|
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
"HFguy" wrote in message news:eJNLh.2004$zN.1893@trndny03... Fair enough but I guess you must see something to be gained by continuing to respond to the various abuses you get here. Is it really worth it? It is fun to see what the "other side" thinks, and it is very useful professionally in understanding both how to deal with contrary opinion and it's valuable to understand that things that seem quite clear inside an industry are not always viewed the same way outside. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... If you care to check, Radio Musical, Cia. Ltda, a limited responsibility corporation, was established in June of 1964 and I was the sole shareholder and the "agent" was Dr. Isaac Cevallos, my attorney. I am sure that the commercial section of the US Embassy / Quito can find this for you. Edweenie, you're full of ****! In other words, you are not going to check. You could, and you would find out the entire company was in my name. Seems as though you have stated in the past that it *was not* in your name.. Which would explain why you were merely the *General Manager*. I did not say that; I said the license was not in my name... the company that owned the license was. In fact, only a few hundred US radio stations out of 14 thousand are in the name of an individual licensee... all the rest are companies of some kind. How else would the general manager of a radio station do a business card? Many general managers are also owners of the licensee corporation, but they don't put that on their card. Keep dancing, little boy, keep dancing! You're hilarious. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... If you care to check, Radio Musical, Cia. Ltda, a limited responsibility corporation, was established in June of 1964 and I was the sole shareholder and the "agent" was Dr. Isaac Cevallos, my attorney. I am sure that the commercial section of the US Embassy / Quito can find this for you. Edweenie, you're full of ****! In other words, you are not going to check. You could, and you would find out the entire company was in my name. Seems as though you have stated in the past that it *was not* in your name.. Which would explain why you were merely the *General Manager*. I did not say that; I said the license was not in my name... the company that owned the license was. In fact, only a few hundred US radio stations out of 14 thousand are in the name of an individual licensee... all the rest are companies of some kind. How else would the general manager of a radio station do a business card? Many general managers are also owners of the licensee corporation, but they don't put that on their card. Edweenie, with an ego as big as yours, if you were the owner you'd certainly have put that on your business card and you'd certainly have signed the QSL's that way as well. Same thing with the 'Eduardo' shtik, if it were true, that's the way you would have signed things, especially being in Latin America. However, as you and I both know, you were not an owner, nor are you 'Eduardo'. Now go get your panties out of those knots. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
On Mar 17, 6:36 pm, "AM-HDisDead"
wrote: What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio ! http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148...&comments=true My hope is that people will grow sufficiently tired of all of these off topic posts that they'll develop renewed interest in having RRS moderated. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: How else would the general manager of a radio station do a business card? Many general managers are also owners of the licensee corporation, but they don't put that on their card. Edweenie, with an ego as big as yours, if you were the owner you'd certainly have put that on your business card and you'd certainly have signed the QSL's that way as well. Sorry, that is not the way it was done. Look at anyone's veries or QSL's (MW or SW) from the 60's from Ecuador and you will find that people like Gonzalo Maldonado (Atahualpa), Gerardo Brborich (RNE), Gustavo Herdoiza (Tarqui), Armando Rormero (Cristal), Voltaire Paladines (Atalaya), Eduardo Granja (Ecuatoirana), etc., etc. who were all also owners never signed as "propietario" but as general manager. In that society and culture, putting "owner" on a business card was the height of tackiness... something only Numa Pompilio Castro of Radio Cosmopolita would do.... In any case, you might drop a line to my partner at the only station I owned with a partner (Radio Carrousel 660 Guayaquil), Jaime Nebot Velasco and ask him who I am. He can currently be reached by addressing your letter, in Spanish, of course, to the Mayor of Guayaquil which is the position he occupies currently. Same thing with the 'Eduardo' shtik, if it were true, that's the way you would have signed things, especially being in Latin America. As mentioned before, I hav enot used that name except on such legal documents as require _all_ names and on newsgroups, ever. when I woened stations in Ecuador or managed stations and groups in Puerto Rico, I did not need to use extra names... having an Irish name in Latin America is not all that uncommon, as Bernard O'Higgins will testify (were he still alive). You think that having a name that ends in a vowel somehow makes a person seem to be something different? Non-Spanish names are profuse in Latin America, ranging from Fujimori to Fox to Menem to Stroessner, to name a few former presidents of several different countries. However, as you and I both know, you were not an owner, nor are you 'Eduardo'. Hey, even closer to home... talk to Larry Cervone, former head of Gates and then BE in Quincy... he sold me the original equipment for my first station... paid with travelers cheques in Quincy in June of1964... he loves the story of the 17 year old who was building a radio station. Or, look for my letter to the editor in Broadcasting in September, 1964 about establishing contacts with stations in other countries. Or any member of the International Broadcaster's Idea Bank in the 60's.... from Art Keller of EZ communications to Cary Simpson of the Intermountain Network in Pennsylvania, all of whom knew me "then" and knew what I did. Or Herb Levin of the 1020 Kendall, FL, station who was GM at WQA in Miami who helped me get my GM position in Puerto Rico in 1970 when things went bad in Ecuador. Nice try... I can name hundreds and hundreds of people who knew the stations, knew me and would know you are without basis in your claim. Go ahead... write to any of them... or to any broadcaster in Quito who was active in that period. Go for it. