In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
.
..
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message

om.
..

Finally, an answer that makes sense. DxAce broke the code.

Aren't you the guy who posted that HD carriers are _not_ only 1% of
the
analog signal strength?

Continue posting false data...

No I'm not the person that posted that. Continue to fabricate.


Nope... you said that was not true, and compared it again, irrelevantly,
to
DRM.

What I stated is true. You are propagating that same BS about HD that
was and is being propagated by the DRM consortium. It is the same
argument about a digital modulation scheme being better than analog. It
is complete BS.

All I said was that the digital carrier is 1% (or 1/100th) of the analog
carrier power. You said such a statement did not pass the "smell test" even
though it is part of the FCC authorization of HD.

That's right David, you posted that the HD carrier is 1% of analog not
me. I'm glad you got that straight. Apology accepted.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California