Sounds of digital
 

Hi agng,
At one time I had bookmarked a site that had audio files of what various
digital modes sounded like as an aid to recognizing them on the air. Now I
can't find it. :-/ Anyone know of one?

Thanks!

Sounds of digital
 

"Bob Liesenfeld" wrote in message
...
Hi agng,
At one time I had bookmarked a site that had audio files of what various
digital modes sounded like as an aid to recognizing them on the air. Now
I can't find it. :-/ Anyone know of one?

Thanks!
This URL perhaps?
http://www.kb9ukd.com/digital/

CL

Sounds of digital
 

Here's Ibiquity testing in Cincinnati in 2001 on 1660kHz (heard in Central Ohio)

WQSN in Kalamazoo MI in the first few seconds, with Cincinnati phased away.

http://rhhardin.home.mindspring.com/wd2xam.ram
--
Ron Hardin


On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk.

Sounds of digital
 

"Ron Hardin" wrote in message
...
Here's Ibiquity testing in Cincinnati in 2001 on 1660kHz (heard in Central
Ohio)

WQSN in Kalamazoo MI in the first few seconds, with Cincinnati phased
away.


Keep in mind that the algorithm used then is nothing like the one in use now
to the extent that anything that old is irrelevant.

Sounds of digital
 

"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
...

"Ron Hardin" wrote in message
...
Here's Ibiquity testing in Cincinnati in 2001 on 1660kHz (heard in
Central Ohio)

WQSN in Kalamazoo MI in the first few seconds, with Cincinnati phased
away.

http://rhhardin.home.mindspring.com/wd2xam.ram
--

It's lovely... sounds exactly like one of the N. Korean jammers..

It's about 10 generations back in the codec and algorithm development.

Sounds of digital
 

David Eduardo wrote:
"Ron Hardin" wrote in message
...
Here's Ibiquity testing in Cincinnati in 2001 on 1660kHz (heard in Central
Ohio)

WQSN in Kalamazoo MI in the first few seconds, with Cincinnati phased
away.


Keep in mind that the algorithm used then is nothing like the one in use now
to the extent that anything that old is irrelevant.

Actually, on second thought, I take this back. It's surprising
sometimes how useful some of these old algorithms are.

Sounds of digital
 

David Eduardo wrote:
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
...

"Ron Hardin" wrote in message
...
Here's Ibiquity testing in Cincinnati in 2001 on 1660kHz (heard in
Central Ohio)

WQSN in Kalamazoo MI in the first few seconds, with Cincinnati phased
away.

http://rhhardin.home.mindspring.com/wd2xam.ram
--

It's lovely... sounds exactly like one of the N. Korean jammers..

It's about 10 generations back in the codec and algorithm development.



Well, maybe no 10 generations, but two generations at least.
Definitely one generation. I think.

Sounds of digital
 

"Caveat Lector" wrote in message
...

"Bob Liesenfeld" wrote in message
...
Hi agng,
At one time I had bookmarked a site that had audio files of what various
digital modes sounded like as an aid to recognizing them on the air. Now
I can't find it. :-/ Anyone know of one?

Thanks!
This URL perhaps?
http://www.kb9ukd.com/digital/

CL

Nice link. Thanks.

--
rb

Sounds of digital
 

On Mar 20, 10:58 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message

...
..



It's about 10 generations back in the codec and algorithm development.

Yeah, like you know what you are talking about. Not.

Since every station upgrades the software in the HD equipment each time
there is a codec or software change, we should know how many times it is
revised.

Actually I spoke too soon. Stations don't upgrade the software each
time there's a codec or software change, but they do it occasionally,
depending on what else is going on. It's hard to keep track of how
many times you done it, though. Who can keep track of these things?

Sounds of digital
 

In article .com,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
...

"Ron Hardin" wrote in message
...
Here's Ibiquity testing in Cincinnati in 2001 on 1660kHz (heard in
Central Ohio)

WQSN in Kalamazoo MI in the first few seconds, with Cincinnati phased
away.

http://rhhardin.home.mindspring.com/wd2xam.ram
--

It's lovely... sounds exactly like one of the N. Korean jammers..

It's about 10 generations back in the codec and algorithm development.



Well, maybe no 10 generations, but two generations at least.
Definitely one generation. I think.

And I take it YOU are the next generation.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California