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: How else would the general manager of a radio station do a business card? Many general managers are also owners of the licensee corporation, but they don't put that on their card. Edweenie, with an ego as big as yours, if you were the owner you'd certainly have put that on your business card and you'd certainly have signed the QSL's that way as well. Sorry, that is not the way it was done. Look at anyone's veries or QSL's (MW or SW) from the 60's from Ecuador and you will find that people like Gonzalo Maldonado (Atahualpa), Gerardo Brborich (RNE), Gustavo Herdoiza (Tarqui), Armando Rormero (Cristal), Voltaire Paladines (Atalaya), Eduardo Granja (Ecuatoirana), etc., etc. who were all also owners never signed as "propietario" but as general manager. In that society and culture, putting "owner" on a business card was the height of tackiness... something only Numa Pompilio Castro of Radio Cosmopolita would do.... In any case, you might drop a line to my partner at the only station I owned with a partner (Radio Carrousel 660 Guayaquil), Jaime Nebot Velasco and ask him who I am. He can currently be reached by addressing your letter, in Spanish, of course, to the Mayor of Guayaquil which is the position he occupies currently. Same thing with the 'Eduardo' shtik, if it were true, that's the way you would have signed things, especially being in Latin America. As mentioned before, I hav enot used that name except on such legal documents as require _all_ names and on newsgroups, ever. when I woened stations in Ecuador or managed stations and groups in Puerto Rico, I did not need to use extra names... having an Irish name in Latin America is not all that uncommon, as Bernard O'Higgins will testify (were he still alive). You think that having a name that ends in a vowel somehow makes a person seem to be something different? Non-Spanish names are profuse in Latin America, ranging from Fujimori to Fox to Menem to Stroessner, to name a few former presidents of several different countries. However, as you and I both know, you were not an owner, nor are you 'Eduardo'. Hey, even closer to home... talk to Larry Cervone, former head of Gates and then BE in Quincy... he sold me the original equipment for my first station... paid with travelers cheques in Quincy in June of1964... he loves the story of the 17 year old who was building a radio station. Or, look for my letter to the editor in Broadcasting in September, 1964 about establishing contacts with stations in other countries. Or any member of the International Broadcaster's Idea Bank in the 60's.... from Art Keller of EZ communications to Cary Simpson of the Intermountain Network in Pennsylvania, all of whom knew me "then" and knew what I did. Or Herb Levin of the 1020 Kendall, FL, station who was GM at WQA in Miami who helped me get my GM position in Puerto Rico in 1970 when things went bad in Ecuador. Nice try... I can name hundreds and hundreds of people who knew the stations, knew me and would know you are without basis in your claim. Go ahead... write to any of them... or to any broadcaster in Quito who was active in that period. Go for it. Dance little boy, dance! You were not the *owner*. You're hilarious. dxAce Michigan USA |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
"dxAce" wrote in message ... Dance little boy, dance! You were not the *owner*. Whatever. Whether you believe or not really makes me no money, gives me no more nor no less recognition and does not affect the price of rice in China. think whatever you want. Have a ball. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
On Mar 20, 1:25 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"HFguy" wrote in message news:X_ILh.10198$el3.3366@trndny01... David Eduardo wrote: "HFguy" wrote in message news:vmILh.1689$zN.16@trndny03... At this point David, the question is why are you spending so much time on this group and others, defending HD radio and your personal life as well. You said a while ago that it doesn't take much time from your schedule to make all these responses but it's beginning to look like you must be compensated in some way to make it worth your time. There are just too many posts on this subject from someone that supposedly has more important responsibilities in the radio industry than arguing on a Usenet group. No one on this group is going to have any say in the outcome of HD radio, with the possible exception of someone participating in a listener survey. So why do you care? It's amusing, especially while doing things like sitting in airports, doing airchecks, etc. But you make one very good point... nobody here will make even a tiny difference in the success of HD except those working in the industry. I guess we can take your refusal to answer the compensation question as an indication that you are in some way compensated. It's clear that this is all a game for you but how about giving it a rest. It's absurd to even think that any radio company cares what goes on in a group with about 15 regular posters. In case that is too obtuse, no, I do not get compensated, I was, before working in radio, a radio groupie. I collected DJ autographs and verification letters and EKKO stamps and Jones Logs. Despite being in the business now for nearly 50 years, I am still, first, a radio groupie. Heck, last week I bought a sheetfed duplex scanner to put my Radex and Whites and Stevenson's logs on my website... the first 15 or so are already there, spanning the late 20's to the late 40's. I believe in radio, and believe it still has lots of life. But there will be fundamental technical changes for it to survive. Some may not be DX friendly, and some may open up new DX opportunities.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Actually, on second thought, it's not absurd to think that radio companies care about what goes on in a group with about 15 regular posters. So nevermind. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
