Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:40:18 -0400, dxAce
wrote: David Eduardo wrote: "Brenda Ann" wrote in message .. . Jesus H. Christ on a crutch, Gleason. Why don't you take your act on the road. Is there really a nead to be profane? It's "just" radio, not a discussion of the afterlife. For one thing, whether you are actually AWARE of this or not.. all us boomers are now OVER 50!!! This means that by far the largest segment of the population is now beyond your precious under-55 sales curve. WE COUNT. WE HAVE DISPOSABLE INCOME. WE BUY THINGS. LOTS OF THINGS. And we are damn tired of being minimalized, cubbyholed, catergorized and told we do not count. If all of us stopped buying advertised products, your precious sales curve would fall through the floor. And how am I, or radio, responsible for this? The fact is that advertisers tell their ad agencies what demographics to buy based on product design, the overall marketing plan, etc. There are paractically no ad campaigns directed at persons over 55, in fact. The reason has nothing to do with your analysis, which is in fact correct. It has to do with return on investment. Advertisers spend a great deal of money determining who buys the product and how much advertising it takes to get them to buy. Persons over 55 have more fixed buying patterns, so to get them to change costs more money... often more than the profit on the sale. So advertisers stay away from that group insofar as radio advertising is concerned. Since nearly none of radio's sales is dependent on 55+, hardly any stations program specifically to that group. In fact, when a station "gets too old" (meaning most of its listeners are over 55) the station will either change format (like many oldies stations have done int he last few years) or try to swing younger (like WFLA in Tampa calling every older woman part of "the blue hair club" to try to drive the 55 and over away) to imporve the salablity of the staitons ad time. Now, either try to see the big picture, beyond sales curves, 10dB contours and interference generating modulations schemes or PLEASE, take it someplace where people care to hear about it. You keep telling us we count for nothing, and then can't seem to fathom why we are all so damn ****ed off at you. The fact is, for commercial radio, people out of the metro area, over 55 and under 18 are not of any revenue value. Most stations don't go to the extreme mentioned above of trying to chase them away, but they don't help us pay the bills, either... any more than a 12 year old is useful to a tobacco shop. Yep, you are definitely stuck on stupid and locked on dumb! I enjoy DE's posts and have learned a great deal. I like your posts too DX - they're entertaining. Perfect combo. I'm glad you haven't called DE at work yet 'cause I like things the way they are. And, you really haven't figured him out yet either like you did Bryant. Matter-of-fact, I don't ever see you beating DE. tH |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
World Time Clocks Time Zones | Shortwave | |||
Wristwatch with UTC time and local time for SWL/Hams? | Shortwave | |||
24 hrs after daylight savings time, and no Seattle area radio station is transmitting the correct RDS time! | Shortwave | |||
// Bug alert : Radio Netherlands screen saver works on 'local time' not UTC time for computing daytime illumination of the sun // | Shortwave | |||
Mark Time SF Audio Awards | Broadcasting |