Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 27, 12:00 pm, Bart Bailey wrote:
In ups.com posted on 27 May 2007 07:40:06 -0700, Steve wrote: Begin And despite all the bitching and moaning you hear about PC-based receivers, the real beauty of them is that the software is constantly improving and each major software upgrade is sort of like getting a new, better receiver. I find it fascinating. Is the modern DSP filtration getting good enough to overcome the noise from the computer they're connected to? -- Bart In my case computer noise has not been a problem. When it is a problem, the best thing to do would be to figure out where the noise is coming from and attack it direclty. The way I look at it, DSP is for kinds of noise that you can't simply get rid of. Ditto for the ANC-4 phasing unit that I sometimes use. They're like a last line of defense. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Modern Xtal Calibrator? | Boatanchors | |||
Modern/old powersupply-capacitors | Boatanchors | |||
Anyone know of a modern 60 Hz - 400 Hz converter? | Boatanchors | |||
DDS-4 modern features for DRAKE R4 & T4 | Equipment | |||
Is FM performance on modern PLL radios "rap" with a capital "C"? | Shortwave |