Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 5, 12:52 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message ... Eduardo is full of crap using technical terms for broadcast coverage he does not understand so what is his opinion worth... nothing! AM filings at the FCC... for example, proofs of directional systems, have readings expressed in mV/m, and they are kept consistent even if the readings, such as on radials close to the array, are over 1000 mV/m. The criteria for licensing, in fact, used to be that the station had to put a 25 mV/m signal over the city of license. 1000 mV/m isn't going to woo back those young listeners...you know, the ones whose numbers are thinning. You're in a pickle! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WSM-AM: Significant revenue from our sky-wave coverage ! | Shortwave | |||
SCYF now adds new technology, forecast $15 Million in Revenue | General | |||
"Clear Channel Radio Ad Revenue Slips" | Broadcasting | |||
Newbie ?: I've Built A Simple 1/4 Wave Dipole for 2 Mtrs. Could IMake a1/2 Wave? | Antenna | |||
Newbie ?: I've Built A Simple 1/4 Wave Dipole for 2 Mtrs. Could IMake a1/2 Wave? | Homebrew |