On Mar 20, 1:27 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "HFguy" wrote in message news:vmILh.1689$zN.16@trndny03... At this point David, the question is why are you spending so much time on this group and others, defending HD radio and your personal life as well. You said a while ago that it doesn't take much time from your schedule to make all these responses but it's beginning to look like you must be compensated in some way to make it worth your time. There are just too many posts on this subject from someone that supposedly has more important responsibilities in the radio industry than arguing on a Usenet group. No one on this group is going to have any say in the outcome of HD radio, with the possible exception of someone participating in a listener survey. So why do you care? It's amusing, especially while doing things like sitting in airports, doing airchecks, etc. But you make one very good point... nobody here will make even a tiny difference in the success of HD except those working in the industry. Yes we are very amused at your BS. Be sure to show these posts to your circle of imaginary insiders so they can laugh at us and continue to imagine seeing and hearing that imaginary ASIC at working in a prototype unit. And how many HD stations do you work with? And how many markets do you get monthly and weekly Arbitron data for? You don't know a thing about the radio industry, as you have proven over and over again, and the worst thing is that you don't care to learn. Having $5 k for an expensive radio is not a sign of knowledge, just of extravagance.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Looking back at your post again, it seems to me that you actually know a great deal about the radio industry. So, please disregard my earlier criticism. Sorry. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 02:40:40 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote: "David" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:01:07 GMT, "David Eduardo" wrote: In other words, most people under a certain age will not listen to AM no matter what is on it because the sound sucks and there is so much noise and interference. So why are most of the Radio Disney stations AM? ... Because AM stations are cheap and for a couple of million, they got about 40 of them. Practically nobody listens; it's still a cheap marketing tool for Disney, though. How many ''practically nobodies'' make an audience? |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
On Mar 20, 6:42 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message ... If you care to check, Radio Musical, Cia. Ltda, a limited responsibility corporation, was established in June of 1964 and I was the sole shareholder and the "agent" was Dr. Isaac Cevallos, my attorney. I am sure that the commercial section of the US Embassy / Quito can find this for you. Edweenie, you're full of ****! In other words, you are not going to check. You could, and you would find out the entire company was in my name. Seems as though you have stated in the past that it *was not* in your name.. Which would explain why you were merely the *General Manager*. I did not say that; I said the license was not in my name... the company that owned the license was. In fact, only a few hundred US radio stations out of 14 thousand are in the name of an individual licensee... all the rest are companies of some kind. How else would the general manager of a radio station do a business card? Many general managers are also owners of the licensee corporation, but they don't put that on their card.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Okay okay....so I stretched the truth a little. It's not like I'm the only one. Everyone lies from time to time. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 03:16:43 GMT, HFguy wrote:
At this point David, the question is why are you spending so much time on this group and others, defending HD radio and your personal life as well. You said a while ago that it doesn't take much time from your schedule to make all these responses but it's beginning to look like you must be compensated in some way to make it worth your time. There are just too many posts on this subject from someone that supposedly has more important responsibilities in the radio industry than arguing on a Usenet group. No one on this group is going to have any say in the outcome of HD radio, with the possible exception of someone participating in a listener survey. So why do you care? And why did 10-Q stop broadcasting IBOC? |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
On Mar 20, 8:20 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: How else would the general manager of a radio station do a business card? Many general managers are also owners of the licensee corporation, but they don't put that on their card. Edweenie, with an ego as big as yours, if you were the owner you'd certainly have put that on your business card and you'd certainly have signed the QSL's that way as well. Sorry, that is not the way it was done. Look at anyone's veries or QSL's (MW or SW) from the 60's from Ecuador and you will find that people like Gonzalo Maldonado (Atahualpa), Gerardo Brborich (RNE), Gustavo Herdoiza (Tarqui), Armando Rormero (Cristal), Voltaire Paladines (Atalaya), Eduardo Granja (Ecuatoirana), etc., etc. who were all also owners never signed as "propietario" but as general manager. In that society and culture, putting "owner" on a business card was the height of tackiness... something only Numa Pompilio Castro of Radio Cosmopolita would do.... Actually, I think I misread your post the first time. That is the way it was done. You're right. In any case, you might drop a line to my partner at the only station I