MnMikew wrote:

And of course the Star & Sickle (Tribune) comes out with an editorial today
blaming the bridge collapse on our Republican Gov. Effing moonbats.

Heck, I'd heard earlier that it was the fault of Dick Cheney. He was down in the
bunker, playing with the joystick and accidentally zapped the bridge.

He had been trying to work up another Katrina class storm.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 15:23:49 -0500, "MnMikew"
wrote:

And of course the Star & Sickle (Tribune) comes out with an editorial
today
blaming the bridge collapse on our Republican Gov. Effing moonbats.

happened on his watch

I'll keep that in mind in case the Dopeocrats get elected.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


MnMikew wrote:

And of course the Star & Sickle (Tribune) comes out with an editorial
today
blaming the bridge collapse on our Republican Gov. Effing moonbats.

Heck, I'd heard earlier that it was the fault of Dick Cheney. He was down
in the
bunker, playing with the joystick and accidentally zapped the bridge.

He had been trying to work up another Katrina class storm.

I waiting for some idiot in the MSM to blame it on Bush somehow. Or global
warming. I know my drive to work is F'd for a few years.

MnMikew wrote:
And of course the Star & Sickle (Tribune) comes out with an editorial today
blaming the bridge collapse on our Republican Gov. Effing moonbats.



It'll be Bush's fault before the weekend.


Stories are beginning to surface about the history of this bridge,
and how it was never intended to be an arterial conduit in the first place.

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
MnMikew wrote:
And of course the Star & Sickle (Tribune) comes out with an editorial
today blaming the bridge collapse on our Republican Gov. Effing moonbats.

It'll be Bush's fault before the weekend.


Stories are beginning to surface about the history of this bridge, and
how it was never intended to be an arterial conduit in the first place.

Yup. 40 years old and weak. Not good. Even though it was built in 1967 it
will still be Bushs fault. :-)

MnMikew wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
MnMikew wrote:
And of course the Star & Sickle (Tribune) comes out with an editorial
today blaming the bridge collapse on our Republican Gov. Effing moonbats.

It'll be Bush's fault before the weekend.


Stories are beginning to surface about the history of this bridge, and
how it was never intended to be an arterial conduit in the first place.

Yup. 40 years old and weak. Not good. Even though it was built in 1967 it
will still be Bushs fault. :-)

Yeah, that's it! George and his brother were running coke to Minneapolis and
they thought they were being followed, buried the stuff near one of the supports
of the bridge, and boom, 40 years later the results of their digging brought the
bridge down.

MnMikew wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
MnMikew wrote:
And of course the Star & Sickle (Tribune) comes out with an editorial
today blaming the bridge collapse on our Republican Gov. Effing moonbats.
It'll be Bush's fault before the weekend.


Stories are beginning to surface about the history of this bridge, and
how it was never intended to be an arterial conduit in the first place.

Yup. 40 years old and weak. Not good. Even though it was built in 1967 it
will still be Bushs fault. :-)



In fact, I just got this from a friend in Iowa 10 minutes ago:




************************************************** *****************

well, it IS his fault, with hundreds of billons going to a worthless
war that should have been spent on infrastructure. But I know, it would
have just been spent on hundred-dollar blowjobs for his friends anyway . . .


-----Original Message-----
From: D. Peter Maus
To:
Sent: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 4:37 pm
Subject: Subjects Galore

wrote:
Hang in there. It could be worse. You could be in Milwaukee.
Or on a bridge in Minneapolis. . . .

Interesting stories are beginning to surface about the history of
that bridge. And how it was never intended to be a arterial structure.

I'm sure it will be Bush's fault before the weekend.

************************************************** *******************

MnMikew wrote:
And of course the Star & Sickle (Tribune) comes out with an editorial today
blaming the bridge collapse on our Republican Gov. Effing moonbats.

Just like the sign on Truman's desk said-- "The buck stops here".

It's called "responsibility". The *******s (Republican -or- Democrat)
try to save money by deferring maintenance. Seeing as you didn't share
the article with us, I think the point of your newspaper was that he was
THE governor, not that he was a Republican governor. Why make it a
political thing?

D Peter Maus wrote:


well, it IS his fault, with hundreds of billons going to a worthless
war that should have been spent on infrastructure. But I know, it would
have just been spent on hundred-dollar blowjobs for his friends anyway .

Well, I wouldn't say it was Bush's fault.

However, given the choice of fixing our infrastructure, broken health
care system and all of our needs on the home front, I'd vote for
spending that half a trillion *here* rather than pouring it down that
bottomless **** hole...

Zeke Zzzppt wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:


well, it IS his fault, with hundreds of billons going to a worthless
war that should have been spent on infrastructure. But I know, it
would have just been spent on hundred-dollar blowjobs for his friends
anyway .

Well, I wouldn't say it was Bush's fault.

However, given the choice of fixing our infrastructure, broken health
care system and all of our needs on the home front, I'd vote for
spending that half a trillion *here* rather than pouring it down that
bottomless **** hole...


I didn't write it. I only passed it on as an example of my earlier
assertion.