| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
July 18th 07, 02:55 AM
posted to sci.electronics.basics,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,alt.cellular.cingular,alt.internet.wireless
|
|||
|
|||
How I would like to change the cell phone industry [was AM electromagnetic waves: 20 KHz modulation frequency on an astronomically-low carrier frequency]
In rec.radio.amateur.antenna John Navas wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 00:55:01 GMT, wrote in : In rec.radio.amateur.antenna John Navas wrote: On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 00:05:01 GMT, wrote in : In rec.radio.amateur.antenna John Navas wrote: On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:45:02 GMT, wrote in Cell phones already use frequencies in the 3 GHz region. False. 1.9 GHz is in the -region- of 3 GHz. False. It certainly is within about 20%. No radio engineer would agree. That should have been about 30%, but in any case, I am an engineer and there isn't a whole hell of a lot of anything different between 1.9 GHz and 3 GHz. What? Some trivial differences in path losses? Antennas a bit different in size by what, 4 mm unless I slipped a decimal point in my head? -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode
