Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 18, 9:05 pm, Steve wrote:
On Sep 18, 8:12 pm, IBOCcrock wrote: On Sep 18, 5:15?pm, Steve wrote: On Sep 18, 3:46 pm, JoanD'arcRoast wrote: In article , I.P. Yurin wrote: On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:41:17 -0000, Stephanie Weil wrote: On Sep 17, 6:57 am, "Brenda Ann" wrote: Were I at home now, I would give up on commercial radio, and spend the paltry sum on XM or Sirius.. at least they program for more than the status quo. You're gonna pay for radio?!!! Sucka! I'd rather take the money I'd save on pay-radio and instead spend it on records, tapes, CDs and replacement diamonds for my hi-fi. ![]() Good strategy. But also note that you can RECORD pay radio and make lots of cheap tapes and CDs. Burn a couple of CDs per month and satellite radio can pay for itself. (1 retail CD == 1 month of sat. radio.) And then there are always the hundreds of Internet audio feeds going on if I don't want to "spin my own". And what... you DON'T pay a monthly subscription for your internet access??? Many people I've met have your same, odd attitude. And the contradiction continues to puzzle me: why do you recoil at paying for radio but happily accept paying for net access? Because Radio & TV in the US is nothing but one long commercial. The internet (at this point in time) offers a great deal more than that. I do not pay for TV access. No cable. No satellite. No thanks. The whole "radio/tv should be free and other media should not be" is just a big headscratcher to those of us who try to approach life logically. I laugh at people who wear "logowear". Is your self-esteem so low that you pay for the privilege of advertising your favorite sweatshop owner? Stephanie Weil New York City, USA Which borough? (I'm also in NYC)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I tend to agree with you here. I'll never enjoy the internet the way I used to enjoy AM/MW radio, but the internet will at least let me listen to most, if not all, of the stations I enjoyed prior to AM IBOC. If the AM broadcast band really is history, and I'm more and more thinking that it is, then streaming audio via the internet seems like the way to go.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Isn't it amazing that just to jam adjacent, smaller broadcasters off the dial, that theHD RadioAlliance's own stations are jamming each other! The broadcast industry must be full of morons - I've heard that it IS full of alcoholics.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I don't know if they're alcoholics, but if Tardo is any indication they're certainly morons.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - "NAB TO DISTRIBUTE GUIDEBOOK FOR NATIONAL ALCOHOL AND DRUG ADDICTION RECOVERY MONTH" http://www.nab.org/AM/Template.cfm?S...entDisplay.cfm Yup - alcoholics! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Nighttime AM-HD now published in Federal Register ! | Shortwave | |||
Nighttime AM-HD now published in Federal Register ! | Shortwave | |||
Nighttime AM-HD now published in Federal Register ! | Shortwave | |||
Looks like iNiquity may get its way on nighttime AM IBOC ! | Shortwave |