Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 30th 07, 03:29 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 321
Default HD Radio to charge consumers for content !

"If HD Radio Charges Consumers, Will It Be Considered Competition For
Satellite Radio?"

http://satellitestandard.blogspot.co...s-will-it.html

Notable quote:

"It is pretty much confirmed that HD Radio is going to charge
consumers for content. At what point is the FCC going to consider this
service competition for satellite radio? Ironically, free HD is not
considered competition, but paid service would be!"

Yup, it's a given - looks like the HD Radio Alliance has finally
realized that HD Radio is not going to be terrestrial radio's great
savior, so they have now taken a backseat to Satellite Radio,
forever. Great news !

  #2   Report Post  
Old March 30th 07, 03:57 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 726
Default HD Radio to charge consumers for content !


wrote in message
oups.com...
"If HD Radio Charges Consumers, Will It Be Considered Competition For
Satellite Radio?"

http://satellitestandard.blogspot.co...s-will-it.html

Notable quote:

"It is pretty much confirmed that HD Radio is going to charge
consumers for content. At what point is the FCC going to consider this
service competition for satellite radio? Ironically, free HD is not
considered competition, but paid service would be!"


It is not confirmed. In fact, no broadcaster I know has any intention of
doing this, as there is no model for charging for single channels or 3 to 4
unrealted channels when XM and Sirius have around 150 each.

Yup, it's a given - looks like the HD Radio Alliance has finally
realized that HD Radio is not going to be terrestrial radio's great
savior, so they have now taken a backseat to Satellite Radio,
forever. Great news !


There is no news of this whatsoever.


  #3   Report Post  
Old March 30th 07, 04:36 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 321
Default HD Radio to charge consumers for content !

On Mar 30, 1:57�pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...

"If HD Radio Charges Consumers, Will It Be Considered Competition For
Satellite Radio?"


http://satellitestandard.blogspot.co...io-charges-con...


Notable quote:


"It is pretty much confirmed that HD Radio is going to charge
consumers for content. At what point is the FCC going to consider this
service competition for satellite radio? Ironically, free HD is not
considered competition, but paid service would be!"


It is not confirmed. In fact, no broadcaster I know has any intention of
doing this, as there is no model for charging for single channels or 3 to 4
unrealted channels when XM and Sirius have around 150 each.



Yup, it's a given - looks like the HD Radio Alliance has finally
realized that HD Radio is not going to be terrestrial radio's great
savior, so they have now taken a backseat to Satellite Radio,
forever. *Great news !


There is no news of this whatsoever.


Yea, your are rigtht and RWOnline is wrong:

"Is Pay-for-Play HD Content on Horizon?"

"For more than a year, Ibiquity officials have been working with NDS,
a technology contractor, to develop a conditional access feature for
HD Radio. With field testing underway at a Florida public station,
some proponents hope conditional access is the next big feature for HD
Radio and think receivers that can handle the capability may be
available by the end of the year. Much must happen to make that a
reality."

http://www.rwonline.com/pages/s.0049/t.4028.html

It won't be up to individual broadcasters. As I said, HD Radio is
failing and this is the only way to attempt to recoup the huge losses,
due to the failed $500,000,000 HD Radio Alliance ad campaign. As
Ramsey said, "it will be a long, slow race to the bottom":

"Sirius, XM, and HD: Consumer interest reality check"

"While interest in satellite radio is diminishing, interest in HD
shows no signs of a pulse."

http://www.hear2.com/2007/02/sirius_xm_and_h.html



  #4   Report Post  
Old March 30th 07, 04:52 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 321
Default HD Radio to charge consumers for content !

On Mar 30, 1:57�pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...

"If HD Radio Charges Consumers, Will It Be Considered Competition For
Satellite Radio?"


http://satellitestandard.blogspot.co...io-charges-con...


Notable quote:


"It is pretty much confirmed that HD Radio is going to charge
consumers for content. At what point is the FCC going to consider this
service competition for satellite radio? Ironically, free HD is not
considered competition, but paid service would be!"


It is not confirmed. In fact, no broadcaster I know has any intention of
doing this, as there is no model for charging for single channels or 3 to 4
unrealted channels when XM and Sirius have around 150 each.



Yup, it's a given - looks like the HD Radio Alliance has finally
realized that HD Radio is not going to be terrestrial radio's great
savior, so they have now taken a backseat to Satellite Radio,
forever. *Great news !


There is no news of this whatsoever.


"WUSF Testing Conditional Access"

http://rwonline.com/pages/s.0049/t.4029.html

Notable quote:

"WUSF(FM) in Tampa, a long-time IBOC test bed and the first public
station to go IBOC, is the site of conditional access field testing
for HD Radio this spring. Tests were to begin March 19 and continue
through early May, according to Tom Dollenmayer, station manager for
radio and TV, WUSF Public Broadcasting."

Oh sorry, I seemed to have missed this article from Radio World Online.

  #5   Report Post  
Old March 30th 07, 06:05 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 726
Default HD Radio to charge consumers for content !


wrote in message
ups.com...
On Mar 30, 1:57?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...

"If HD Radio Charges Consumers, Will It Be Considered Competition For
Satellite Radio?"


http://satellitestandard.blogspot.co...io-charges-con...


Notable quote:


"It is pretty much confirmed that HD Radio is going to charge
consumers for content. At what point is the FCC going to consider this
service competition for satellite radio? Ironically, free HD is not
considered competition, but paid service would be!"


