LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old June 11th 07, 04:12 PM posted to sci.electronics.basics,rec.video.desktop,rec.radio.shortwave,uk.radio.amateur,rec.arts.tv
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 2
Default I want to see SHF FM video signals.

The other thing is that the evolution of TV transmission also had to be
compatible with older sets. Hence for example the various ways of
transmitting chrominance alongside luminance. Or stereo sound alongside
mono.

"Bob Myers" wrote in message
...

"Radium" wrote in message
oups.com...

Why not carry the luminance-signal on FM and the audio-signal on AM?


See the previous post; it's basically a matter of the enormous bandwidth
requirements of FM (note that the standard "deviation" in FM *audio*
broadcast - a measure of how "wide" the overall signal will be - is +/-
75 kHz from the nominal carrier frequency, for a 15 kHz audio bandwidth.
The relationship between the transmitted signal bandwidth and the original
signal bandwidth in FM is not a simple one, but let's just leave it at the
point of noting that video signals are bandwidth hogs, and TV doesn't
even use regular-old-AM as a result of that. (The luminance signal is
actually sent via "vestigal sideband AM," one step removed from full
suppressed-carrier SSB.)

The audio is FM both to avoid the problems of interference bothering the
sound (just as in FM radio), AND to minimize the effects of the
video portions of the signal possibly interfering with the audio. A TV
channel, though, has relatively lots of room for audio.

Nonsense. The choices of AM and FM within the original analog
standard definitions were made for some very, very good reasons.
Digital television is a completely different beast, and is presently
broadcast using two very different modulation schemes - the
U.S. standard (ATSC) using 8-VSB, while the rest of the world
(mostly) will be using COFDM under the DVB-T standard.


Couldn't FSK [the digital equivalent of FM] be used for luminance [Y]
signal of the digital video?


FSK isn't exactly "the digital equivalent of FM" in the first place, and
the short form answer is no. Digital video is carried in a completely
difference manner, and there isn't exactly a readily-separable
luminance "signal" as such in the transmitted signal, at least not as
something you could identify on a scope as in analog TV - it's all just
bits, and it's all packetized.

Bob M.






 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VHF signals [email protected] Antenna 7 July 5th 06 11:40 AM
Strange signals on 3.665 Canadork Shortwave 0 November 18th 05 10:17 AM
Need early catalogs and manuals for early video equipment .... love the old reel to reel video machines and cameras! Will buy manuals, the artifacts ed sharpe Swap 0 August 28th 05 06:02 PM
for sale video security professional video stuff JPANIK0889 Swap 0 July 10th 03 09:32 AM
weird FM signals Antonio Broadcasting 5 July 7th 03 03:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017