has NO IMPACTon HD/Internet/XM/Sirius News and Talk ...
On Mar 6, 1:27 pm, wrote:
..I need to go pee. cuhulin Be careful you don't get any on your balls. Sapper |
|
#4
March 7th 07, 03:02 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Decision Has NO IMPACTon HD/Internet/XM/Sirius News and Talk Stations
In article ,
dxAce wrote: "Guerite©" wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Telamon wrote: In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: wrote in message ups.com... On Mar 5, 6:11?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... They'd better get some HD listeners before they do that, elsewise their listeners will abandon them. A low power, 9mm HD single chip decoder that uses 10% of the power of the current chipsets headlines Radio World this week. Using this chip, portables are now possible with long battery life and the price point comes way down due to component materials. This is the evolutionary development we were waiting for that will make receivers better and cheaper. HD Radios will never sell. Ah, Wal-Mart put the first HD radio on sale this week. The momentum is building, and will continue over the next several years. The only momentum I see building is the number of posts you make on the subject. It's because he's a shill! because he is on-topic! Nah, he's actually an info-mercial. Finally, an answer that makes sense. DxAce broke the code. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
|
#5
March 7th 07, 03:32 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Decision Has NO IMPACTon HD/Internet/XM/Sirius News and Talk Stations
"Telamon" wrote in message ... Finally, an answer that makes sense. DxAce broke the code. Aren't you the guy who posted that HD carriers are _not_ only 1% of the analog signal strength? Continue posting false data... |
|
#6
March 7th 07, 04:02 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Decision Has NO IMPACTon HD/Internet/XM/Sirius News and Talk Stations
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... Finally, an answer that makes sense. DxAce broke the code. Aren't you the guy who posted that HD carriers are _not_ only 1% of the analog signal strength? Continue posting false data... No I'm not the person that posted that. Continue to fabricate. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
|
#7
March 7th 07, 04:04 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Decision Has NO IMPACTon HD/Internet/XM/Sirius News and Talk Stations
"Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... Finally, an answer that makes sense. DxAce broke the code. Aren't you the guy who posted that HD carriers are _not_ only 1% of the analog signal strength? Continue posting false data... No I'm not the person that posted that. Continue to fabricate. Nope... you said that was not true, and compared it again, irrelevantly, to DRM. |
|
#8
March 7th 07, 04:44 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Decision Has NO IMPACTon HD/Internet/XM/Sirius News and Talk Stations
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message . .. Finally, an answer that makes sense. DxAce broke the code. Aren't you the guy who posted that HD carriers are _not_ only 1% of the analog signal strength? Continue posting false data... No I'm not the person that posted that. Continue to fabricate. Nope... you said that was not true, and compared it again, irrelevantly, to DRM. What I stated is true. You are propagating that same BS about HD that was and is being propagated by the DRM consortium. It is the same argument about a digital modulation scheme being better than analog. It is complete BS. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
|
#9
March 7th 07, 04:51 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Decision Has NO IMPACTon HD/Internet/XM/Sirius News and Talk Stations
"Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message . .. Finally, an answer that makes sense. DxAce broke the code. Aren't you the guy who posted that HD carriers are _not_ only 1% of the analog signal strength? Continue posting false data... No I'm not the person that posted that. Continue to fabricate. Nope... you said that was not true, and compared it again, irrelevantly, to DRM. What I stated is true. You are propagating that same BS about HD that was and is being propagated by the DRM consortium. It is the same argument about a digital modulation scheme being better than analog. It is complete BS. All I said was that the digital carrier is 1% (or 1/100th) of the analog carrier power. You said such a statement did not pass the "smell test" even though it is part of the FCC authorization of HD. |
|
#10
March 7th 07, 04:06 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Decision Has NO IMPACTon HD/Internet/XM/Sirius News and Talk Stations
"Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... Finally, an answer that makes sense. DxAce broke the code. Aren't you the guy who posted that HD carriers are _not_ only 1% of the analog signal strength? Continue posting false data... No I'm not the person that posted that. Continue to fabricate. Here is your post, in response to my quantification of HD power levels... I said it was 1% of analog power and you said that did not pass your test. Care to retract? In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... Nope, it is a fraction of the power. A 50 kw AM uses a 500 watt HD signal on the same frequency This is pure baloney. Same crapola the DRM crowd tried to pass off on the general public. Check the technical specs. We are installing a new Nautel RX 50, which does 50 kw analog and 500 watts digital on AM. In Band On Channel has 1/100th of the analog signal in the digital mode. I have checked the specs. It does not even pass the smell test. Like I stated previously the DRM consortium tried the same hyperbole, which failed. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Universal radio shipping rates | Shortwave | |||
| Internet Radio Station: "Radio Free Colorado" is now Ranked as a | Broadcasting | |||
| Internet Radio Station "Radio Free Colorado" Continues to Grow! | Broadcasting | |||
| Radio Free Colorado - A Successful New Internet Radio Station | Shortwave | |||
| Kinky Radio seeks DJ's for BDSM Internet Radio 36716 | Broadcasting | |||
Hybrid Mode
