What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:
3. I dropped out of the Colegio Americano in Quito to put my own
radio
staiton on the air.

Yeah, that station where your name is not on the ownership papers and
where you
signed QSL's as the 'General Manager'. Also signed as 'David F.
Gleason'.

If you care to check, Radio Musical, Cia. Ltda, a limited responsibility
corporation, was established in June of 1964 and I was the sole
shareholder
and the "agent" was Dr. Isaac Cevallos, my attorney. I am sure that the
commercial section of the US Embassy / Quito can find this for you.

Edweenie, you're full of ****!

In other words, you are not going to check. You could, and you would find
out the entire company was in my name.

What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
 

For one week in April of 1993 (or was it 1992? I have a page from a
Monterey,Mexico,MacDonalds restaurant Monterey news paper here
somewhere) I visited Mexico.Reynosa,Matamoros,Rio Bravo,Gral Bravo,
(depending on which old Rand McNally road atlas you look at,Gral Bravo
might be called Dr.Bravo,China,or Gral Bravo.I like Gral Bravo,it's a
litlle bitty fiendly little town.Bienevidos Gral Bravo) Nueva Laredo,a
bunch of other towns too.I reckon I can say for one week (seven days) I
lived in Mexico.I didn't get sick on the food and water either,I know
how to handle those ''kinds of situations''
cuhulin

What KSL listeners had to say about ANALog Radio Idealogs!
 

In article .com,
"Steve" wrote:

On Mar 19, 2:00 pm, "HD Radio³" wrote:
"Steve" wrote

And take a look at the HD Radio group that was just created via
google:

http://groups.google.com/group/ANALog-radio?hl=en

Yeah, created by Socialist ANALog ideologs - bwaHAHAHA!

So long as it's there for discussion of HD radio, who cares who
created it? Besides, someone who finds this group in the google
directory isn't going to know (or care) who created it. Even so, there
appears to be very little interest. Maybe this will change, but thus
far it's amazing how little activity there's been in the HD radio
group.

You must have missed the ongoing infomercial. It is very entertaining.
Take the fact that it insists a prototype chip exists before it is
fabricated. Hilarity ensues.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
 

In article ,
"HD Radio³" wrote:

"David Eduardo" wrote in message
t...

"HD Radio Fan" wrote in message
...

"David Eduardo" wrote

The same company started simulcasting KTAR (AM) on FM in Phoenix, and 6
months later, the news / talk format was only on FM.

(That is what "slowly moving" means... a lengthy transition to get
people
used to the idea of finding the station on FM, not AM).


Don't expect a Calipornia public school dropout to understand anything
even
remotely similiar to logic.

Very funny.

snip

I was certainly NOT refering to you. In fact I find your posts most
informative and an interesting insite into the business.
Keep posting!

By all means keep on posting the BS. Very entertaining.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
 

On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:01:07 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:


In other words, most people under a certain age will not listen to AM no
matter what is on it because the sound sucks and there is so much noise and
interference.

So why are most of the Radio Disney stations AM?

What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
 

"David" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:01:07 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:


In other words, most people under a certain age will not listen to AM no
matter what is on it because the sound sucks and there is so much noise
and
interference.

So why are most of the Radio Disney stations AM?

.... Because AM stations are cheap and for a couple of million, they got
about 40 of them.

Practically nobody listens; it's still a cheap marketing tool for Disney,
though.

What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
 

David Eduardo wrote:

"HD Radio Fan" wrote in message
...

"David Eduardo" wrote

The same company started simulcasting KTAR (AM) on FM in Phoenix, and 6
months later, the news / talk format was only on FM.

(That is what "slowly moving" means... a lengthy transition to get people
used to the idea of finding the station on FM, not AM).


Don't expect a Calipornia public school dropout to understand anything
even
remotely similiar to logic.


Very funny.