owned with a partner (Radio Carrousel 660 Guayaquil), Jaime Nebot Velasco and ask him who I am. He can currently be reached by addressing your letter, in Spanish, of course, to the Mayor of Guayaquil which is the position he occupies currently. I just remembered that Jaime is on vacation right now. Sorry. Same thing with the 'Eduardo' shtik, if it were true, that's the way you would have signed things, especially being in Latin America. As mentioned before, I hav enot used that name except on such legal documents as require _all_ names and on newsgroups, ever. when I woened stations in Ecuador or managed stations and groups in Puerto Rico, I did not need to use extra names... having an Irish name in Latin America is not all that uncommon, as Bernard O'Higgins will testify (were he still alive). You think that having a name that ends in a vowel somehow makes a person seem to be something different? Non-Spanish names are profuse in Latin America, ranging from Fujimori to Fox to Menem to Stroessner, to name a few former presidents of several different countries. Oh all right for Christ's sake. So I try to spic it up a little to promote my career. There are worse sins! However, as you and I both know, you were not an owner, nor are you 'Eduardo'. Hey, even closer to home... talk to Larry Cervone, former head of Gates and then BE in Quincy... he sold me the original equipment for my first station... paid with travelers cheques in Quincy in June of1964... he loves the story of the 17 year old who was building a radio station. Or, look for my letter to the editor in Broadcasting in September, 1964 about establishing contacts with stations in other countries. Or any member of the International Broadcaster's Idea Bank in the 60's.... from Art Keller of EZ communications to Cary Simpson of the Intermountain Network in Pennsylvania, all of whom knew me "then" and knew what I did. Or Herb Levin of the 1020 Kendall, FL, station who was GM at WQA in Miami who helped me get my GM position in Puerto Rico in 1970 when things went bad in Ecuador. Nice try... I can name hundreds and hundreds of people who knew the stations, knew me and would know you are without basis in your claim. Go ahead... write to any of them... or to any broadcaster in Quito who was active in that period. Go for it. For that matter, you can contact any broadcaster in the depths of Siberia and they'll tell you....they''ll tell you! |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
On Mar 20, 8:31 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message ... Dance little boy, dance! You were not the *owner*. Whatever. Whether you believe or not really makes me no money, gives me no more nor no less recognition and does not affect the price of rice in China. think whatever you want. Have a ball. In all seriousness, dxAce, you have to remember where I've worked. My career depended on my being able to pass for a beaner. So criticize all you like...a man's gotta put bread on the table. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
"David" wrote in message ... On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 02:40:40 GMT, "David Eduardo" wrote: "David" wrote in message . .. On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:01:07 GMT, "David Eduardo" wrote: In other words, most people under a certain age will not listen to AM no matter what is on it because the sound sucks and there is so much noise and interference. So why are most of the Radio Disney stations AM? ... Because AM stations are cheap and for a couple of million, they got about 40 of them. Practically nobody listens; it's still a cheap marketing tool for Disney, though. How many ''practically nobodies'' make an audience? In mIn most markets, the Disney stations do not meet "Minimum Reporting standards" because it is so low; MRS means that the listening level is so low as to be statistically unreliable. And, in the science of statistics, that means "undetectable" and "non-existent.2 |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
On Mar 20, 1:27 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "HFguy" wrote in message news:vmILh.1689$zN.16@trndny03... At this point David, the question is why are you spending so much time on this group and others, defending HD radio and your personal life as well. You said a while ago that it doesn't take much time from your schedule to make all these responses but it's beginning to look like you must be compensated in some way to make it worth your time. There are just too many posts on this subject from someone that supposedly has more important responsibilities in the radio industry than arguing on a Usenet group. No one on this group is going to have any say in the outcome of HD radio, with the possible exception of someone participating in a listener survey. So why do you care? It's amusing, especially while doing things like sitting in airports, doing airchecks, etc. But you make one very good point... nobody here will make even a tiny difference in the success of HD except those working in the industry. Yes we are very amused at your BS. Be sure to show these posts to your circle of imaginary insiders so they can laugh at us and continue to imagine seeing and hearing that imaginary ASIC at working in a prototype unit. And how many HD stations do you work with? And how many markets do you get monthly and weekly Arbitron data for? You don't know a thing about the radio industry, as you have proven over and over again, and the worst thing is that you don't care to learn. Having $5 k for an expensive radio is not a sign of knowledge, just of extravagance.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Actually, I take that back. You appear to know a great deal about the radio industry. I think I was confusing you with someone else. Sorry. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
