On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 03:16:43 GMT, HFguy wrote:


At this point David, the question is why are you spending so much time
on this group and others, defending HD radio and your personal life as
well. You said a while ago that it doesn't take much time from your
schedule to make all these responses but it's beginning to look like you
must be compensated in some way to make it worth your time. There are
just too many posts on this subject from someone that supposedly has
more important responsibilities in the radio industry than arguing on a
Usenet group. No one on this group is going to have any say in the
outcome of HD radio, with the possible exception of someone
participating in a listener survey. So why do you care?

And why did 10-Q stop broadcasting IBOC?

"David" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 03:16:43 GMT, HFguy wrote:



And why did 10-Q stop broadcasting IBOC?

There is no station called "10-Q." KTNQ is called "10-20 AM" Ten-Q as a
name has not been used for 11 years.

And the HD is off while we put in a brand new Nautel RX-50, change some of
the common point components and the do some tower work at a total cost of
over a quarter million dollars. The new gear is in place and being connected
where the 10 kw aux used to be.

On Mar 20, 1:29 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"David" wrote in message

...

On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 03:16:43 GMT, HFguy wrote:

And why did 10-Q stop broadcasting IBOC?

There is no station called "10-Q." KTNQ is called "10-20 AM" Ten-Q as a
name has not been used for 11 years.

And the HD is off while we put in a brand new Nautel RX-50, change some of
the common point components and the do some tower work at a total cost of
over a quarter million dollars. The new gear is in place and being connected
where the 10 kw aux used to be.

No, wait a minute. 10-Q...now I know the station you mean. Sorry...I'm
a little slow on the uptake today.