1. I never went to school in Califonia.
2. I did not go to public school.
3. I dropped out of the Colegio Americano in Quito to put my own radio
staiton on the air.
4. I was deans list for many semesters in college 10 years later when i did
my university studies part time while working.
5. Logic involves analyzing facts and drawing conclusions. Ams moving to FM
and becoming more successful indicates that more will do the same thing...
that is logic.

At this point David, the question is why are you spending so much time
on this group and others, defending HD radio and your personal life as
well. You said a while ago that it doesn't take much time from your
schedule to make all these responses but it's beginning to look like you
must be compensated in some way to make it worth your time. There are
just too many posts on this subject from someone that supposedly has
more important responsibilities in the radio industry than arguing on a
Usenet group. No one on this group is going to have any say in the
outcome of HD radio, with the possible exception of someone
participating in a listener survey. So why do you care?

What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
 

"HFguy" wrote in message
news:vmILh.1689$zN.16@trndny03...

At this point David, the question is why are you spending so much time on
this group and others, defending HD radio and your personal life as well.
You said a while ago that it doesn't take much time from your schedule to
make all these responses but it's beginning to look like you must be
compensated in some way to make it worth your time. There are just too
many posts on this subject from someone that supposedly has more important
responsibilities in the radio industry than arguing on a Usenet group. No
one on this group is going to have any say in the outcome of HD radio,
with the possible exception of someone participating in a listener survey.
So why do you care?

It's amusing, especially while doing things like sitting in airports, doing
airchecks, etc.

But you make one very good point... nobody here will make even a tiny
difference in the success of HD except those working in the industry.

What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
 

In article vmILh.1689$zN.16@trndny03, HFguy
wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:

"HD Radio Fan" wrote in message
...

"David Eduardo" wrote

The same company started simulcasting KTAR (AM) on FM in Phoenix,
and 6 months later, the news / talk format was only on FM.

(That is what "slowly moving" means... a lengthy transition to get
people used to the idea of finding the station on FM, not AM).


Don't expect a Calipornia public school dropout to understand
anything even remotely similiar to logic.


Very funny.

1. I never went to school in Califonia. 2. I did not go to public
school. 3. I dropped out of the Colegio Americano in Quito to put
my own radio staiton on the air. 4. I was deans list for many
semesters in college 10 years later when i did my university
studies part time while working. 5. Logic involves analyzing facts
and drawing conclusions. Ams moving to FM and becoming more
successful indicates that more will do the same thing... that is
logic.

At this point David, the question is why are you spending so much
time on this group and others, defending HD radio and your personal
life as well. You said a while ago that it doesn't take much time
from your schedule to make all these responses but it's beginning to
look like you must be compensated in some way to make it worth your
time. There are just too many posts on this subject from someone that
supposedly has more important responsibilities in the radio industry
than arguing on a Usenet group. No one on this group is going to have
any say in the outcome of HD radio, with the possible exception of
someone participating in a listener survey.

He is not arguing. In order to argue a point one has to provide
information supporting one's position. This information must support
one's position in a logical way or it does not sway anyone else's
thinking. He can not prove that his arguments are valid. He falls back
to a position of having "special knowledge" that no one else can
verify.

So why do you care?

Good question.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

What KSL listeners had to say about HD Radio !
 

David Eduardo wrote:
"HFguy" wrote in message
news:vmILh.1689$zN.16@trndny03...

At this point David, the question is why are you spending so much time on
this group and others, defending HD radio and your personal life as well.
You said a while ago that it doesn't take much time from your schedule to
make all these responses but it's beginning to look like you must be
compensated in some way to make it worth your time. There are just too
many posts on this subject from someone that supposedly has more important
responsibilities in the radio industry than arguing on a Usenet group. No
one on this group is going to have any say in the outcome of HD radio,
with the possible exception of someone participating in a listener survey.
So why do you care?


It's amusing, especially while doing things like sitting in airports, doing
airchecks, etc.

But you make one very good point... nobody here will make even a tiny
difference in the success of HD except those working in the industry.

I guess we can take your refusal to answer the compensation question as
an indication that you are in some way compensated. It's clear that this
is all a game for you but how about giving it a rest.