"David" wrote in message ... On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 03:16:43 GMT, HFguy wrote: And why did 10-Q stop broadcasting IBOC? There is no station called "10-Q." KTNQ is called "10-20 AM" Ten-Q as a name has not been used for 11 years. And the HD is off while we put in a brand new Nautel RX-50, change some of the common point components and the do some tower work at a total cost of over a quarter million dollars. The new gear is in place and being connected where the 10 kw aux used to be. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
On Mar 20, 5:22 am, HFguy wrote:
David Eduardo wrote: "HFguy" wrote in message news:X_ILh.10198$el3.3366@trndny01... David Eduardo wrote: "HFguy" wrote in message news:vmILh.1689$zN.16@trndny03... At this point David, the question is why are you spending so much time on this group and others, defending HD radio and your personal life as well. You said a while ago that it doesn't take much time from your schedule to make all these responses but it's beginning to look like you must be compensated in some way to make it worth your time. There are just too many posts on this subject from someone that supposedly has more important responsibilities in the radio industry than arguing on a Usenet group. No one on this group is going to have any say in the outcome of HD radio, with the possible exception of someone participating in a listener survey. So why do you care? It's amusing, especially while doing things like sitting in airports, doing airchecks, etc. But you make one very good point... nobody here will make even a tiny difference in the success of HD except those working in the industry. I guess we can take your refusal to answer the compensation question as an indication that you are in some way compensated. It's clear that this is all a game for you but how about giving it a rest. It's absurd to even think that any radio company cares what goes on in a group with about 15 regular posters. In case that is too obtuse, no, I do not get compensated, I was, before working in radio, a radio groupie. I collected DJ autographs and verification letters and EKKO stamps and Jones Logs. Despite being in the business now for nearly 50 years, I am still, first, a radio groupie. Heck, last week I bought a sheetfed duplex scanner to put my Radex and Whites and Stevenson's logs on my website... the first 15 or so are already there, spanning the late 20's to the late 40's. I believe in radio, and believe it still has lots of life. But there will be fundamental technical changes for it to survive. Some may not be DX friendly, and some may open up new DX opportunities. Fair enough but I guess you must see something to be gained by continuing to respond to the various abuses you get here. Is it really worth it?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'm a troll, and I doubt that I'm surprising anyone by admitting it. I don't know why I enjoy trolling newsgroups. Maybe my emotional development was stunted...who knows? |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
On Mar 20, 6:42 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message ... If you care to check, Radio Musical, Cia. Ltda, a limited responsibility corporation, was established in June of 1964 and I was the sole shareholder and the "agent" was Dr. Isaac Cevallos, my attorney. I am sure that the commercial section of the US Embassy / Quito can find this for you. Edweenie, you're full of ****! In other words, you are not going to check. You could, and you would find out the entire company was in my name. Seems as though you have stated in the past that it *was not* in your name.. Which would explain why you were merely the *General Manager*. I did not say that; I said the license was not in my name... the company that owned the license was. In fact, only a few hundred US radio stations out of 14 thousand are in the name of an individual licensee... all the rest are companies of some kind. How else would the general manager of a radio station do a business card? Many general managers are also owners of the licensee corporation, but they don't put that on their card.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sorry, I misspoke. The license was indeed in my name, which is almost always the way it works. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
On Mar 20, 1:23 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"David" wrote in message ... On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 02:40:40 GMT, "David Eduardo" wrote: "David" wrote in message . .. On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:01:07 GMT, "David Eduardo" wrote: In other words, most people under a certain age will not listen to AM no matter what is on it because the sound sucks and there is so much noise and interference. So why are most of the Radio Disney stations AM? ... Because AM stations are cheap and for a couple of million, they got about 40 of them. Practically nobody listens; it's still a cheap marketing tool for Disney, though. How many ''practically nobodies'' make an audience? In mIn most markets, the Disney stations do not meet "Minimum Reporting standards" because it is so low; MRS means that the listening level is so low as to be statistically unreliable. And, in the science of statistics, that means "undetectable" and "non-existent.2- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sorry guys, I was confused. Disney stations do meet the minimum reporting standards. It's what I get for trying to type and talk on the phone at the same time! |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
