Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Black wrote:
"Paul Zak" ) writes: Looks like it's a HUGE P.I.T.A. to start up a UseNet NG, so I am considering starting up a Yahoo moderated SWL NG instead. What's the interest level? Chances are pretty good such a thing already exists. One of the problems (but not the only one) with Yahoo "groups" or even the google-specific "groups" is that it's way too easy to create them. SO they get created on a whim, or for vanity reasons, or whatever, but creating a group doesn't actually mean anything happens in it. So you just crowd things up with another "group" that goes nowhere. (Which is why there is a whole process to create Usenet newsgroups, it's not to keep valid newsgroups from being created, it's there to make sure there is an actually good reason to create yet another newsgroup.) And since it's so easy to create those "groups", what you end up with is a very balkanized situation. INstead of one hierarchy that is easy to find and covers various areas, you get all kinds of "groups" all over the place, where they are less easy to find. And then it takes away from the existing discussion. It gets worse when the "group" doesn't even go very far. Michael What would it take to add a moderator to this group? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|