In article ,
"Brenda Ann" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
.
..
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message

om.
..

Finally, an answer that makes sense. DxAce broke the code.

Aren't you the guy who posted that HD carriers are _not_ only 1% of
the
analog signal strength?

Continue posting false data...

No I'm not the person that posted that. Continue to fabricate.


Nope... you said that was not true, and compared it again, irrelevantly,
to
DRM.

What I stated is true. You are propagating that same BS about HD that
was and is being propagated by the DRM consortium. It is the same
argument about a digital modulation scheme being better than analog. It
is complete BS.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Let's talk for just a moment about that OTHER DRM.. Digital Rights
Management.. the one that is going to prevent you from recording digitally
from digital sources such as HD radio and DTV. That alone will keep me from
ever having either of those devices in my home. I'm sick and dog tired of
the government, RIAA, MPAA and other critters of their ilk micromanaging
what I do in my own home with devices I have paid for, and programming that
is paid for by advertisement to the masses. Way back when, the courts held
that there was such a thing as 'fair use'... now here in the 'digital age',
fair use has gone down the chute. Someone kindly tell me when the courts are
once again going to stand for the rights of the PEOPLE instead of the rights
of big business.

It is well known that a digital mode affords the broadcaster more
control over who can decode/demodulate the transmission and also what
the receiver can do with the decoded information.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California