On Mar 20, 1:29 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"David" wrote in message ... On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 03:16:43 GMT, HFguy wrote: And why did 10-Q stop broadcasting IBOC? There is no station called "10-Q." KTNQ is called "10-20 AM" Ten-Q as a name has not been used for 11 years. And the HD is off while we put in a brand new Nautel RX-50, change some of the common point components and the do some tower work at a total cost of over a quarter million dollars. The new gear is in place and being connected where the 10 kw aux used to be. No, wait a minute. 10-Q...now I know the station you mean. Sorry...I'm a little slow on the uptake today. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... He is not arguing. In order to argue a point one has to provide information supporting one's position. This information must support one's position in a logical way or it does not sway anyone else's thinking. He can not prove that his arguments are valid. He falls back to a position of having "special knowledge" that no one else can verify. Nearly everyone in commercial radio has access, for example, to Arbitron data. However, it is copyright and costs... as an example... as much as $2 million a year to an LA station cluster to subscribe... and can not be given out freely. So that is the sort of data that I have and you don't. I also have access to all kinds of proprietary radio research that you can never get, either. Some guys at Coke have access to the formula for the soft drink, but you don't... The world is filled with special knowledge. In the case of radio, you have none of it. Your choice is to believe those who do have access, or to pound sand. Apparently you like the beach better than the truth. I like the beach better than the BS you dish out. This not the only instance of "special knowledge" you have demonstrated and is a fallback position anytime someone tries to pin you down on a specific that you continually pontificate on the news group. I generally give people the benefit of the doubt but you have far gone far beyond reasonable doubt my fabricating friend. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "HFguy" wrote in message news:vmILh.1689$zN.16@trndny03... At this point David, the question is why are you spending so much time on this group and others, defending HD radio and your personal life as well. You said a while ago that it doesn't take much time from your schedule to make all these responses but it's beginning to look like you must be compensated in some way to make it worth your time. There are just too many posts on this subject from someone that supposedly has more important responsibilities in the radio industry than arguing on a Usenet group. No one on this group is going to have any say in the outcome of HD radio, with the possible exception of someone participating in a listener survey. So why do you care? It's amusing, especially while doing things like sitting in airports, doing airchecks, etc. But you make one very good point... nobody here will make even a tiny difference in the success of HD except those working in the industry. Yes we are very amused at your BS. Be sure to show these posts to your circle of imaginary insiders so they can laugh at us and continue to imagine seeing and hearing that imaginary ASIC at working in a prototype unit. And how many HD stations do you work with? And how many markets do you get monthly and weekly Arbitron data for? You don't know a thing about the radio industry, as you have proven over and over again, and the worst thing is that you don't care to learn. Having $5 k for an expensive radio is not a sign of knowledge, just of extravagance. Not extravagance but interest in radio. Something you would not understand. I'm certainly not a commercial industry insider but I know the technical aspects of what you continually pontificate on and it is evident that you just spout BS. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
In article . com,
"David Eduardo" wrote: On Mar 20, 1:27 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message .. . In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "HFguy" wrote in message news:vmILh.1689$zN.16@trndny03... At this point David, the question is why are you spending so much time on this group and others, defending HD radio and your personal life as well. You said a while ago that it doesn't take much time from your schedule to make all these responses but it's beginning to look like you must be compensated in some way to make it worth your time. There are just too many posts on this subject from someone that supposedly has more important responsibilities in the radio industry than arguing on a Usenet group. No one on this group is going to have any say in the outcome of HD radio, with the possible exception of someone participating in a listener survey. So why do you care? It's amusing, especially while doing things like sitting in airports, doing airchecks, etc. But you make one very good point... nobody here will make even a tiny difference in the success of HD except those working in the industry. Yes we are very amused at your BS. Be sure to show these posts to your circle of imaginary insiders so they can laugh at us and continue to imagine seeing and hearing that imaginary ASIC at working in a prototype unit. And how many HD stations do you work with? And how many markets do you get monthly and weekly Arbitron data for? You don't know a thing about the radio industry, as you have proven over and over again, and the worst thing is that you don't care to learn. Having $5 k for an expensive radio is not a sign of knowledge, just of extravagance.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Looking back at your post again, it seems to me that you actually know a great deal about the radio industry. So, please disregard my earlier criticism. Sorry. The commercial aspects of AM radio? Nope. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote: "HFguy" wrote in message news:X_ILh.10198$el3.3366@trndny01... David Eduardo wrote: "HFguy" wrote in message news:vmILh.1689$zN.16@trndny03... At this point David, the question is why are you spending so much time on this group and others, defending HD radio and your personal life as well. You said a while ago that it doesn't take much time from your schedule to make all these responses but it's beginning to look like you must be compensated in some way to make it worth your time. There are just too many posts on this subject from someone that supposedly has more important responsibilities in the radio industry than arguing on a Usenet group. No one on this group is going to have any say in the outcome of HD radio, with the possible exception of someone participating in a listener survey. So why do you care? It's amusing, especially while doing things like sitting in airports, doing airchecks, etc. But you make one very good