It is not confirmed. In fact, no broadcaster I know has any intention of
doing this, as there is no model for charging for single channels or 3 to
4
unrealted channels when XM and Sirius have around 150 each.



Yup, it's a given - looks like the HD Radio Alliance has finally
realized that HD Radio is not going to be terrestrial radio's great
savior, so they have now taken a backseat to Satellite Radio,
forever. Great news !


There is no news of this whatsoever.


"WUSF Testing Conditional Access"


This is a test by a public station, and there is so far no interest on the
part of commercial stations... the other issue is that there is absolutely
no economic model for charging for single channels at the local level.




  #6   Report Post  
Old March 30th 07, 07:19 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 321
Default HD Radio to charge consumers for content !

On Mar 30, 4:05?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...
On Mar 30, 1:57?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:





wrote in message


roups.com...


"If HD Radio Charges Consumers, Will It Be Considered Competition For
Satellite Radio?"


http://satellitestandard.blogspot.co...io-charges-con...


Notable quote:


"It is pretty much confirmed that HD Radio is going to charge
consumers for content. At what point is the FCC going to consider this
service competition for satellite radio? Ironically, free HD is not
considered competition, but paid service would be!"


It is not confirmed. In fact, no broadcaster I know has any intention of
doing this, as there is no model for charging for single channels or 3 to
4
unrealted channels when XM and Sirius have around 150 each.


Yup, it's a given - looks like the HD Radio Alliance has finally
realized that HD Radio is not going to be terrestrial radio's great
savior, so they have now taken a backseat to Satellite Radio,
forever. Great news !


There is no news of this whatsoever.
"WUSF Testing Conditional Access"


This is a test by a public station, and there is so far no interest on the
part of commercial stations... the other issue is that there is absolutely
no economic model for charging for single channels at the local level.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Doesn't matter what you say, because all of this is negative publicity
for HD Radio on a national level - LOL !!! BAWAHAAA !!!

  #7   Report Post  
Old March 30th 07, 07:19 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 321
Default MORE ANALog Ideolog Propaganda

On Mar 30, 5:25?pm, "HD Radio?" wrote:
AGENDA

On the Government's dole no girlfriend, no
wife, no kids, just a mouth full of profanity from America Online nearManassas, VA wrote in message

oups.com

"I have been researching/posting on this subject for a year, and have a
zillion links set up, and know exactly how and where to find information, to
counter little punks like you and David Edurado"

wrote in message

ups.com...



Good cocksucker, I ****ed you off.

wrote in message

oups.com...



Dumb **** Guerite HD/IBOC Shill


-- amazing how much time you have to waste in your small adolescent mind --


Glad, that you are impressed - is that all you got, buddy ?

  #9   Report Post  
Old March 30th 07, 08:00 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 321
Default MORE ANALog Ideolog Propaganda

On Mar 30, 5:25?pm, "HD Radio?" wrote:
AGENDA

On the Government's dole no girlfriend, no
wife, no kids, just a mouth full of profanity from America Online nearManassas, VA wrote in message

oups.com

"I have been researching/posting on this subject for a year, and have a
zillion links set up, and know exactly how and where to find information, to
counter little punks like you and David Edurado"

wrote in message

ups.com...



Good cocksucker, I ****ed you off.

wrote in message

oups.com...



Dumb **** Guerite HD/IBOC Shill


-- amazing how much time you have to waste in your small adolescent mind --


Personal attcks, such as this, just mean that I have won the HD Radio
War ! BAWAHAAAAA !

  #10   Report Post  
Old March 30th 07, 08:54 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 321
Default HD Radio to charge consumers for content !

On Mar 30, 4:05?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...
On Mar 30, 1:57?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:





wrote in message


roups.com...


"If HD Radio Charges Consumers, Will It Be Considered Competition For
Satellite Radio?"


http://satellitestandard.blogspot.co...io-charges-con...


Notable quote:


"It is pretty much confirmed that HD Radio is going to charge
consumers for content. At what point is the FCC going to consider this
service competition for satellite radio? Ironically, free HD is not
considered competition, but paid service would be!"


It is not confirmed. In fact, no broadcaster I know has any intention of
doing this, as there is no model for charging for single channels or 3 to
4
unrealted channels when XM and Sirius have around 150 each.


Yup, it's a given - looks like the HD Radio Alliance has finally
realized that HD Radio is not going to be terrestrial radio's great
savior, so they have now taken a backseat to Satellite Radio,
forever. Great news !


There is no news of this whatsoever.
"WUSF Testing Conditional Access"


This is a test by a public station, and there is so far no interest on the
part of commercial stations... the other issue is that there is absolutely
no economic model for charging for single channels at the local level.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -


Doesn't matter what you post on this, and radioinfo's little-read
message boards. What does matter, is negative publicity for HD Radio
on a national level, and that is exactly what is happening. Even if
you were right, which I highly-doubt, just the thought of HD Radio
charging for content puts it smack behind Satellite Radio, forever -
just having these articles on RWOnline is enough, and they will be
picked up and spread across the Web - you are, ****-out-of-luck !
BAWAHAAA !!!


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
radio content an_old_friend General 2 January 22nd 07 06:27 PM
BBC Radio 1 show - number station content. Simon Mason Shortwave 11 August 21st 05 09:52 PM
Enbridge/Consumers CTCSS TONE Steve St. Denis Scanner 2 November 11th 03 11:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017