![]() |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
"HD Radio Fan" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote ... AM is fading away. It is used by older folks, mostly, and there are only largely successful stations in one format area: talk. Talk is now moving to FM, and when the transition is over, there will be no mass appeal format on AM and no younger listeners. ANALog AM listeners will disappear just like shortwave listeners - only faster. HD improves FM audio, adds a second program channel, and vastly improves AM Audio. Nearly every FM can benefit. Only a few AMs can, as only a few have decent signals. Like I said before; don't expect a Calipornia public school drop-out to understand any sense of logic. This, of course, is a lie. As are your facts on AM in genera. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
David Eduardo wrote: "HD Radio Fan" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote The same company started simulcasting KTAR (AM) on FM in Phoenix, and 6 months later, the news / talk format was only on FM. (That is what "slowly moving" means... a lengthy transition to get people used to the idea of finding the station on FM, not AM). Don't expect a Calipornia public school dropout to understand anything even remotely similiar to logic. Very funny. 1. I never went to school in Califonia. 2. I did not go to public school. And you did not move to Mexico when you were 13. 3. I dropped out of the Colegio Americano in Quito to put my own radio staiton on the air. 4. I was deans list for many semesters in college 10 years later when i did my university studies part time while working. 5. Logic involves analyzing facts and drawing conclusions. Ams moving to FM and becoming more successful indicates that more will do the same thing... that is logic. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
David Eduardo wrote: "HD Radio Fan" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote The same company started simulcasting KTAR (AM) on FM in Phoenix, and 6 months later, the news / talk format was only on FM. (That is what "slowly moving" means... a lengthy transition to get people used to the idea of finding the station on FM, not AM). Don't expect a Calipornia public school dropout to understand anything even remotely similiar to logic. Very funny. 1. I never went to school in Califonia. 2. I did not go to public school. 3. I dropped out of the Colegio Americano in Quito to put my own radio staiton on the air. Yeah, that station where your name is not on the ownership papers and where you signed QSL's as the 'General Manager'. Also signed as 'David F. Gleason'. Oh, that's right, 'Eduardo' didn't show up until c.2000. 4. I was deans list for many semesters in college 10 years later when i did my university studies part time while working. 5. Logic involves analyzing facts and drawing conclusions. It sure does! That's how I discovered that you're a phoney baloney fake! I analysed the facts and drew conclusions based upon those facts. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:31:32 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote: "David" wrote in message .. . On 18 Mar 2007 06:26:29 -0700, "AM-HDisDead" wrote: On Mar 18, 12:29?am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "AM-HDisDead" wrote in message oups.com... What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio ! The fact is that Bonneville is slowly moving KSL to FM anyway. No, they are just simulcasting - AM is going to stay. AM radio used to work real well, until the Reagan FCC screwed it up. The Reagan FCC did not do much of anything to AM. What did AM in was FM... anyone under 45 has grown up in the era where more listening went to FM than AM (currently 80% or more) and they are not used to AM, especially for music. That is why nearly nobody under 45 uses AM... it sounds bad, is noisy and unpleasant compared to FM, iPods, webcasts, CDs, etc. Content matters more than delivery system. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
On Mar 18, 1:01 pm, "AM-HDisDead"
wrote: On Mar 18, 3:48?pm, "HD Radio Fan" wrote: "David Eduardo" wrote in 6 stupid comments on a message board are not reality. LOL ! 19 comments - shows no one cares about HD Radio and everyone knows it is a ****ing joke: http://www.alexaholic.com/hdradio.co...om+xmradio.com And take a look at the HD Radio group that was just created via google: http://groups.google.com/group/hd-radio?hl=en It has so far received a whopping two posts, neither of which received so much as a single reply. Even I wouldn't have expected such numbing indifference to discussion of HD radio. Furthermore, posts to RRS about HD radio aren't even being cross posted to the HD Radio group, which makes me suspect that the posts to RRS are just troll attempts and nothing more. Is ANYONE out there interested in HD radio? |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
On Mar 18, 11:43?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"AM-HDisDead" wrote in message oups.com... On Mar 18, 1:29?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "AM-HDisDead" wrote in message No, they are just simulcasting - AM is going to stay. ... for the moment. The same company started simulcasting KTAR (AM) on FM in Phoenix, and 6 months later, the news / talk format was only on FM. (That is what "slowly moving" means... a lengthy transition to get people used to the idea of finding the station on FM, not AM). Will never happen - KSL would lose too many listeners. Why do you say that? When WTOP in Washington; DC, moved 100% from AM to FM, the audience increased, especially in the sales friendly demographics under age 55. - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'll let you know, when all 4,500 AM stations go dark - terrestrial radio is dying and HD/IBLOCK will just accelerate its death. |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
"David Eduardo" wrote in message t... "HD Radio Fan" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote The same company started simulcasting KTAR (AM) on FM in Phoenix, and 6 months later, the news / talk format was only on FM. (That is what "slowly moving" means... a lengthy transition to get people used to the idea of finding the station on FM, not AM). Don't expect a Calipornia public school dropout to understand anything even remotely similiar to logic. Very funny. snip I was certainly NOT refering to you. In fact I find your posts most informative and an interesting insite into the business. Keep posting! |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "HD Radio Fan" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote The same company started simulcasting KTAR (AM) on FM in Phoenix, and 6 months later, the news / talk format was only on FM. (That is what "slowly moving" means... a lengthy transition to get people used to the idea of finding the station on FM, not AM). Don't expect a Calipornia public school dropout to understand anything even remotely similiar to logic. Very funny. 1. I never went to school in Califonia. 2. I did not go to public school. And you did not move to Mexico when you were 13. That again? You can not understand that a person can be in several different places in a year yet? 3. I dropped out of the Colegio Americano in Quito to put my own radio staiton on the air. 4. I was deans list for many semesters in college 10 years later when i did my university studies part time while working. 5. Logic involves analyzing facts and drawing conclusions. Ams moving to FM and becoming more successful indicates that more will do the same thing... that is logic. |
What KSL listeners had to say about ANALog Radio Idealogs!
"Steve" wrote And take a look at the HD Radio group that was just created via google: http://groups.google.com/group/ANALog-radio?hl=en Yeah, created by Socialist ANALog ideologs - bwaHAHAHA! |
What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
"David" wrote in message ... On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:31:32 GMT, "David Eduardo" wrote: "David" wrote in message . .. On 18 Mar 2007 06:26:29 -0700, "AM-HDisDead" wrote: On Mar 18, 12:29?am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "AM-HDisDead" wrote in message oups.com... What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio ! The fact is that Bonneville is slowly moving KSL to FM anyway. No, they are just simulcasting - AM is going to stay. AM radio used to work real well, until the Reagan FCC screwed it up. The Reagan FCC did not do much of anything to AM. What did AM in was FM... anyone under 45 has grown up in the era where more listening went to FM than AM (currently 80% or more) and they are not used to AM, especially for music. That is why nearly nobody under 45 uses AM... it sounds bad, is noisy and unpleasant compared to FM, iPods, webcasts, CDs, etc. Content matters more than delivery system. Both matter. When news talk format are moved to FM or new "traditional" n/t formats are put on FM, the 35-54 listening is much, much higher than an AM with the same or comparable programming will get. In other words, most people under a certain age will not listen to AM no matter what is on it because the sound sucks and there is so much noise and interference. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:20 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com