point... nobody here will make even a tiny difference in the success of HD except those working in the industry. I guess we can take your refusal to answer the compensation question as an indication that you are in some way compensated. It's clear that this is all a game for you but how about giving it a rest. It's absurd to even think that any radio company cares what goes on in a group with about 15 regular posters. In case that is too obtuse, no, I do not get compensated, You think that only 15 people read this news group you are demonstrating ignorance on yet another subject. I was, before working in radio, a radio groupie. I collected DJ autographs and verification letters and EKKO stamps and Jones Logs. Despite being in the business now for nearly 50 years, I am still, first, a radio groupie. Heck, last week I bought a sheetfed duplex scanner to put my Radex and Whites and Stevenson's logs on my website... the first 15 or so are already there, spanning the late 20's to the late 40's. I believe in radio, and believe it still has lots of life. But there will be fundamental technical changes for it to survive. Some may not be DX friendly, and some may open up new DX opportunities. Oh how convincing. Not. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
In article ,
dxAce wrote: HFguy wrote: David Eduardo wrote: "HFguy" wrote in message news:X_ILh.10198$el3.3366@trndny01... David Eduardo wrote: "HFguy" wrote in message news:vmILh.1689$zN.16@trndny03... At this point David, the question is why are you spending so much time on this group and others, defending HD radio and your personal life as well. You said a while ago that it doesn't take much time from your schedule to make all these responses but it's beginning to look like you must be compensated in some way to make it worth your time. There are just too many posts on this subject from someone that supposedly has more important responsibilities in the radio industry than arguing on a Usenet group. No one on this group is going to have any say in the outcome of HD radio, with the possible exception of someone participating in a listener survey. So why do you care? It's amusing, especially while doing things like sitting in airports, doing airchecks, etc. But you make one very good point... nobody here will make even a tiny difference in the success of HD except those working in the industry. I guess we can take your refusal to answer the compensation question as an indication that you are in some way compensated. It's clear that this is all a game for you but how about giving it a rest. It's absurd to even think that any radio company cares what goes on in a group with about 15 regular posters. In case that is too obtuse, no, I do not get compensated, I was, before working in radio, a radio groupie. I collected DJ autographs and verification letters and EKKO stamps and Jones Logs. Despite being in the business now for nearly 50 years, I am still, first, a radio groupie. Heck, last week I bought a sheetfed duplex scanner to put my Radex and Whites and Stevenson's logs on my website... the first 15 or so are already there, spanning the late 20's to the late 40's. I believe in radio, and believe it still has lots of life. But there will be fundamental technical changes for it to survive. Some may not be DX friendly, and some may open up new DX opportunities. Fair enough but I guess you must see something to be gained by continuing to respond to the various abuses you get here. Is it really worth it? For him it is. There are cracks appearing in his fantasy world and he has to keep up the repairs elsewise it will surely crumble. Already blown it as far as I'm concerned. This guys a poseur and a fake. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote: "HFguy" wrote in message news:eJNLh.2004$zN.1893@trndny03... Fair enough but I guess you must see something to be gained by continuing to respond to the various abuses you get here. Is it really worth it? It is fun to see what the "other side" thinks, and it is very useful professionally in understanding both how to deal with contrary opinion and it's valuable to understand that things that seem quite clear inside an industry are not always viewed the same way outside. Unconvincing. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote: "David" wrote in message ... On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 02:40:40 GMT, "David Eduardo" wrote: "David" wrote in message . .. On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:01:07 GMT, "David Eduardo" wrote: In other words, most people under a certain age will not listen to AM no matter what is on it because the sound sucks and there is so much noise and interference. So why are most of the Radio Disney stations AM? ... Because AM stations are cheap and for a couple of million, they got about 40 of them. Practically nobody listens; it's still a cheap marketing tool for Disney, though. How many ''practically nobodies'' make an audience? In mIn most markets, the Disney stations do not meet "Minimum Reporting standards" because it is so low; MRS means that the listening level is so low as to be statistically unreliable. And, in the science of statistics, that means "undetectable" and "non-existent.2 Well your posts don't meet the minimum believability tests. The guy forging your handle makes more sense than you do. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
On Mar 20, 10:29 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message ... In article . com, "David Eduardo" wrote: Looking back at your post again, it seems to me that you actually know a great deal about the radio industry. So, please disregard my earlier criticism. Sorry. The commercial aspects of AM radio? Nope. dgleason551 is not my account. It is, from the style of writing, likely to be dxAss. Actually, wait a moment. I didn't realize I was posting from my dgleason551 account, but in fact I am. Sorry about this mistake. It's been a long day for me here. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
On Mar 20, 10:23 pm, Telamon
wrote: In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "David" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 02:40:40 GMT, "David Eduardo" wrote: "David" wrote in message . .. On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:01:07 GMT, "David Eduardo" wrote: In other words, most people under a certain age will not listen to AM no matter what is on it because the sound sucks and there is so much noise and interference. So why are most of the Radio Disney stations AM? ... Because AM stations are cheap and for a couple of million, they got about 40 of them. Practically nobody listens; it's still a cheap marketing tool for Disney, though. How many ''practically nobodies'' make an audience? In mIn most markets, the Disney stations do not meet "Minimum Reporting standards" because it is so low; MRS means that the listening level is so low as to be statistically unreliable. And, in the science of statistics, that means "undetectable" and "non-existent.2 Well your posts don't meet the minimum believability tests. The guy forging your handle makes more sense than you do. -- Telamon Ventura, California Perhaps, but I'll bet my collection of teenage boys' used underwear far exceeds anything he can imagine. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article . com, "David Eduardo" wrote: Looking back at your post again, it seems to me that you actually know a great deal about the radio industry. So, please disregard my earlier criticism. Sorry. The commercial aspects of AM radio? Nope. dgleason551 is not my account. It is, from the style of writing, likely to be dxAss. Get an online email account and then use it to create a google news account. Anyone can do this or use an open news server. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
On Mar 20, 10:30 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: It's absurd to even think that any radio company cares what goes on in a group with about 15 regular posters. In case that is too obtuse, no, I do not get compensated, You think that only 15 people read this news group you are demonstrating ignorance on yet another subject. I said "posters" and not readers. But I meant readers, so I guess I did after all make the mistake you're attributing to me. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: It's absurd to even think that any radio company cares what goes on in a group with about 15 regular posters. In case that is too obtuse, no, I do not get compensated, You think that only 15 people read this news group you are demonstrating ignorance on yet another subject. I said "posters" and not readers. According to google there are 93 recent authors. This is one of the most active Usenet news groups. In any news group there are many times more readers than authors. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
David Eduardo wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article . com, "David Eduardo" wrote: Looking back at your post again, it seems to me that you actually know a great deal about the radio industry. So, please disregard my earlier criticism. Sorry. The commercial aspects of AM radio? Nope. dgleason551 is not my account. It is, from the style of writing, likely to be dxAss. Sorry, 'tard boy. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
HFguy wrote: Steve wrote: My hope is that people will grow sufficiently tired of all of these off topic posts that they'll develop renewed interest in having RRS moderated. I'm very close to giving up on this group. The 'Eduardo' impostor may be the last straw. I don't necessarily agree with everything David says, but when someone has to steal his identity to make their point, they've lost the argument. Perhaps that the "point" is that this thread does not belong in rec.radio.shortwave in the first place. We've been spammed with this HD stuff for long enough. They now have their own group. Let them use it. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
On Mar 21, 7:45 am, wrote:
HFguy wrote: Steve wrote: My hope is that people will grow sufficiently tired of all of these off topic posts that they'll develop renewed interest in having RRS moderated. I'm very close to giving up on this group. The 'Eduardo' impostor may be the last straw. I don't necessarily agree with everything David says, but when someone has to steal his identity to make their point, they've lost the argument. Perhaps that the "point" is that this thread does not belong in rec.radio.shortwave in the first place. We've been spammed with this HD stuff for long enough. They now have their own group. Let them use it. Don't worry. It turns out there is no impostor. When I claimed there was an imposter, I was simply looking back at a post that I didn't remember making, but later it all came back to me. Everything is fine. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
Then go to RAOK (look it p,Random Acts Of Kindness,feel good news group)
I used to get in there about six years ago.Thing is though,they wanted everybody to post at least one (or more) feel good message (nothing wrong with that at all) thingys in the news group and sometimes I am not a feel good kind of a dude,at least not everyday,anyway. (You be happy now) cuhulin |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
Rock Onnnnnn,,,,, KSL,over there in Ootaw.
cuhulin |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
Donce littl darlin with a hole in the stockin,,, donce by the light of
the silverly Mooooonnnnnn,,,,,,, cuhulin |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
In article lR4Mh.14000$el3.2376@trndny01, HFguy
wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message .. . In article . com, "David Eduardo" wrote: Looking back at your post again, it seems to me that you actually know a great deal about the radio industry. So, please disregard my earlier criticism. Sorry. The commercial aspects of AM radio? Nope. dgleason551 is not my account. It is, from the style of writing, likely to be dxAss. Get an online email account and then use it to create a google news account. Anyone can do this or use an open news server. If you knew it was DxAce would you admitt it? Yes. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com